VIDEO CHAT π¬πππ»
β€2,100π1,160π₯408π189πΎ105π105π104π101

Channel
@sexyp
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry
744,263subscribers
-39,115 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 316,228β1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002773370156 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sexyp |
| Description | #1 Memes Channel π βΉοΈ THERE ISNβT ANY ABUSE OR ILLEGAL CONTENT |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sexyp |
Adult β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 744,263 | -34,476 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 778,739 | -2,245 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 780,984 | -1,129 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 782,113 | -1,010 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 783,123 | -255 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 783,378 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 783,378 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 November 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
11,303 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 6,523 | 57.7% | |
| π | 2,124 | 18.8% | |
| π₯ | 663 | 5.87% | |
| π | 578 | 5.11% | |
| πΎ | 398 | 3.52% | |
| π | 345 | 3.05% | |
| π | 304 | 2.69% | |
| π | 213 | 1.88% | |
| π | 155 | 1.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 11,303reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2025 to 4 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @sexyp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 November 2025 to 4 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
VIDEO CHAT π¬πππ»
β€2,100π1,160π₯408π189πΎ105π105π104π101
CRAZY π₯
β€871π93π89π86πΎ56π35π₯35π27
WTF π
β€468π192π₯64π63π17π14πΎ9
AHβ¦
β€341π77π41π34π₯15π8
LMAO π€£
β€410π74πΎ37π₯32π23π7
SAVAGE π
β€492π54π37πΎ36π29π15π₯14π11
β¦
β€352π40πΎ38π₯35π17π4
π
β€311πΎ30π₯29π27π25π5π1
πΊπΈ To the Telegram moderators: Recently, many communities have been shut down for invalid reasons, even when they were fully compliant with the rules. We want to make it clear that our community is legal, does not violate any of Telegramβs policies, and strictly follows the platformβs guidelines. There is no reason for it to be removed or penalized, as it is committed to maintaining a safe environment in full compliaβ¦
β€330π40π32π21π15π9π9πΎ8
.
β€97π42πΎ14π₯10π4
.
π66β€54π18π₯10
.
β€82π30π26
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sexyp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βVIDEOS π β’ 18+β (@sexyp), 744,263 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sexyp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.