10 measurements spanning 27 days, net -1,388. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 23:21
5
+4
27 Aug 2026, 05:47
1
-1,436
24 Aug 2026, 02:28
1,437
+8
20 Aug 2026, 08:57
1,429
+3
17 Aug 2026, 12:24
1,426
+17
14 Aug 2026, 01:56
1,409
+3
11 Aug 2026, 01:32
1,406
+11
8 Aug 2026, 11:40
1,395
+2
7 Aug 2026, 22:17
1,393
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:49
1,393
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1,091 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
501
45.9%
❤🔥
349
32.0%
🔥
108
9.90%
🗿
63
5.77%
🫡
25
2.29%
🤩
24
2.20%
⚡
14
1.28%
😈
7
0.642%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,091 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
PARA SF - SCAR L mk2 - Elcan specterDR 1.5x/6
Okay, a short msg to clear some doubts
SCAR came as a bolt from the blue for the SF. They conducted thorough trials back in 2017–18, and the last round of trials, which were carried out in a hurry, took place in 2024..
Then, out of nowhere, the Ministry of Defence ( MoD ) put it on the table just last month
But good news is that, only few hundred units are to be procur…
PARA SF Operative with FN SCAR-L Mk 16 Mod O (5.56)
- AN/PVS 24 (EOTech M2124 Clip-On Night Vision Weapon Sight)
- Trijicon ACOG with a Trijicon RMR combo
AN/PEQ 15 (Lam)
- B&T Rotex V 5.56 Suppressor
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sfboys009. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“sfboys009” (@sfboys009), 5 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sfboys009.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
