Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

اسياد الميمي العراقي الاصيل المحترمون

@sewercels

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

201subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001537486607
TypeChannel
Username@sewercels
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sewercels

Growth

201202201.57 August 2026 — 202 subscribers8 August 2026 — 202 subscribers15 August 2026 — 201 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 201–202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 03:03201-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:20202no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:38202first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.1%
avg views ÷ 201 subscribers
Avg views / post
62.5
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held18 (6 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,125
Reactions total78
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

78 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6380.8%
😁1114.1%
🤣45.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC20 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

في مناظرة برتراند راسُل وفريدريك كوبلستون (حول وجود الله 1948) حينما إحتجّ الأخير أن: كل محدثِِ ممكن وألّا شيء يتضمن سبب ذاته إلا وكانَ واجباََ، (لا يوجد أي عالم مختلف عن الأشياء التي تشكله، أكثر من الجنس البشري الذي هو شيء منعزل عن أعضاءه. ولذلك، ينبغي أن أقول، بما أن الأشياء أو الأحداث موجودة) إن مُجمل الاشياء والجواهر الممكنة عِلّة وجودها هو الوجود الواجب فَردّ برتراند راسُل: إن هذه مغالطة تخلِطُ بيْن الجِنْس واف

3

Signed A.

7 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC48 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣4😁43

Signed A.

7 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC58 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

لماذا يكرهون بغداد؟ قام المشروع الـsهيـونيّ على دعاية رئيسية، وهي أنّ فلسـطـ.يـن "أرض بلا شعب" وهي فكرة استعارها منه بعض الكارهين لبغداد وثقافتها ومجتمعها؛ عبر ترويج مقولة أن "بغداد مدينة بلا سكّان أصليين".. وطبعًا لا أحد يتطوّع لشرح معنى مصطلح "السكّان الأصليين" هنا.. وتظهر معالم هذه الكراهية في وجدان البعض، الذين يمتلىء "التايم لاين" حاليًا بمنشوراتهم، المليئة بالتحريض والاستخفاف، والمستظلّة بالدولة والسلاح والقوّة

4

Signed A.

7 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC58 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

حتى تعرف الالمان شكد شعب مرح و دمه خفيف اسمع هاي اقوة نكته عدهم و بكل مناسبه يلتقون لازم واحد يسولفها و يضحكون عليها حيل حتى من يسمعوها اكثر من مرة النكته تكول فد يوم شايب عمره اكثر من مية سنة تخربط و اجت الاسعاف اخذته بالطريق الشايب سأل الممرضة احنه وين رايحين ؟ الممرضه كالت رايحين للمقبرة .. الشايب كلها بس اني بعدني ما متت الممرضة كلتله واحنه هم بعدنه ما وصلنه 😀 هه

4

Signed A.

7 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC59 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

كنت اظن الذين يسبون الحشد وشبابه، ويتهمونه ويجردونه من وطنيته بسبب نقم الناس على الوضع السياسي والمعيشي بالعراق.. تبين الآن أنهم ينظرون إلى شبابنا بالحشد على أنهم مجرد شيء استهلاكي انتهت صلاحيته ويجب رميه تحت يافطة موالاتهم لإيران، وبحجج اخرى واهية فتراهم يبررون قصفهم والا ما معنى التبرير؟ والكل يعرف أن الحشد لم يشارك بضرب السعودية والضربات انطلقت من اليمن. واليمن تبنت كل العمليات تركت السعودية اليمن خوفاً من صواريخ

😁41

Signed A.

7 Aug 2026, 04:07 UTC65 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

هاي منو كالك زين صفر حبيبي طالع برنس

1

Signed A.

7 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC64 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

بعدين شبيهم ذولي الزبايل صارلكم 3 سنين تسوون عقود و تفتحون مصانع مسيرات بالجرف والديوانية غير تدشنوهن ولد الزبايل لو كدرتكم عالكاظمي 😒

😁2

Signed A.

7 Aug 2026, 03:59 UTC64 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

العير اق دولة زربة و اتمنة الحشد يستولي عالحكم حتة يتولاكم دك نعل

2

Signed A.

6 Aug 2026, 22:35 UTC71 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

اني لكم بالمرصاد

6

Signed Hadi Abd al Jabar

6 Aug 2026, 22:35 UTC71 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ولأن أكول الحق واحاول أتخلص من الحثالات بقدر الإمكان يجون يسبوني

7

Signed Hadi Abd al Jabar

6 Aug 2026, 22:35 UTC70 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Sehj حرفيا خله كسها يضرط

6

Signed Hadi Abd al Jabar

6 Aug 2026, 22:34 UTC70 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

هاي العاهرة الكحبة ضاجت مني لان علقت عليها ب she will fart for sehj طبعا تجذبني وتگلي مو اني زين يا كحبة انتي مو نفسج مصيتي لاخوج ب ٢٠٢٣ مدري ٢٠٢٤ مصت لاخوها العاهرة ولو تشوف القرود بتعليقاتها يا ابو البنفسجي إلا تحس بمغص كلهم نفس مجيد

5😁1

Signed Hadi Abd al Jabar

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @sewercels. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اسياد الميمي العراقي الاصيل المحترمون” (@sewercels), 201 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sewercels.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.