Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +163. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,542–1,753 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 00:19
1,729
+94
10 Sept 2026, 11:57
1,635
+14
4 Sept 2026, 21:41
1,621
+18
1 Sept 2026, 02:08
1,603
+1
28 Aug 2026, 23:53
1,602
+5
26 Aug 2026, 08:12
1,597
-4
23 Aug 2026, 16:12
1,601
+5
20 Aug 2026, 10:26
1,596
+3
17 Aug 2026, 21:13
1,593
+8
14 Aug 2026, 23:54
1,585
+7
11 Aug 2026, 09:03
1,578
+11
8 Aug 2026, 15:03
1,567
+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:19
1,566
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:34
1,566
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
261 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
78
29.9%
🤡
78
29.9%
🥰
23
8.81%
😁
18
6.90%
👀
14
5.36%
👍
14
5.36%
🔥
13
4.98%
🍓
11
4.21%
💋
5
1.92%
🌚
3
1.15%
❤🔥
1
0.383%
👏
1
0.383%
💘
1
0.383%
🥴
1
0.383%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sexlife_experience. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Как продлить жизнь твоему парику? 🌙
Мы часто пробуем на себе новые образы и парик это частый атрибут, который позволяет внести разнообразие в контент, но парики путаются, начинают выглядеть неопрятно.
Спасение есть!! и я рада поделиться своим небольшим знанием, которое хотела бы получить на десяток париков раньше, с другими моделями :D
🌙 Парик новый и ты хочешь принять меры, чтобы он дольше выглядел красиво
Сдела…
🌟 TRAVKA EXCHANGE — это обменник, который ты полюбишь
🕙 Работаем 24/7. Без перерывов.
💳 Зачисление строго одним переводом.
❤️ Первый и каждый пятый обмен - бесплатно.
А тут больше наших фишек:
💎 Умеем выводить стрипчат и фансли
💎 Гарантируем лучший курс: если у кого-то он выше, то мы перекроем
💎 Умеем пополнять карты наличными
💎 Можем выдать нал с банкомата без использования твоих счетов
💎 Отвечаем чуть медлен…
Мы уже пробуем сервис мультиссылок от лидов, как доделают все фичи, вообще 🔥🔥🔥 будет
Бтв, не проплачено, просто реально полезный продукт от нашего коллеги по сфере в условиях закручивания гаек соцсетей
И да, их ссылку спокойно можно вставлять даже в био вашего профиля
UPD: к сожалению, инста отреагировала на ссылку в профиле негативно, но надеюсь на апдейт и что это пофиксят
🌟 Розыгрыш iPhone 17 Pro
А вот и то самое разьебалово, то над чем я трудился и не спал n-колво ночей... СЕРВИС МУЛЬТИССЫЛОК! готов выпустить это в beta тест, любые баги найденые вами и которые будут мешать вам работать, фиксятся в секунду
от адалт воркера для адалт воркеров, много функций еще впереди, основные + аналитика уже готовы к тестам
getleadhub.app
Не успеваю посты писать, но надеюсь скоро будет пост-коллаба с другой замечательной моделью о фансли 🌙❤️
А пока делюсь лайфиком немного в свое оправдание
🌟 Розыгрыш iPhone 17 Pro
Лучший подарок для эдалтерши от родственников 🤤
💐 Моя бабуля обожает шопинг и дарить близким свои приобретения. Подарила мне средство для мытья пола, урванное по скидону и отдала мне четыре бутылки по поллитра.
Запах правда такой, каким могло бы пахнуть средство - приятный. Наливаю немного в ведерко, чтобы использовать по назначению, добавляю воды, но оно не пенится.
На бутылке иероглифы, загружаю все в автоперево…
РЕЦЕПТ ЩПЕРМЫ
Вы просили - я сварила 💕
Ингредиенты:
Вода — 250 мл
Картофельный крахмал — 1 ст. л.
Желатин — 0,5 ч.л.
Залей желатин небольшим количеством теплой воды и дай ему набухнуть ~5-7 мин
Крахмал смешай с водой, перемешай, чтобы не было комочков. Ставим на небольшой огонь, как разогреется забрасывай желатин, чтобы он разошелся в смеси, постоянно перемешивай, чтобы твой деликатес не сгорел и получился более р…
🍰 Тебя сексуально возбуждают типсы/покупки меню или контента/приваты? Возбуждаешься ли во время секста, когда фан открывает все ппв при занятии чаттингом?
Да, я сразу преображаюсь в хорни тигрицу на трансляции17%
Нет (любые модели)33%
Да (модель на оф итд и чатишь сама)7%
Да (модель на оф итд и вместо тебя чатят чаттеры, но возбуждают чеки со смен)6%
Раньше было, но прошло на дистанции (любые модели)7%
Да (чаттер)20%
Нет (чаттер)20%
Раньше было, но прошло на дистанции (чаттер)5%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Подход к знакомству с фаном и как выбрать подходящий
🔒Короткое знакомство быстро переходящее в секст для анкет с большим входящим трафом
Фанов много, а вас мало. Давать глубину каждому становится невозможно, иначе часть чатов и денег будет потеряна из-за времени ответа. Гораздо выгоднее отдать приоритет тем, кто готов «здесь и сейчас» и уже после продажи искать точки сближения с фаном.
Aftercare здесь особенно важ…
Почему косплей это ниша, в которую ты не захочешь заходить полноценно
Во-первых, чтобы заниматься косплеем вам вообще нихуя не надо быть гиком или кем-то подобным, но ваши чаттеры должны хотя бы минимально изучать и понимать тайтлы, тк фаны, которые по вашим косплеям заходят на страницу, в основном знакомы с персонажами и могут захотеть обсудить их в чате.
Во-вторых, конкуренция здесь огромная, жесткая и токсичная.…
О прозрачном тимлидерстве
Часто о тимлидах я слышу:
«Не понимаем: у нас все работает, потому что у нас есть тимлид или потому что он не работает?»
Если у вас тимлид загадочная персона, которая возможно работает или может не работает совсем или занимается вредительством, то пост для вас 🌙
В небольших командах вся система работы реально может быть прозрачной, когда вы знаете, что делал ваш тимлид в течение рабочего …
❤11🔥5🥰5
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @sexlife_experience. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🍰 Тебя сексуально возбуждают типсы/покупки меню или контента/приваты? Возбуждаешься ли во время секста, когда фан открывает все ппв при занятии чаттингом?
Да, я сразу преображаюсь в хорни тигрицу на трансляции17%
Нет (любые модели)33%
Да (модель на оф итд и чатишь сама)7%
Да (модель на оф итд и вместо тебя чатят чаттеры, но возбуждают чеки со смен)6%
Раньше было, но прошло на дистанции (любые модели)7%
Да (чаттер)20%
Нет (чаттер)20%
Раньше было, но прошло на дистанции (чаттер)5%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@sexlife_experience named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@travka_exchange_bot named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“My Adult Diary” (@sexlife_experience), 1,729 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sexlife_experience.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.