Channel photo updated

Channel
seхcitement
@sexicetement
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,284subscribers
+54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001703466414 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sexicetement |
| Created | 30 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sexicetement |
Topic
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 1,284 | +10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 1,274 | +4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 1,270 | +8 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 1,262 | +5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:02 | 1,257 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 1,256 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:29 | 1,253 | +11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 1,242 | +6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 1,236 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 1,232 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 1,226 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 1,230 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
465 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 222 | 47.7% | |
| 🤣 | 48 | 10.3% | |
| 👍 | 41 | 8.82% | |
| 💔 | 40 | 8.60% | |
| 😢 | 32 | 6.88% | |
| 😁 | 25 | 5.38% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 3.01% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 2.37% | |
| 🤔 | 9 | 1.94% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 1.51% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 1.08% | |
| 🥴 | 5 | 1.08% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.215% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.215% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 465 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 October 2024 to 2 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Так Я же с вами не поделилась записью беседы с Натальей Фомичевой и Марианно Пиццементи о кросс-культурном и сексуальном. И гештальте, и терапии https://youtu.be/s6_gncHmwR0
❤19👍3🔥3🥰2
Signed Anna Ivanyutenko
В последнее время мне часто попадаются видео от Николая Толпинского, в которых он разговаривает с людьми в Африке о женском обрезании, иногда ему даже удается поговорить с женщинами, а не только с имами, старейшинами и другими мужчинами. Например, в одном из них молодая женщина говорит о том, чтобы помочиться ей требуется 20 минут и что это очень и очень больно. Он спрашивает, как в этом случае происходит секс, ка…
😢32😱7❤6💔6🤬5
Signed Anna Ivanyutenko
Гештальт-сексология — непопулярные вопросы Меня ждет очень интересная беседа уже в ближайший понедельник 15 сентября. Я встречусь с Мариано Пиццементи, основателем и директором центра «Гештальт-сексологии» в Турине. Это не первая наша встреча - в прошлом году в Тбилиси он проводил семинар по сексуальной агрессии в рамках моего обучения во Французском гештальт-институте. О моих впечатлениях о том семинаре можно проч…
❤🔥8❤4
Signed Anna Ivanyutenko
Аня, а что почитать о сексуальности? Отвечая на это вопрос, я помимо своего канала обычно рекомендую «Как хочет женщина» Э. Нагоски и прекрасную книгу Н. Фомичевой «Близость». Ну, еще «Сексуальность. Любовь. Гештальт» Б. Мартель. Но мне лично больше всего нравится именно «Близость. Книга о хорошем сексе» Натальи Фомичевой. Мне очень нравится взгляд автора и ее манера писать о столь сложной и полной уязвимости теме…
❤12🖕1
Signed Anna Ivanyutenko
И вот еще
❤1
Signed Anna Ivanyutenko
Photo, posted without a caption
❤28👎1
Signed Anna Ivanyutenko
Photo, posted without a caption
❤31
Signed Anna Ivanyutenko
Ваня Куинджи продолжает видеть в трещинках стен красивое. И эротическое.
❤6
Signed Anna Ivanyutenko
Я тут думала про особенную особенность женской сексуальности. Точнее даже так — я думала о том, по какому параметру женская сексуальность превосходит мужскую. Но это не значит, что из-за это легче живется девочкам, а не мальчикам. Я даже более того скажу. Тот, у кого в любых отношения этот параметр сильнее, даже можно сказать, тот, у кого этот навык сильнее прокачан, с большей вероятностью подстраивается под пар…
❤45💔34👍2
Signed Anna Ivanyutenko
- а ты почему не рожаешь? - я пропагандирую монашеский образ жизни. - но часики-то тикают. - осторожно, ходишь по тонкому льду. ещё одно слово, и придётся отвечать за оскорбление чувств верующих.
🤣45❤7
Signed Anna Ivanyutenko
Написала вот такой пост в тредс: Видела тред про псевдо-легкость сексуального труда. И подумала: И подумала, что есть профессии, которые требуют значительных инвестиций в начале пути, например, пять-шесть лет в ВУЗе, а есть профессии, которые требуют серьезных инвестиций в восстановление после, и это, например, шахтеры. Проституция относится ко второму типу профессий. Конечно, пришлю юноши и сказали мне, что виднее…
👍12❤3
Signed Anna Ivanyutenko
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sexicetement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“seхcitement” (@sexicetement), 1,284 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sexicetement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.