Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

‌ ‌ ‌ㅤꫂ᭪݁ 𝖥𝗅︎𝗎𝖿︎𝖿︎𝗒𝖬𝗂𝗇︎

@seungmoverse

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,204subscribers

+45 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002339193809
TypeChannel
Username@seungmoverse
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/seungmoverse

Growth

1,1591,2041,181.511 August 2026 — 1,159 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,159 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,204 subscribers11 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,152–1,211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:481,204+45
11 Aug 2026, 09:481,159no change
11 Aug 2026, 03:161,159first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 10 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.8%
avg views ÷ 1,204 subscribers
Avg views / post
227
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held16 (10 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total3,628
Reactions total298
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

298 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭9431.5%
❤‍🔥7926.5%
💘7324.5%
🍓5217.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 298reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC131 viewsread 11 August 2026

꒱ مینهو، پسری مبتلا به اختلال تجزیه هویت، وقتی برای اولین بار، جیسونگ پسر یکی از قاتلین خانواده‌اش رو دید، تصمیم به انتقام گرفت، اما نمیدونست... ꒰ ˚₊‧ ⋆ برای خوندن این #فیکشن لینک زیر رو لمس کن 👀 ۰ ࣪⤹ ⋆ 𝑇𝑎𝑝 ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑑 ⋆

Signed 𝖺𝗋𝗂(𝖺𝗇︎𝗇︎𝖺) 🇹🇭

10 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC150 views29 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @Changbin_binPhoto

🐷🐰ㅤㅤ: ㅤㅤ𝖻𝗎𝖻𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗌⠀﹠ 𝖻𝗂𝗇𝗇𝗂𝖾

🍓29

10 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC197 views46 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💘37❤‍🔥8🍓1

10 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC206 views48 reactionsread 11 August 2026

تولدت مبارک هیونگی مورد علاقه‌ی سونگمین :>

😭38💘9❤‍🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC180 views33 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

😭28❤‍🔥4💘1

10 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC188 views35 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ‌ ‌ ‌ ㅤ 🪼 ‌‌⭐‍ ׅ ࣪ ꫂ᭪݁ㅤ

❤‍🔥29😭3🍓2💘1

10 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC150 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @oneirataxxiaaPhoto

📍- چیزی که چند ساعتیه بالا گرفته اعتراض استی ها نسبت به پروموشن ضعیف دایو‌وان برای اسکیز هست. موضوع از اونجایی منشأ میگیره که کمپانی فکر کرده توی سال 2020 زندگی می‌کنیم و با بیلبورد گرفتن میتونه چیزی رو تغییر بده در حالی که هیچ تأثیری نداره، و استی ها-کره‌ای و اینتر- توییتر، شروع به توییت زدن کردن و این توییت ها از صبح تا حالا داره لایک و ویو بالایی میگیره. #Skzsupport ' for supporting skz in different ways'

🍓5

Signed - golie -

10 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC170 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @oneirataxxiaa

🔪 - هممون از پروموت بد کمپانی آگاهیم و این چیز جدیدی نیست. ولی اینکه توی سال 2026 بزرگ ترین آرتیست کمپانیت رو که فاکینگ 9 ساله دبیو کرده این‌مدلی پروموت کنی و با بیلبورد زدن بعدا منت هم سرشون بزاری یکم فشار داره؟! ما نمیگیم نزن، ولی حداقل یه برنامه ای، شویی چیزی هم بفرست خب. بیلبورد نه استریم میاره نه فن... جدی بهش فکر کنین خودتون الان رو بیلبورد آلبوم گلزار رو ببینین میرین گوش کنین؟😭 - خب حالا که چی؟ ما چیکار کنیم؟

🍓5

Signed - golie -

10 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC788 viewsread 11 August 2026

بچه ها حتما توی پری ووتینگ اینکیگایو شرکت کنین خیلی مهمه و رای گیری موزیک کور رو هم فراموش نکنین.

10 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC199 viewsread 11 August 2026

✦ از آپدیت های #تور عقب موندی ؟! با چنل های امروز از تمام #آپدیت ها با خبر شو استی 𓂃 🤍 ادیت های خاکبرسری و #رمانتیک از تمام شیپ های اسکیز ✦ 𝑪𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒓𝒚 𝑩𝒍𝒐𝒔𝒔𝒐𝒎 🤍 تم دارک چری #مینسونگ رو از تنها چنل تم اسکیز اد کردی؟ ✦ 𝐑𝐔𝐍 𝐈𝐓 🤍 دیلی فعال و کیوت سونگمین، تمامی #اپدیت های سونگمو اینجاست ✦ 𝖥𝗅︎𝗎𝖿︎𝖿︎𝗒𝖬𝗂𝗇︎ 🤍 آپدیـت و #مومنت‌های کامل مینسـونـگ تو کامبک جدید ✦ 𝑸𝒖𝒐𝒌𝒌𝒂 𝒛𝒐𝒏𝒆 🤍 ام وی #جدید اسکیز با زیرنویس+ کامبک جدید ✦ 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗵𝗼 🤍رپری

10 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC206 viewsread 11 August 2026

✦ از آپدیت های #تور عقب موندی ؟! با چنل های امروز از تمام #آپدیت ها با خبر شو استی 𓂃 🤍 استی تا وقتی با مایی #هیچکس نمیتونه مانع آزادیت بشه ✦ ʀᴏɴɪ 🤍 پک سریال #ترکی استری‌کیدز رو از بایست اد کردی؟ ✦ 𝐑𝐔𝐍 𝐈𝐓 🤍 دیـلی آپدیـتـی از #جیسونگ؛ آرشـیو کـامـل تور و کامبک جدید ✦ 𝕳𝖆𝖓'𝖘 𝖈𝖔𝖒𝖕𝖆𝖘𝖘 🤍 داستان‌هایی عمیق، داغ و بدون #سانسور! ✦ Fiction Addicts 🤍 عکس کاپلی #هیونلیکس با هوش مصنوعی ✦ 𝐴𝐼 𝑁𝐸𝑀𝐸𝑆𝐼𝑆 🤍 دیلی آپدیتِ #گلدن‌ویسِ نسل چه

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @seungmoverse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 233,741 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“‌ ‌ ‌ㅤꫂ᭪݁ 𝖥𝗅︎𝗎𝖿︎𝖿︎𝗒𝖬𝗂𝗇︎” (@seungmoverse), 1,204 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seungmoverse.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.