Channel
@set_kanal_kris_2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
26subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002625773879 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @set_kanal_kris_2 |
| Description | Сеть каналов Кристины |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 16 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/set_kanal_kris_2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 26 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 26 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
46 reactions across 11 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 28.3% | |
| custom 5364334214772714376 | 8 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5260700201563216755 | 5 | 10.9% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 8.70% | |
| custom 5395735893199833575 | 3 | 6.52% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 6.52% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 6.52% | |
| custom 5420361174090797833 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| custom 5260463883872652998 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 2.17% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2025 to 25 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Плела «Луковку» и хочу дать оценку схеме. Руки и ноги плетутся техникой ндебеле. Техника несложная, но лучше заранее потренироваться. В целом схема понятная, но в некоторых моментах отсутствовали метки — вместо них были фотографии с объяснениями. Так как я прячу узелки в бисерины, для меня это небольшой минус. В разделе с закрепом не хватало важной информации. Я попросила закрепить — автор сразу всё закрепила и сп…
🔥4
Шёл совместный проект стоимостью 150 рублей. Схема была полностью доступна в группе: в закреплённых находилась сама схема, граммовка и отдельная корзинка для тех, кто плёл с глазами 6 мм — всё сделано для удобства участников. В посте с продажей заранее был выложен кусочек схемы, поэтому качество все могли увидеть ещё до покупки. Качество схемы неплохое. Леска прорисована одним цветом — чёрным. Бусины прорисованы бе…
❤4
Хочу поделиться отзывом о схеме на лисицу от данного автора @liseonok Проходит совместный проект на данную схему, стоимость составила 150 рублей,но были скидки за подписку на канал/вк. При условии выполнения работы в срок предоставлялся бонус, что стало приятным дополнением. Сама схема выполнена качественно: все метки обозначены прямо на схеме, файл выдавался с ID покупателя. Леска прорисована двумя цветами — красны…
❤3
Хочу оставить отзыв о схеме панды.Покупала я ее ещё у старого автора @Wzerit она сделала схему очень халатно: многие метки не поставлены или стоят неправильно. Во второй части головы все метки одним цветом, на ушах, руках и ногах они были отмечены прямо на размытом фото готовой работы, из-за чего разобраться было сложно. На ногах метки вообще оказались неверные, одной не хватало. Голову закончили без дополнительных …
Была сплела недавно эту уточку,и хочу дать оценку этой схеме Схему купила за 75 звёзд,цена хорошая,за это + Схема качественная,сразу дали файл(очень удобно) Граммовку написали точную,тоже плюсик Единственный минус с метками на круг. Так как круг плетется сразу соединяя две стороны,на эти стороны не поставили метки,всего лишь сделали немного прозрачными(если не всматриваться это вообще не видно)Метеки мне не создали б…
❤2👏1
Схема дешёвая — 15 звёзд, автор отвечала с задержками, качество относительно хорошее, но есть пару больших минусов. Метки звёздочками и капельками плохо видно даже при сильном приближении. Автор поленилась с метками на лапы и шерсть: на лапы — некачественное фото и только с одной стороны, на шерсть — меток нет, описала словами, но плохо. Главный минус — оплату взяли всю, а часть схемы прислали позже; логичнее было бы…
Всем привет. Я Кристина, и теперь этот канал называется «Оцениваю авторки / схемы» Здесь буду оценивать: — саму схему, — насколько она детализирована, — как проработаны дополнительные фишки и мелочи и т.д. Короче, насколько автор реально запарился, а не просто накидал от балды Оценки — от 0 до 10 баллов. Без прикрас. Всё как есть. Присоединяйтесь — будет интересно (и местами жёстко). ꧁ঔৣ☬✞Оцениваю авторки / схем…
❤4🫡3
Channel name was changed to «꧁ঔৣ☬✞Оцениваю авторки / схемы✞☬ঔৣ꧂»
Channel name was changed to «꧁ঔৣ☬✞KRISTINA✞☬ঔৣ꧂»
Channel photo updated
Channel photo removed
https://t.me/kanal_kris_biser Подписываемся)
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @set_kanal_kris_2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 812,915 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@set_kanal_kris_2 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“꧁ঔৣ☬✞Оцениваю авторки / схемы✞☬ঔৣ꧂” (@set_kanal_kris_2), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/set_kanal_kris_2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.