id β (?) cc β me. sdt β sexcova π©΅
π2π₯±2πΎ1π1π1π€ͺ1π1π1

Channel
@sexcova
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002233126411 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sexcova |
| Description | owner @dresmersaa |
| Created | 5 June 2024 β measured β dated from the channelβs first post |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sexcova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 2 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 2 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 5 June 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 15 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
126 reactions across 11 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 25 | 19.8% | |
| β€ | 17 | 13.5% | |
| π | 13 | 10.3% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 12 | 9.52% | |
| π₯ | 10 | 7.94% | |
| π | 8 | 6.35% | |
| π | 7 | 5.56% | |
| π | 6 | 4.76% | |
| π₯΄ | 6 | 4.76% | |
| π | 5 | 3.97% | |
| π₯± | 5 | 3.97% | |
| π | 4 | 3.17% | |
| πΎ | 3 | 2.38% | |
| π | 3 | 2.38% | |
| π€ͺ | 2 | 1.59% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2024 to 10 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
id β (?) cc β me. sdt β sexcova π©΅
π2π₯±2πΎ1π1π1π€ͺ1π1π1
id β (?) cc β me. sdt β sexcova π©΅
β€βπ₯2πΎ1π1π1π₯1π₯±1π₯΄1π1
id β me. cc β me. sdt β old.β€οΈ
π3β€1β€βπ₯1π1π1π₯1
id β me. cc β me. sdt β sexcovaπ©΅
π3β€βπ₯2π₯1π₯±1π₯΄1
id β me. cc β me. sdt β sexcovaπ©΅
π2β€1β€βπ₯1π1π1π1π₯1π₯΄1
id β me. cc β me. sdt β Π΄ΠΈΠ»ΡΡΠ΅.π©΅
β€βπ₯2π2π2π2π1π1
id β tt : cutes.feld cc β me. sdt β Ψ£ΩΨΆΩ ΩΩΩΨ΄Ψ§
β€4π4π1π₯΄1π1π1
id β tt : cutes.feld cc β me. sdt β sexcovaπ©΅
β€5π5π₯2π2π₯΄1π1
Video, posted without a caption
β€4π3π2π1πΎ1π1π1π₯1
Video, posted without a caption
π4β€2β€βπ₯2π1π₯1π€ͺ1π₯±1π1
06.06.24. ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ. ΠΌΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠΉ ΡΠ°Π· ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡΠ°Π΅ΠΌΡΡ Π²Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ, ΠΎΡΠ΄Π°Π΅ΠΌ Π²ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π±Ρ, Π½Π΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Ρ Π½Π° Π΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅, Π½ΠΎ Π²Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΡΡ Π² ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΈ Π² ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ.
π7β€βπ₯2π₯2
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @sexcova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 1,453,244 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ π΄π¦πΉπ€π°π·π’.β (@sexcova), 2 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sexcova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.