Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Seth Dillon

Channel

Seth Dillon

@sethdillon

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

6,033subscribers

-89 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001382619060
TypeChannel
Username@sethdillon
Created29 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sethdillon

Growth

6,0336,1226,077.56 August 2026 — 6,122 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,122 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,100 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,080 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,064 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,052 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,041 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,033 subscribers6 August 202625 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 19 days, net -89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,020–6,135 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 09:286,033-8
22 Aug 2026, 13:576,041-11
19 Aug 2026, 13:026,052-12
16 Aug 2026, 02:156,064-16
12 Aug 2026, 21:586,080-20
9 Aug 2026, 12:376,100-22
6 Aug 2026, 10:316,122no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:516,122first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 November 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9,297 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣2,87430.9%
👍2,38625.7%
🔥2,10522.6%
🤮1,56016.8%
🤨2322.50%
😢1401.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,297reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2022 to 4 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Dec 2022, 05:55 UTC≈37,300 views907 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Is pedophilia becoming more common, or is just becoming less stigmatized? Or is it both because the latter is driving the former?

👍425🤮284😢113🔥44🤨28🤣13

3 Dec 2022, 21:51 UTC≈38,300 views590 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

As bad as it was, I don’t see how suppressing the Hunter laptop story helped Biden win. Even at the time it felt like it backfired. Seemed like a classic case of the Streisand Effect. Am I wrong? I guess it is possible for me to be wrong about something.

👍342🤨121🤮56🔥49🤣16😢6

3 Dec 2022, 21:47 UTC≈28,500 views417 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

In the Biden admin, truth is disinformation and disinformation is truth.

🔥309🤮66👍34🤣8

3 Dec 2022, 20:39 UTC≈23,000 views263 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Would have been some sweet poetic justice to have the @nypost drop the Twitter Files thread.

👍198🔥64🤨1

3 Dec 2022, 20:35 UTC≈21,700 views351 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The government cannot get around the first amendment by outsourcing censorship to a third party. Some are saying, “They weren’t the government yet.” You think the censorship stopped the moment Biden was sworn in?

🔥260🤣53👍38

3 Dec 2022, 20:13 UTC≈17,900 views747 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Best Buy still wants you to wear a mask if you are not fully vaccinated.

🤮419🤣303🤨24👍1

3 Dec 2022, 01:00 UTC≈13,800 views466 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The government cannot get around the first amendment by outsourcing censorship to a third party.

👍322🔥139😢5

2 Dec 2022, 22:26 UTC≈12,200 views480 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

My reply to @yoyoel, who claimed Libs of TikTok is dangerous and life-threatening.

👍324🔥156

2 Dec 2022, 19:10 UTC≈13,300 views408 reactionsread 12 August 2026

The Left doesn't even care if you say something outrageous. They cry "incitement!" if you simply notice something they don't want you to pay attention to. It's stupid. Everyone's stupid.

🤣237👍95🔥73😢3

2 Dec 2022, 19:09 UTC≈12,800 views337 reactionsread 12 August 2026

You should have to call for violence to be guilty of incitement to violence. Otherwise, both sides will cry "incitement!" whenever someone says something outrageous that they don't like. And that's exactly what's happening.

🔥260👍73🤨4

2 Dec 2022, 19:03 UTC≈10,300 views301 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

"So basically because they banned Babylon Bee, that was a turning point in the history of free speech." — @benshapiro

🔥209👍53🤣23🤮16

2 Dec 2022, 18:40 UTC≈9,800 views425 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Twitter's former head of trust and safety @yoyoel defended their decision to lock out the Babylon Bee for "misgendering" because they have a policy against it. A reporter asked for my comment.

🔥310👍72🤣40🤨3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sethdillon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,493,959 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Seth Dillon” (@sethdillon), 6,033 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sethdillon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.