Вот давайте все вместе и на «СестриЦи» приезжайте ❤️

Channel
СестриЦи. Женский клуб
@sestricy_hara
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,085subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002243368163 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sestricy_hara |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sestricy_hara |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 1,085 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 1,087 | +5 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:02 | 1,082 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:56 | 1,081 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 1,086 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 1,083 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 1,086 | +6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 1,080 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 1,079 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 1,085 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 1,080 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:20 | 1,084 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 1,083 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
26 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 84.6% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 15.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
11 июля в Москве Дима с Ниной проводили игру Генные ключи 🔑 Я создала себе это изобилие ✨✨✨ Формируешь запрос, и игра дает ответы один за другим, и все четко, прямо в цель🎯 руководство к действию, мощно 👍 После игры, мы с девочками подружились🤗, я создала наш чат «Сестрички» 🥰 @nina_v_maline Благодарю вас с Димой за этот опыт ! ❤️ Вышли, пжт, наши совместные с девочками фото, которые ты делала на свой телефон посл…
Напишите + или «хочу», если вам интересно
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Почему женщина не может принимать деньги? Самая большая проблема женщины не в том, что она не умеет зарабатывать. А в том, что она не умеет принимать. И дело сейчас совсем не о деньгах. Ответь себе честно: ❤️ Когда мужчина дарит тебе подарок, ты легко его принимаешь? Или сразу хочется сказать: «Ну зачем? Не стоило…» ❤️ Когда подруга предлагает помощь, ты соглашаешься? Или отвечаешь: «Я сама справлюсь». ❤️ Когда …
❤4
☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ Доступна аудио-версия «Женской среды» с Ниной Хара ❤️ Слушай эфир в формате подкаста где удобно: дома, в машине, на прогулке ✨ Как тебе такой формат? Ставь «+» в комментариях, если хочешь после каждого эфира получать аудио-версию, и мы сделаем для тебя это ❤
❤4🔥3
💛 Деньги по-женски: что на самом деле мешает тебе жить в достатке? Вчера на «Женской среде»вместе с Ниной Хара мы говорили о теме, которая касается каждой женщины. Мы привыкли искать причины финансовых трудностей во внешних обстоятельствах: мало возможностей, нестабильная работа, большая ответственность, отсутствие поддержки… Но настоящие ответы находятся гораздо глубже. Во время эфира Нина разбирала реальные жиз…
❤3🔥1
Послание на сегодня ✨ Третья неделя марафона посвящена женским деньгам, поэтому сегодня мы подготовили для тебя особое послание 💸 Сформулируй свой запрос, касаемо денег и вытяни одну из 3 карт. Прочитай послание и рассмотри картинку. Находит ли эта фраза отклик в твоем сердце? О чем она тебе говорит? Делись в комментариях своими мыслями ⤵️
❤2
Как выстроить взаимодействие с деньгами в семье? Нина делится своими лайфхаками👇🏼 https://clck.ru/3V7Xso
❤6
Как удерживать состояние и преумножать материальное благосостояние во времена неопределенности? Говорим в эфире https://clck.ru/3V7Xso
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @sestricy_hara. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kvestkayf · 33,274
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
@dzotti · 22,366
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СестриЦи. Женский клуб” (@sestricy_hara), 1,085 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sestricy_hara.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.