Sticker, posted without a caption
🤓23❤7🥰7🤩2😁2

Channel
@sesezhy301
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
29,886subscribers
+150 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002087357605 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sesezhy301 |
| Created | 21 February 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sesezhy301 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 29,886 | +25 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 29,861 | +16 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 29,845 | +11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 29,834 | +9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 29,825 | +34 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 29,791 | +25 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:11 | 29,766 | +30 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 29,736 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 21 February 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1,193 reactions across 7 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 417 | 35.0% | |
| 👍 | 304 | 25.5% | |
| 🥰 | 230 | 19.3% | |
| 🤡 | 65 | 5.45% | |
| 🤓 | 50 | 4.19% | |
| 💋 | 15 | 1.26% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 1.26% | |
| 💩 | 14 | 1.17% | |
| 😍 | 14 | 1.17% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 0.838% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 0.754% | |
| 😘 | 9 | 0.754% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 0.671% | |
| 🤗 | 7 | 0.587% | |
| 🤨 | 6 | 0.503% | |
| 🥴 | 5 | 0.419% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 0.335% | |
| 🎄 | 3 | 0.251% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 0.251% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.251% | |
| 1 further kind | 2 | 0.168% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2024 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤓23❤7🥰7🤩2😁2
@zhynew_bot 网友自拍的 还是有什么质量高的博主 也可以投稿到我机器人里 我会挑选质量高的发🤓 ps:⚠️注意不要暴露自己的信息 只分享肉体 有啥想和群主说的也可以说
🤓16❤5🥴5😁1
合集总结 点击这里 合集现在更新在这里👇 1. 涩涩不起来~ 2.一起涩涩吧 涩涩的秘密花园 频道可在下方进行投稿~ ✏️️️投稿点击此处 (欢迎投稿~) 《群主的工具箱》 点击👇链接 发送关键词搜索就行啦 💖【涩涩搜索】💖💝【涩涩找片】💝 🍉【涩涩吃瓜】🍉 ❤️爱心发电 支持一下群主的搜索群吧 都可以搜的到的😘 涩涩家族pikpak的资源箱 一定要关注防丢失频道呀 【防丢失频道】 ps:新的聊天群 👉点击此处
❤202👍46🥰19🤡13🔥7😁5👌3👏1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🥰123🤡38👍22❤17💋13💩8🤨6😘5
Sticker, posted without a caption
🥰73👍20❤10🤓8🤗7😍5😘4❤🔥1
❤️涩涩家族群组合集 合集总结 点击这里 🌹【涩涩不起来】 🌈【一起涩涩吧】 🖼【图片赏析】 🎀【PikPak】 🎀【美女鉴赏】 🍉【吃瓜群众】 🌼【秘密花园】 🐽【涩涩吃瓜】 💖【涩涩搜索】 💝【涩涩找片】 🍭点击此处一键关注 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀
👍96❤68🤡14😍5👎4😁4❤🔥3🔥3
IOS苹果用户无法查看成人(色情)频道/群组 如果你进入某个频道/群组遇到如下提示: This channel can't displayed because it was used to spread pornographic content 原因:有人在频道/群组发布成人(色情)内容,被Telegram官方限制了。 解决方法: 登录官方Telegram Web网页版: https://web.telegram.org 打不开请登录旧版: https://web.telegram.org/?legacy=1 注意:必须复制到浏览器打开,验证码是优先发送到之前已登录的Telegram设备/客户端/APP上。如果你在Telegram直接打开链接,就无法看到Telegram上的验证码了。 ➊点击「Settings/设置」 ➋点击「Privacy and Security/隐私和安全」 ➌找到「Sensitive cont…
👍120❤108🥰6❤🔥5💩5👏4😍4🎄3
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @sesezhy301. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 850,701 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@sesezhy301 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“涩涩加油站小屋” (@sesezhy301), 29,886 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sesezhy301.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.