19 Jul 2026, 00:01 UTC17 viewsread 7 August 2026
Comentários ao artigo sobre a obediência cega de Ariel Lazari http://www.montfort.org.br/bra/cartas/ultimas/20260718233852
Channel
Servo por Amor
@servoporamor
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
227subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001142570738 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @servoporamor |
| Created | Between 1 December 2016 and 31 March 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/servoporamor |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 227 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 229 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 231 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 231 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
16 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTC17 viewsread 7 August 2026
A Profecia do Padre Pio a Dom Lefebvre http://www.montfort.org.br/bra/cartas/ultimas/20260716182146
15 Jul 2026, 18:01 UTC17 viewsread 7 August 2026
A falsa obediência de um continuísta: considerações sobre uma orientação de Ariel Lazari http://www.montfort.org.br/bra/veritas/igreja/falsaobediencia
15 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC16 viewsread 7 August 2026
teste10 http://www.montfort.org.br/bra/veritas/ciencia/teste10
2 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC22 viewsread 7 August 2026
O Papa pode promulgar um Rito nocivo à Fé? http://www.montfort.org.br/bra/cartas/ultimas/20260702120758
10 Jun 2026, 12:01 UTC30 viewsread 7 August 2026
O Perenialismo Eclesiológico da igreja Econiana (FSSPX), segunda Resposta ao Garoto Fraternoso http://www.montfort.org.br/bra/cartas/ultimas/20260610113609
6 Jun 2026, 23:01 UTC31 viewsread 7 August 2026
O Esperneio furibundo dos filhotinhos do Olavo de Carvalho http://www.montfort.org.br/bra/cartas/ultimas/20260606223322
13 May 2026, 13:01 UTC40 viewsread 7 August 2026
Padre Pagliarani confessa: "A FSSPX é a última Coca-Cola do deserto!" http://www.montfort.org.br/bra/cartas/ultimas/20260513124123
27 Apr 2026, 20:31 UTC39 viewsread 7 August 2026
A Parapsicologia é ciência? http://www.montfort.org.br/bra/cartas/ultimas/20260427201608
20 Apr 2026, 20:31 UTC34 viewsread 7 August 2026
Dúvidas sobre a alma http://www.montfort.org.br/bra/cartas/ultimas/20260420200734
29 Mar 2026, 17:31 UTC40 viewsread 7 August 2026
Annibale Bugnini e a maçonaria: simples boato ou uma suspeita razoável? Mais uma resposta ao Padre José Eduardo http://www.montfort.org.br/bra/veritas/igreja/bugninimaconaria
15 Mar 2026, 15:31 UTC48 viewsread 7 August 2026
Sobre a última resposta ao tefepista do Instagram http://www.montfort.org.br/bra/cartas/ultimas/20260315152457
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @servoporamor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,277,141 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Servo por Amor” (@servoporamor), 227 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/servoporamor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.