Channel
@sgbumps
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,492subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001362563914 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sgbumps |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sgbumps |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 2,492 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 2,490 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 2,489 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 2,488 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 2,488 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,412 |
| Reactions total | 50 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
89 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 87 | 97.8% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 2.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bhairavi Raman & Nanthesh Sivarajah – Syncretic (2025) #worldmusic #India #Australia Сегодня наш музыкальный гусь принёс в клюве дебютный альбом австралийского дуэта Бхайрави Раман и Нантеша Сивараджи. Первая – скрипачка, играющая как в западном, так и карнатике (чаще – в сочетании), её партнёр – перкуссионист, в том числе предпочитающий мридангу. Оба артиста имеют тамильское происхождение, что вы легко ощутите при…
👍4
Los Sara Fontan – Consuelo (2026) #experimental #avantagarde #noise #contemporaryclassical #Spain 🇪🇦 И вновь брошу во вселенную бессловесный клич: процедура расстановки тэгов может быть воистину проблематичной. Одно резонирует: столь же многообразна, красива и мучительна, и в завершение, – щадяща это музыка. Дуэт из Каталонии дебютирует в Отборных Мурашках с альбомом, посвящённым противостоянию, самовыражению и и…
👍4😐1
Gooselabs. E02 #gooselabs #goosenews Искатели мурашек, для вас второй эпизод Лаборатории. Напомню, в ней герои наших прошлых публикаций встречаются с новыми артистами (и иногда даже друг с другом). Продолжим испытывать на себе эффект их уникальных коллабораций. Вот какая собралась восьмёрка сегодня: 1. Dashmesh & Erik Wøllo, feat. Byron Metcalf – The Cave of Light and Shadow (2026) 🇺🇸 Начнёт этот выпуск чудесное…
👍4
Walrus Ghost – If You Could Be Here Now (2026) #instrumental #americana #postrock #USA Кристиан Бэнкс из Нью-Йорка в своей музыке сочетает инструментальное исполнение с электроникой, тем самым словно ставя вопрос: пост-рок ли это, или вам всем почудилось? Может, тут бродит призрак американы откуда-то из центральных штатов и прошлого столетия. В его эмбиенте встречается фолк (простите, возможно, наоборот). После д…
👍3
Xander Naylor – Children of Sound (2026) #experimentaljazz #worldmusic #ethnojazz #jazzrock #USA 🇺🇸Сегодня мы знакомимся с бруклинским композитором, гитаристом и виртуозом творческой мысли, Ксандером Нейлором. Если его предыдущий альбом, "Continuum", охватывал просторы экспериментального джаз-рока в лучшем западном исполнении, то текущая работа, космополитично озаглавленная "Children of Sound", глядит на Восток. …
👍4
Four Picks: 4 электрифицированные странности #4Picks #electronic #experimental #dnb #drone В этой четверо-серии – собрание электронной музыки, лучшим эпитетом к которой будет – "странная". Отправьтесь в четыре безграничных мира, созданных авторами, вместе с нами. 1. Jad Atoui – It Will Take Forever (2026) 🇱🇧 Для начала – альбом-погружения с ливанской экспериментальной сцены. Электронный нерв, связующий состояния, …
👍2
The Uproot Group – Vampires (2026) #fuison #jazzrock #jazzpop #Mexico А вот альбом из жаркой Мексики, то ли на стыке жанров, то ли вовсе бесшовный. "Vampires" посвящён самокопанию и постижению бытия. Не ждите философских концепций, ведь "The Uproot Group" движутся по интуитивному пути, делясь своими открытиями через музыку. Они сочетают современный джаз с отголосками фолка, то упрощая звучание, то "подкручивая" е…
👍3
Chronoscope ~E17: Highlights На какие альбомы из этого выпуска Хроноскопа стоит обратить особенно пристальное внимание? Остановимся на нескольких, оправдавших надежды в наибольшей степени, а где-то – искренне удививших. 22. Upupayāma – Honesty Flowers (2026) 🇮🇹 Мультиинструменталист Алессио Феррари очаровал нас своими мистическими сочинениями. Для исполнения их на концертах он привлекает не менее пяти музыкантов, а…
👍5
🌸 Chronoscope ~E17. 2026, май - июнь #chronoscope #chronicles #goosenews Время пришло: новый Хроноскоп собрал альбомы, появившиеся в мае-июне и собрать из них плейлист. Условие одно: про каждого из этих исполнителей наш музыкальный гусь когда-то рассказывал вам. Мы слушали их предыдущие работы, и теперь вернёмся к ним на оной из платформ: Сборный плейлист: spotify | deezer | youtube И ссылки по каждый альбом: 1…
👍6
Port Mone – Whisper (2026) #experimental #avantgarde #progressivefolk #ambient #fieldrecording #Belarus 🇧🇾🇱🇹 Группа из Беларуси, о которой не мешает знать и которой стоит заинтересоваться, если вам интересны любые эксперименты – сегодня в эфире Отборных Мурашек. Трио по понятным причинам перебралось в Литву, но ожидаемо не утеряло свои корни, подрубленные, но отнюдь не пересохшие по пути. Отправная точка и ключ к …
👍5
🐜 Лови мурашки: e75 #ALive Так! Это что, вовсю выходные? Меня не разбудил наш музыкальный гусь. Торопимся выдать вам десяток шикарных клипов для поддержания вдохновения и мурашек в жизнеспособном состоянии. Этим сегодня займутся: – Fatoumata Diawara*; – Spokanki*; – Billy Strings; – Baltvs; – Villagers of Ioannina City; – Angine de Poitrine*; – Tu-Ner; – Earth Tongue; – Sidus; – Faetooth*. 🏃➡️ Плейлист: https:/…
👍4
Kalamata – Zenosyne (2026) #stonerrock #spacerock #psychedelicrock #Germany 🇩🇪 Немецкое трио, как и их другие соседи по цеху, не отличается штамповкой альбомов: предыдущий увидел свет почти десятилетие назад. Усердно гастролировав и исполняя свои лучшие произведения, группа, наконец, набрала материал для достойной пластинки и вручает её нам. Это оказалась пятёрка треков-фракталов для вдумчивого прослушивания, в ка…
👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sgbumps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 819,014 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Selected Goosebumps” (@sgbumps), 2,492 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sgbumps.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.