Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ستاک فناوری ویرا (Fortinet, Dell EMC, Cisco)

Channel

ستاک فناوری ویرا (Fortinet, Dell EMC, Cisco)

@setakmag

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

235subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001765243000
TypeChannel
Username@setakmag
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/setakmag

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

233236234.512 August 2026 — 233 subscribers12 August 2026 — 233 subscribers26 August 2026 — 234 subscribers10 September 2026 — 236 subscribers12 October 2026 — 235 subscribers23512 August 202612 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 61 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 233–236 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 09:38235-1
10 Sept 2026, 02:20236+2
26 Aug 2026, 00:44234+1
12 Aug 2026, 00:45233no change
12 Aug 2026, 00:32233first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3984.8%
🙏613.0%
❤12.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC70 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/fortinetabrcustomerabrsupportabrbulletin-share-7484167273734279169-WOtw/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAADpXtnIBg4Hx-aEPh26IAZHYefm5e3XUZvY

👍3

15 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC113 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚠️ آسیب‌پذیری خواندن فایل دلخواه در Cisco Catalyst Center سیسکو یک بولتن امنیتی با درجه High برای آسیب‌پذیری CVE-2026-20191 منتشر کرده است که محصولات Cisco Catalyst Center و Cisco Catalyst Center Global Manager را تحت تأثیر قرار می‌دهد. CVE: CVE-2026-20191 CVSS Score: 7.5 (High) این نقص امنیتی ناشی از اعتبارسنجی ناکافی داده‌های ورودی کاربر بوده و به یک مهاجم راه دور بدون نیاز به احراز هویت اجازه می‌دهد با ارسال درخ…

👍2🙏1

8 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC145 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7480545862507659264

👍2

30 Jun 2026, 05:59 UTC183 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

هر نسخه جدید FortiOS فقط یک به‌روزرسانی نرم‌افزاری نیست؛ بلکه نشان می‌دهد مسیر توسعه محصولات Fortinet به کدام سمت حرکت می‌کند. در نسخه 8.0 قابلیت‌های متعددی معرفی شده که برخی از آنها می‌توانند مدیریت، امنیت و بهره‌وری زیرساخت‌های شبکه را به شکل قابل ‌توجهی بهبود دهند، از جمله: ☑️ قابلیت Custom Tags برای مدیریت هوشمندتر Policyها و Address Objectها ☑️ قابلیت Fabric Feeds برای همگام‌سازی متمرکز Threat Intelligence ☑️ …

👍4

28 Jun 2026, 06:29 UTC136 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

آسیب‌پذیری HTTP2 Bomb و حمله DoS در لایه HTTP/2 تاریخ انتشار: 19 ژوئن 2026 سطح شدت: متوسط محققان امنیتی یک روش جدید حمله DoS با نام HTTP2 Bomb شناسایی کرده‌اند که با شناسه CVE-2026-49975 ثبت شده است.. این آسیب‌پذیری چندین پیاده‌سازی اصلی پروتکل HTTP/2 را تحت تأثیر قرار می‌دهد. برخلاف حملات DDoS سنتی، این حمله نیازی به شبکه بزرگ بات‌نت ندارد و حتی یک مهاجم با منابع محدود اینترنتی نیز می‌تواند باعث از کار افتادن سرو…

👍2🙏1

22 Jun 2026, 05:01 UTC119 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📣 انتشار نسخه جدید فریم‌ور فورتی‌گیت همراهان گرامی، نسخه جدید سیستم عامل فورتی گیت را می‌توانید از طریق وب سایت شرکت ستاک فناوری ویرا در قسمت دانلودها، دانلود نمایید. 🔗 دانلود سیستم عامل فورتیگیت ورژن 7.6.7 ‼️ در حال حاضر ورژن‌های​ پایدار 7.0.19 و 7.2.13 و 7.4.12 هستند. ‼️ ویژگی SSL-VPN برای سری G مدل‌های Entry-Level شامل 90G روی این ورژن دیگر در دسترس نخواهند بود. تنظیمات از ورژن‌های قبلی بروزرسانی نخواهند شد. ت…

👍3

21 Jun 2026, 08:04 UTC105 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%B1%D8%B3%DB%8C-%DA%AF%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B4%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%B7-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D8%A8%D9%87%D8%AE%D8%B7%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%81%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%86-%D8%A7%D8%B7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%A7%D8%AA-share-7474065652115308544-imNN/?utm_source=social_share_send&utm_medium=member_desktop_web&rcm=ACoAADpXtnIBg4Hx-aEPh26IAZHYefm5e3XUZvY

👍4

10 Jun 2026, 06:59 UTC162 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

طی هفته جاری، هشت آسیب‌پذیری با شدت بحرانی (Critical) و بالا (High Severity) افشا شده‌اند که سه مورد از آنها دارای درجه بحرانی هستند. آسیب‌پذیری‌های شناسایی‌شده در Cisco SD-WAN Manager و Cisco Unified Communications Manager نیازمند اقدام اصلاحی فوری هستند. ⚠️ ریسک‌های امنیتی: 1️⃣ زیرساخت SD-WAN: مجموعه‌ای از آسیب‌پذیری‌های بحرانی در Catalyst SD-WAN Manager شامل CVE-2026-20209 ،CVE-2026-20210 ،CVE-2026-20224 ،CVE-20…

👍3❤1

9 Jun 2026, 09:32 UTC126 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚠️ هشدار امنیتی سیسکو: آسیب‌پذیری‌های Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager سیسکو از شناسایی سه آسیب‌پذیری امنیتی در Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager (SD-WAN vManage) خبر داده است که می‌توانند منجر به افشای اطلاعات حساس، افزایش سطح دسترسی و دسترسی غیرمجاز به سامانه شوند. این آسیب‌پذیری‌ها مستقل از یکدیگر هستند و بهره‌برداری از یکی از آنها پیش‌نیاز سوءاستفاده از سایر موارد نیست. این آسیب‌پذیری‌ها تمامی استقرارهای Cisco Catalys…

👍1

6 Jun 2026, 13:42 UTC120 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ciscoabrvulnerability-share-7467889432264663040-4OVe/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAADpXtnIBg4Hx-aEPh26IAZHYefm5e3XUZvY

👍1

23 May 2026, 07:54 UTC174 viewsread 12 August 2026

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/fortinetabrcustomerabrsupportabrbulletin-share-7462773388806078478-VQwY/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAADpXtnIBg4Hx-aEPh26IAZHYefm5e3XUZvY

18 May 2026, 09:21 UTC204 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

گزارش جهانی شکاف مهارت‌های امنیت سایبری ۲۰۲۶ @setakmag

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @setakmag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ستاک فناوری ویرا (Fortinet, Dell EMC, Cisco)” (@setakmag), 235 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/setakmag.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.