Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐫 𝐒𝐧𝐚𝐩𝐞 🕯

@severussnapeAl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,097subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001591025014
TypeChannel
Username@severussnapeAl
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/severussnapeAl

Growth

1,0961,0971,096.513 Aug 2026, 23:17 — 1,096 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 15:45 — 1,097 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 23:1714 Aug 2026, 15:45
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,096–1,097 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 15:451,097+1
13 Aug 2026, 23:171,096first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,036 reactions across 19 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
56827.9%
custom 546548627805097923234516.9%
💯29114.3%
😭24011.8%
❤‍🔥2029.92%
🙏944.62%
🔥613.00%
💔512.50%
🥰442.16%
👎412.01%
🕊180.884%
💘150.737%
😨140.688%
👍130.639%
😢120.589%
💋110.54%
🗿40.196%
😈30.147%
🤨30.147%
👏20.098%
2 further kinds40.196%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,036reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2025 to 12 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @severussnapeAl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 April 2025 to 12 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Sept 2025, 20:02 UTC≈4,090 views488 reactions7 Starsread 13 August 2026

Может, воскресить канал?

💯291🙏86custom 54654862780509792326419❤‍🔥10👍6👎6💘6

2 May 2025, 19:04 UTC≈6,220 views287 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🪄🪄🪄

😭190💔33custom 546548627805097923223🕊1814💘4💋3👎2

10 Apr 2025, 19:19 UTC≈6,680 views269 reactions6 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

🖤 #𝓔𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓱

custom 546548627805097923217428🥰19😭18😢12❤‍🔥8🔥8👎2

7 Apr 2025, 15:36 UTC≈5,310 views65 reactions4 Starsread 13 August 2026

https://t.me/boost/severussnapeAl

❤‍🔥37custom 546548627805097923219🔥7👎2

7 Apr 2025, 15:12 UTC≈4,940 views212 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

🖋Сегодня я отвечу на один из самых часто задаваемых вопросов в мой адрес: почему я выбрал зельеварение? 🏺 Не было какого-то одного момента «озарения», когда я вдруг понял, что мое призвание — зелья. Скорее, это было медленное, но неуклонное движение к неизбежному. В моей жизни мало что приносило мне настоящее удовлетворение, особенно в раннем детстве. Отец... Он был отвратительным человеком. Мать пыталась оградить м

110custom 546548627805097923247❤‍🔥24🔥11💘5💋3🥰3😭3

7 Apr 2025, 15:03 UTC≈3,350 views50 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️ Победителем нашего розыгрыша становится 6 - @TeoriElis Мы поздравляем вас! 😀 Для получения приза свяжитесь с @sobakasutulayaa

❤‍🔥33😭8💋5👎2🔥2

7 Apr 2025, 14:05 UTC≈3,150 views47 reactionsread 13 August 2026

До конца розыгрыша остался 🍂 🍂🍂🍂

❤‍🔥38custom 546548627805097923252👎2

6 Apr 2025, 18:28 UTC≈3,080 views59 reactionsread 13 August 2026

У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Доброго времени суток, профессор. Рада вашему возвращению! 🖤 Это до сих пор самый лучший канал о Северусе Снейпе для меня. Куда пропадали?) ↩️ Здравствуйте, поглотила работа, заказы.

39🙏8🔥5❤‍🔥4👎2custom 54654862780509792321

6 Apr 2025, 18:08 UTC≈2,950 views63 reactionsread 13 August 2026

У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Вы переживали когда северус умер?и как вообще вам этот персонаж? ↩️ Конечно. Думаю мое мнение касательно данного персонажа видно и так.

42😭14🔥4👎2❤‍🔥1

6 Apr 2025, 18:06 UTC≈2,990 views53 reactionsread 13 August 2026

У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Пианино — это похвально. А как относитесь к стихотворениям? На вашем канале было замечено несколько. ↩️ Стихотворений на данном канале далеко не несколько, отсюда можно судить, что испытываю к ним особую симпатию

39🔥6💔4custom 54654862780509792322❤‍🔥1👎1

6 Apr 2025, 18:04 UTC≈2,710 views53 reactionsread 13 August 2026

У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Доброго времени суток, профессор. Заглянула сюда, чтобы пожелать вам поменьше взорванных котлов и побольше нервов. Они вам с вашей работой наверняка понадобятся) ↩️ Благодарю за пожелания🤩

35custom 54654862780509792326🔥5🥰4👎2❤‍🔥1

6 Apr 2025, 18:03 UTC≈2,570 views40 reactionsread 13 August 2026

У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! какие именно читали фанфики со снейпом? ↩️ На сколько помню с Ожп были. Но это было давно..

31🥰4👎2🔥2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @severussnapeAl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 806,868 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐫 𝐒𝐧𝐚𝐩𝐞 🕯” (@severussnapeAl), 1,097 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/severussnapeAl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.