Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Семизвездие

Channel

Семизвездие

@sewstars

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,192subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001187437296
TypeChannel
Username@sewstars
Created4 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sewstars

Growth

1,1911,1921,191.57 August 2026 — 1,191 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,191 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,192 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,191–1,192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:541,192+1
7 Aug 2026, 18:501,191no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:471,191first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.3%
avg views ÷ 1,192 subscribers
Avg views / post
195
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,897
Reactions total106
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

106 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁4946.2%
👍1615.1%
👏1615.1%
👀76.60%
💯54.72%
43.77%
👎32.83%
💊32.83%
🏆21.89%
🙉10.943%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC26 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Лёня Волкий принялся продвигать Яблоко. - У меня ооочень плохие предчувствия... Этот рейс добром не кончится https://t.me/egorershofff/20702

💯1

7 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC33 viewsread 7 August 2026

Конечно, если к тебе подойдёт такой человечек с приятным, но не запоминающимся лицом, с аккуратной стрижкой и, небрежно махнувши неким удостоверением, интимным шёпотом спросит - "А что, милейший... доверяете ли вы всенародно избранному товарищу генеральному императору?" - ответ будет ожидаем. Мысленный эксперимент показывает, что половина б ещё и зиганула от души. Я-то бы вообще с двух рук. В клинических случаях може

7 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC53 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Между прочим, решили выяснить - и таки дознались, что государю императору доверяют 70 процентов зоотечественников. Эт стал быть, 30 процентов - НЕ ДОВЕРЯЮТ?! НЕ ДОВЕРЯЮТ ТАКОМУ МИЛОМУ?! ТАКОМУ ВСЕНАРОДНО ОБОЖАЕМОМУ?! Вот измена-то и крамола...😢 Горько это сознавать. Император для вас всё - и пенсии плотит, и сво вот замутил, движуха, и пальмовое масло... Парад опять же. Утильсбор. Роскомнадзор. - Казалось бы, живи и

😁2

7 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC81 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Поинтересовался за традицыонных ценностей - указ нашего обожаемого государя, всё таки - и чот погрустнел. Как их запомнить и непременно в нужном порядке? А то ведь рано или поздно придется докладывать. Стар я для этого, вот што. Не превзойти мудрость Отца-и-Матери Отечества. А ведь государь старался, писал... Ручек сколько сгрыз, это ж уму непостижимо. Язык от усердия высовывали. Сопел и ёрзал. В общем, придется таки

😁1

7 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC111 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Разумеется, малолетних мерзавцев надо индоктринировать Колобком и Курочкой Рябой. Как можно раньше, пока они не узнали об Алисе в Стране Чюдес или, простихоспаде, о гарри-портере. Тогда им и человек-павук не страшен будет потом и прочая марвеловская тволач. И буратиной их, хороняк, буратиной! Маша и медведь неплохо, но несёт в себе скрытые угрощы квадробберства. А иные с позволения сказать - сказки,надо б по рассужде

😁51

6 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC232 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Собираем средства на патриотическую экранизацыю песни "В лесу родилась ёлочка." На очереди экранизацыя поговорки "семь пуль - одна яма" - русская философская притча и стихотворения "стою на асфальте я, в лыжи обутый" - русская народная галлюцинация. Прошу участвовать. Иначе всему кайки

👍8👏4👀2😁2

6 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC232 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ADG2ch

Я спросил недавно у ИИ, почему мы, русские патриоты, проиграли в 90-е, либералам и западной агентуре битву за власть? Ведь народ же был на нашей стороне…. А в РФ победили русофобы. ИИ ответил: либералы, будучи меньшинством, выиграли битву за символическое пространство: заставили народ полюбить сытую и спокойную жизнь, отучили быть воинами и не бояться крови, заставили обуржуазиться, покупать товары в интернете и забы

👀5🏆2💊2

6 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC239 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

И дядя Костя Игнатьев, препод на филологическом - удивительнейший и обаятельнейший распиздяй. Дядь Костя был отцом моего другана и вечного от одоклассника Игорёхи. Поэтому и дядя. - Он влиял на нас одним своим присутствием, как и вся обстановка комнат в их коммуналке в доме 11 по Свечному - где на гнущихся полках уживались обломки греческих амфор, статуэтки из Танагры и альбомы славного Жана Эффеля, по которым мы и

👍41

6 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC243 viewsread 7 August 2026

Но говоря по совести - в городе может быть только один университет. А в Эспэбэ этого добра - как говна за баней стало. - Я ещё помню специфический дымок в святом и непорочном здании Двенадцати коллегий. - Филфак, известный рассадник. БГ Гребенщиков, известный математик. Биофак. Количество (спорное) ножек у ганглиев. И, суко - никакой охраны!!! И дикий же нород обитал в этих дебрях.- Не то сейчас. 😐

6 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC247 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Или вот допустим Ломоносов. Не город, а Михаил Василич. Персонаж мутный и непонятный, как княжна Тараканова, бедняжка - но это был век такой, осьмнадцатый, мутный. Там до взятия Бастилии французскими рабочими такая хрень повсеместно происходила - вы ахнете. Да што с вас взять, вы почитайте, как изъяснялись на письме тогдашние божественные базилевсы и базилиссы. Кровь из глаз. Но вы же ничего не читаете, Тредиаковског

👏72👍1🙉1

6 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC240 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Когда Курочку Рябу снимать будете - а будете, куда вы денетесь - к нам на кафедру научного патриотизма зайдите. Мы вам такого тут понапишем... Вот, например, триллер: жила была Курочка-Ряба. И снесла она как то дедушке яичко. Левое. Напрочь... У нас ещё много идей, обращайтесь. За долю малую 25 процентов

😁11

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sewstars. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 676,447 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Семизвездие” (@sewstars), 1,192 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sewstars.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.