Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Serpihan Rindu

Channel

Serpihan Rindu

@serpihanrindu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,666subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001450570012
TypeChannel
Username@serpihanrindu
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/serpihanrindu

Growth

3,6663,6923,6796 August 2026 — 3,692 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,691 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,684 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,673 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,666 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,662–3,696 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 18:253,666-7
12 Aug 2026, 20:233,673-11
9 Aug 2026, 16:043,684-7
6 Aug 2026, 21:113,691-1
6 Aug 2026, 09:363,692first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 December 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

558 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
30554.7%
👍14225.4%
😢447.89%
🥰376.63%
😐142.51%
🔥61.08%
😭61.08%
👌20.358%
👏20.358%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 558reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2022 to 28 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Apr 2025, 09:30 UTC≈2,250 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Tak pernah sekalipun aku berfikir untuk pergi. Malah kau yang semakin menjauhi. Semoga kau sentiasa baik baik saja. Aku rindu kita yang dulu. Biarkan waktu merawat luka kita. @serpihanrindu

16

23 Mar 2025, 01:10 UTC≈2,900 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Kurangkan tengok orang lain, banyakkan tengok diri sendiri. Then you will see many things unseen before especially in terms of nikmat. @serpihanrindu

13👍2🔥1

23 Mar 2025, 01:09 UTC≈2,880 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Lihat lah kamu. Kamu lelah tapi tidak menyerah. Itu sudah cukup hebat. @serpihanrindu

11

17 Mar 2025, 12:14 UTC≈3,020 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Salam Ramadhan semua. Semoga Ramadhan tahun ni menjadikan kita lebih baik dari sebelumnya . 🤲🏻🤍

11

21 Dec 2024, 01:40 UTC≈3,800 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Sendiri letak harapan, sendiri yang kecewa. @serpihanrindu

🥰8👍43

12 Oct 2024, 19:01 UTC≈4,510 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Tolong jangan pergi, kau adalah harapan terakhirku. @serpihanrindu

12

12 Oct 2024, 18:59 UTC≈4,420 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Kalau aku tak pernah hidup, mesti orang-orang yang aku kenal sekarang, hidupnya lebih mudah dan bahagia, kan? @serpihanrindu

😢9🥰32

10 Jul 2024, 02:55 UTC≈5,920 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Siapa yang cipta konsep “anak perempuan itu milik ayahnya sampai dia bernikah. Anak laki-laki milik ibunya sampai mati” Tak adil kan? Macam mana dengan anak perempuan yang tak rapat dengan ayahnya sejak kecil, ibunya pula lebih memilih dan menjaga anak laki-lakinya. Anak perempuannya harus ke mana? Harus terus pulang ke sisi Tuhan? @serpihanrindu

27👍2👏2😢1

12 Mar 2024, 22:02 UTC≈6,710 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Tidak perlu melontar segala pisau yang kau asah untuk menyakiti hati orang lain. Kau takkan tahu betapa gigihnya seseorang itu meyakinkan diri sendiri bahawa hidupnya akan baik baik saja. @serpihanrindu

29👌2👍2🥰2

28 Feb 2024, 14:50 UTC≈6,510 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Sampai detik ini bukan aku yang kau inginkan… @serpihanrindu

16😢2👍1

28 Feb 2024, 14:45 UTC≈6,240 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ikhlas itu butuh waktu, tapi rindu itu selalu datang tanpa tau waktu. @serpihanrindu

21👍1

25 Feb 2024, 15:26 UTC≈6,060 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Terima kasih kerana selalu ada, jodoh memang di tangan Tuhan, tapi izinkan aku untuk menghargai kehadiranmu buat masa sekarang. @serpihanrindu

15

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @serpihanrindu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,369,841 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Jawatan Kosong Kerajaan & Swasta
@jawatan · 94,232
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Serpihan Rindu” (@serpihanrindu), 3,666 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/serpihanrindu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.