3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 675–676 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 02:32
675
no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:56
675
-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:16
676
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
597.0%
avg views ÷ 675 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,030
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held
20 (8 December 2025 – 23 July 2026)
Views total
8,060
Reactions total
87
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 02:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
33
Videos
21
Links
5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
29s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,124 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
381
33.9%
🥰
161
14.3%
🔥
154
13.7%
🍓
124
11.0%
😈
112
9.96%
💯
38
3.38%
😁
35
3.11%
🦄
20
1.78%
👏
19
1.69%
🌚
17
1.51%
🏆
15
1.33%
👍
14
1.25%
👀
12
1.07%
🌭
11
0.979%
🙏
6
0.534%
💋
5
0.445%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2025 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 19 we hold a reading for · 68%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sexxxlight. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 December 2025 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Где живет Сексуальность?
Можно иметь идеальный пресс и жить в режиме постоянной внутренней эвакуации. Можно носить тело как дорогой автомобиль, который никто никогда не заводит.
Самое странное, что желание редко возникает там, где человек становится красивее. Оно возникает там, где он перестает непрерывно себя контролировать.
Поэтому хороший сексолог занимается не сексом. Он занимается диктатурой внутреннего наблю…
Позы - это знаки препинания близости.
Самая возбуждающая поза для меня - это та, в которой не нужно ничего доказывать.
Где можно перестать играть в сексуальность. Не думать о ракурсе. Не изображать страсть. Просто быть.
Настоящая близость начинается там, где тело перестает быть витриной и снова становится домом.
И тогда уже неважно, кто сверху.
Важно, что между вами есть доверие.
А какая поза для вас про близост…
Можно вечно смотреть на три вещи: как горит огонь, как течёт вода и на сЫски.
Возвращаюсь к ведению канала 😈
Напишите в комментариях какие темы интересно раскрыть?)
Зы: сегодня нас 666 подписчиков) считаю это знак 😅
Запись на консультации тоже открыта 😉
Сексуальное выгорание
- это не миф, это вирус, который расползается по нервным окончаниям, поглощая всё, что раньше казалось важным.
Научные исследования.
В 2018 году в журнале Sexual Medicine было опубликовано исследование, которое показало: стресс, перегрузка и хроническая усталость буквально выжигают тестостерон у мужчин и эстроген у женщин. Не просто снижают - выжигают. В итоге теряется не только желание, но и …
“Бьет - значит любит!”?
Один из самых живучих и опасных мифов о «страсти» в отношениях - это убеждение, что физическая агрессия может быть частью любви, а бурное примирение после ссоры якобы усиливает сексуальное влечение.
Иногда ко мне на консультациях приходят женщины с запутанными чувствами: после конфликта, криков или даже рукоприкладства партнер становится особенно ласковым, просит прощения, проявляет щедрость…
«Заслужил - дала» или женский абьюз.
В массовом мифе абьюзер обычно груб, громок и физически тяжел.
Но исследования показывают: насилие давно вышло из категории силы в категорию контроля.
И здесь начинается то, что хуже всего поддаётся диагностике.
Психологическое насилие.
По данным исследований интимного партнёрского насилия, эмоциональный абьюз — самая распространённая форма. Он включает унижение, угрозы, изоляци…
Контракт, подписанный дофамином.
И вот стоит женщина, смотрит на мужчину, который разрушает её психику с точностью швейцарских часов,
и чувствует возбуждение, замешанное на страхе.
Почему?
Потому что абьюзер - это не человек.
Это интерфейс власти.
Он говорит мало, смотрит тяжело,
в его голосе - обещание наказания и одобрения одновременно.
Как у бога из ветхой версии мира.
Психика, выросшая на дефиците любви,
пере…
С твоим характером ты выйдешь замуж только за вибратор.
Что-то подобное недавно услышала я в свой адрес и призадумалась 😅
Если честно, звучит не как угроза, а как вполне рабочий бизнес-план😎Давайте взвесим все За и Против.
- Гарантийный талон - это гораздо надежнее, чем фраза «я исправлюсь».
- У него всегда есть кнопка off несколько режимов и высокая производительность.
- Он не спрашивает «а что у нас на ужин?»,…
Можно ли сексологу быть сексуальным, если он учит тебя не стыдиться?
Сексолог - это тот человек, который знает, что у тебя внутри есть тайная кнопка,
и она не пытается её сломать, а просто учит тебя не бояться её нажимать.
И вот она выкладывает своё фото…
Не в духе «посмотрите на меня», а в духе:
«я тоже живу в теле»
И люди начинают «шептаться».
Не потому что они злые.
Потому что они боятся, что сексуальность может…
Один половой акт – столько целей!
Вы когда-нибудь задумывались, насколько многогранным может быть это действие? Казалось бы, физиологически оно всегда одно и то же, но в реальности за ним могут стоять совершенно разные мотивы и задачи. От простого снятия напряжения до стремления к власти или глубокой личностной интимности.
Физиологически одно и то же действие (половой акт) может быть средством:
РЕЛАКСАЦИИ: разрядк…
Секс - этнография или что там у них?
То, что для нас «норм»для кого-то - повод поднять бровь.
Сексуальность - это не только про анатомию, это про культуру. Погружаемся в исторически сложившиеся мировые тренды!
Голые тела: Да или Нет?
Для племен бассейна реки Амазонка нагота - это как дышать. Никакого «секса» просто тело -холст (татухи, пирсинг - вау!).
Исламские страны: Скромность - наше всё. Чем меньше видно, …
❤25🥰16👀12👏7😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sexxxlight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 615,850 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Секспросвет♥️” (@sexxxlight), 675 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sexxxlight.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
