Channel
@sevapulya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
203subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001300426538 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sevapulya |
| Description | Всеволод Пуля: медиа, технологии, будущее Напиши мне 👉 @pulya А еще есть сайт: https://pulya.ru |
| Created | 15 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sevapulya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 203 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:40 | 203 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 23 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
148 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 40 | 27.0% | |
| 👍 | 37 | 25.0% | |
| ❤ | 28 | 18.9% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 10.1% | |
| 😍 | 14 | 9.46% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 2.70% | |
| custom 5458681293212490944 | 3 | 2.03% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 2.03% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 2.03% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.676% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 October 2024 to 10 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sevapulya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 October 2024 to 10 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Все больше людей используют ИИ как полноценную замену собственному мышлению. Нейросети становятся для них внешним источником готовых выводов, которым доверяют без сомнений. В университете Пенсильвании провели эксперимент: 1 372 участника выполнили более 9 500 заданий. Главный вывод оказался неприятным: люди принимали ошибочную логику ИИ в 73,2% случаев, а оспаривали ее только в 19,7%. Даже когда ответы модели были н…
❤6👍4
Генеральный директор Axios Джим ВандейХей написал это письмо про ИИ своим детям. Привожу с незначительными сокращениями ⸻ Дорогие мои, Если коротко: я теперь уверен, что ИИ перевернёт вашу работу и жизнь сильнее, чем интернет — а возможно, даже сильнее, чем электричество. И это произойдёт в ближайшие месяцы, а не годы. Изменения будут быстрыми, масштабными, радикальными, дезориентирующими и пугающими. Никто не ос…
❤7🔥6👎3🤡3💩2
👆по поводу опроса: если останется только одна платформа/соцсеть, то у любых контент-мейкеров не будет выбора, и они пойдут на нее, подтянув общий уровень качества и разнообразия. Мы уже видели это на примере перетока аудитории известно откуда в телеграм и (в меньшей степени) VK. Так что я бы голосовал за Одноклассников. Они наиболее гибкие в средствах выразительности из этих трех. А криэйторы и инфлюэнсеры подтянут…
custom 54586812932124909443😁2💯1
Если бы в мире осталась только одна платформа/соцсеть и выбор был только из этих, то что бы вы выбрали и почему?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😁10👍1💩1🤡1
Архитектура — это медиа, вещающее через время. Так говорил нам на журфаке Иван Засурский. В таком случае, граффити — это тоже медиа, вещающее через время, пусть и более быстротечное, чем архитектура. И вот вам, например, Хуанцзюпин — улица в китайском Чунцине. Больше километра домов, покрытых яркими граффити. Жителям ул. Хуанцзюпин повезло — недалеко от них разместилась Сычуаньская академия изящных искусств. Ее д…
❤10👍6🔥5😍4
Какой самый главный текст для охвата массовой аудитории вы можете написать в 2024 году? СЦЕНАРИЙ для видео. Как бы мы, текстоцентричные люди, их ни любили, тексты в чистом виде становятся инструментом для решения узких задач и для охвата определенных сегментов аудитории. Массово люди все же смотрят видео, видео, видео. Я знаю, о чем говорю. Наша редакция Russia Beyond @russiabeyond прошла путь от печатных вкладок …
👍20🔥11😍7😁3❤1
Для меня самый частый сценарий использования ChatGPT — интеллектуальный пас. Есть креативная или даже техническая задача; не знаешь, с чего начать — забивай ТЗ в ChatGPT. Результат, скорее всего, не подойдет «как есть», но даст тебе отправную точку для собственных размышлений. Или поможет отмести самые банальные ассоциации «первого уровня». Получается такая удобная практика «думать об кого-то». А как у вас с этим…
🔥10👍6
Китайский народный икоммерс. Итак, Синцзянь-Уйгурский автономный регион, округ Аксу, уезд Синьхэ, село Гаи. Население: 1300 человек. Из них половина занята в производстве традиционных уйгурских музыкальных инструментов: датур, тамбур, равап, сатар. — Вот здесь у нас помещение, где выстругивают основу под инструмент. Тут комната обработки и покрытия лаком. Здесь цех натягивания струн. Склад готовой продукции… — А …
🔥8❤4😍3
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @sevapulya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Если бы в мире осталась только одна платформа/соцсеть и выбор был только из этих, то что бы вы выбрали и почему?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 October 2024 to 10 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 633,183 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПУЛЯ.” (@sevapulya), 203 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sevapulya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.