Photo, posted without a caption
😨2❤1

Channel
@serynshowcase
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
65subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001683045030 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @serynshowcase |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/serynshowcase |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 65 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:29 | 66 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 67 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 67 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 22 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
33 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 8 | 24.2% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 18.2% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 9.09% | |
| 😨 | 3 | 9.09% | |
| 🤷♂ | 3 | 9.09% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 6.06% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 6.06% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 6.06% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 6.06% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 3.03% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2024 to 26 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
😨2❤1
*ALERT* GROOMER! Joel has messaged minors telling them they can't wait till they are 18, insinuating Sexual acts, and telling them they can do whatever they want in person because "online it's forever". They have a history of messaging minors and others this type of way and has a few Callouts already. Avoid at all costs! This person has met the minor IRL! Getting more Screenshots of behavior
❤1
BEWARE BEWARE SA CP WARNING THIS USER IS JOINING GROUPS CLAIMING TO BE 15 YEARS OLD AND POSTING NSFW SELF IMAGES AND VIDEO. JOINS GROUPS AND SPAMS CP BLOCK AND REPORT
Channel name was changed to «Beware of this Furry»
Ok, seems like we have some positive feedback. I will be rebranding the Channel As "beware of this furry" I'll be taking any info in regards to anyone that needs to have a beware on Weather it be from theft, drama, racism, SA, etc moving forward just comment If you need to have a beware made and I'll reach out in a timely manner to assess whether the claim is valid to post! TY!
👏3
Would you guys be ok with beware posted here?
💯8👍2😐2
@Oldescus Don't harass them, this is to share if you want a comm, they aren't aware or what that user did
🥰1
Found the artist
So we are gate keeping artists now?
Theirs one artist, where they had 120 subscribers at a minimum of $10 to be able to commission them and they only take 3 slots a month.... Banking $1200 minimum without other commission work. (That's without their other tiers so it could be more)
🤷♂3👎2🤮1😨1
This isn't to attack anyone, I'm just curious on what you guys think about this odd business practice.
👎2🤮1
Me that they had paid $10 a month for 6 months and their request kept getting denied.
👎2💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @serynshowcase. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 520,769 of 1,584,741entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Beware of this Furry” (@serynshowcase), 65 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/serynshowcase.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.