Channel
@sexcanwait
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
169subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001090121490 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sexcanwait |
| Description | Foto, video, gif su sutto ciò che riguarda i gatti e l'universo! ———— 🔌 contatto: @zerointernet |
| Created | 22 December 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sexcanwait |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 169 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 169 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 20 December 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How many solar or lunar eclipses occur in one calendar year? The answer very much depends on the year. One calendar year has a minimum of 4️⃣ eclipses – 2️⃣ solar eclipses and 2️⃣ lunar eclipses. Most years – such as 2022 – have only 4️⃣ eclipses, although there are years with 5️⃣ eclipses (2013, 2018 and 2019), or 6️⃣ eclipses (2011 and 2020). ❗️It is very rare to have 7️⃣ eclipses in one calendar year. The last…
How does an occultation look like? Enjoy a fascinating video that shows the occultation of Saturn by the Moon.🤩 15 years ago, in May 2007, using a ground-based telescope, an amateur astronomer Jan Koet had a chance to film the occultation of the second largest planet in the solar system by the Moon. The author of the timelapse explains that he made alterations to accentuate the luminosity of Saturn. The sequence …
What is a moon and its main criteria? We have already specified the main features of a star and a planet, let’s now also clarify what a moon is. It would be incorrect to limit the definition of a 🌕 as any celestial object that revolves around a planet, because that would mean dust particles also fall under that category. According to the International Astronomical Union (IAU), to be called a moon, a celestial body…
How many moons have been discovered in our solar system? In our system almost all major planets and even dwarf planets have moons. Many are naturally born from the leftover gas and dust from the planet’s formation. Few others belonged to the Kuiper Belt and is believed to have been captured by gas giants. Among the wide variety of celestial objects found in our solar system, we have 2️⃣1️⃣0️⃣ moons of varying size…
What are the ultimate figures of moons in our solar system? 📍With just 12.4 km (7.7 miles) in diameter, Mars’ moon Deimos is one of the smallest known moons in our solar system. 📍With a diameter of 5,267 km (3,273 miles), Jupiter’s moon Ganymede is the largest moon in our solar system. 📍Saturn has the most number of moons: 82 moons orbit the ringed planet. Subscribe- t.me/askmenow
What are the eclipses and occultations? ✔️An occultation is a complete obscuration of the light of an astronomical body, most commonly a star, by another astronomical body, such as a planet or a satellite, without any interaction between the bodies involved. This is purely apparent and related to the observer. Hence, a total solar eclipse is the occultation of the Sun☀️ by the Moon🌕. ✔️An eclipse is the result of t…
https://www.instagram.com/reel/ChZxygJlOG8/?igshid=MDJmNzVkMjY=
☄️ Info: https://www.rainews.it/amp/articoli/2022/08/tornano-le-stelle-cadenti-nella-notte-di-san-lorenzo-ad102732-b65a-44fa-bb39-86c9a29486bd.html 🐈 Curiosità: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/109P/Swift-Tuttle
Video, posted without a caption
https://youtu.be/_foYwmy2GxA
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @sexcanwait. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Si chiama Cassiopea A. In realtà è...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 December 2020 to 6 November 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌌🐈Gattini&Universo🐈🌌” (@sexcanwait), 169 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sexcanwait.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.