5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,432–5,449 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 18:24
5,434
-2
10 Aug 2026, 00:42
5,436
-6
7 Aug 2026, 00:46
5,442
-5
6 Aug 2026, 10:33
5,447
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:05
5,447
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 1 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.5%
avg views ÷ 5,434 subscribers
Avg views / post
788
1 post measured
Reaction rate
14.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
21 (1 July 2025 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
788
Reactions total
111
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3h 05m
Average length
10m 55s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,724 reactions across 21 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,994
53.5%
🔥
576
15.5%
🙏
480
12.9%
👍
201
5.40%
❤🔥
103
2.77%
🥰
69
1.85%
🕊
60
1.61%
🐳
48
1.29%
💯
46
1.24%
🏆
44
1.18%
💋
18
0.483%
🤗
18
0.483%
🤝
15
0.403%
👏
13
0.349%
👌
6
0.161%
🦄
6
0.161%
⚡
5
0.134%
🤔
4
0.107%
☃
3
0.081%
🍓
3
0.081%
5 further kinds
12
0.322%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,724reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
41
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 21 we hold a reading for · 76%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sergey_dharma. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2025 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Друзья, что на самом деле значит «Блаженны нищие Духом»✨
Если вам нравятся такие разборы, пишите смыслы в комментариях, распакуем..🤗
P.S Внимание, в этом месяце Один из самых сильных периодов десятилетия. С редкими событиями: Парад планет, Коридор затмений, 12-августа полное солнечное затмение и суперлуние одновременно
Участие в церемониях🪷:https://t.me/yagya_online/5618
@sergey_dharma
Друзья🌺 несколько тысячелетий назад, в месяц Дхармы, Будда прочел первую проповедь, своим прежним товарищам по аскезе, в Оленьей роще недалеко от современного Варанаси✨
🕊Он поведал о пути, который пролегает как раз между физическим и духовным миром, между аскетизмом и приверженностью к наслаждениям. Этот путь Будда назвал единственным, который не заведет в тупик. (Срединным)
В этом видео вспомним, какие четыре цел…
Друзья, странно, что мы просим у Бога изменить нашу ситуацию, не зная, что он послал нам её, чтобы изменились мы☝️Почему мы вспоминаем о Боге, в основном когда приходят проблемы
Сегодня я расскажу о прибежище, которое не подведет! Это не просто снятие стресса, это путь к тому, чтобы найти свою ось и почувствовать себя защищенным🌿 Забудьте про временные полумеры, здесь вы найдете истинную поддержку❤️
🌞Солнцестояние!…
Друзья! В очередной раз скажу, что наша, летящая, как миг жизнь, без настоящей духовной практики✨ практически бесполезна🤷♂️ В Эпоху Кали это знают единицы. Задачам и проблемам не будет конца. Поэтому так важно находить время для того, что готовит нас к встрече с бесконечным)
В Тибете есть практика, которая веками хранилась в секрете. Она называется Пхова — искусство переноса сознания🦋 Люди освоившие её, могут уходи…
Друзья, мы привыкли, что всё в этой жизни нужно брать усилием. Качать мышцы, пробивать стены, достигать. Но в духовной практике есть вещи, которые невозможно взять силой. Сегодня мы поговорим о древней способности✨ О той, что способна решить любой ваш вопрос. ШИНЭ..
Ссылка на приложение Dharma Human здесь, уже тестируем: https://t.me/+oirdVfw1qWRjZmFi
Акшая Тритья - один из самых благоприятных периодов: https://t.m…
Друзья! Сегодня явно очевиден кризис сферы отношений, дружбы, честного партнерства. В чем причины?🤞 Представьте, что вы можете заглянуть в душу человека и точно знать, принесут ли вам отношения с ним счастье или разрушит жизнь. В этом видео я поделюсь знанием о 5 уровнях сознания - мы рассмотрим их именно с точки зрения отношений✨
Все кто желает тестировать приложение Dharma Human, добавляйтесь в группу:https://t.me…
Дорогие, любимые женщины! Вы — самые изящные и утонченные творения, которые когда-либо рождала эта Вселенная🌟 Когда смотрю на вас, мне кажется, что сама природа решила однажды превзойти себя и создать совершенство. Спасибо вам за то, что делаете этот мир мягче, а наши сердца — живее!
Вы, словно путеводные звезды, освещаете нам путь во тьме мирской суеты. Рядом с вами даже самый холодный день становится тёплым, а сам…
Ребята привет❤️ как думаете, что было в начале Курица или Яйцо? Возможно ли живое сознание у ИИ? Какие у нас перспективы?
Постараюсь ответить на самые нетривиальные вопросы человечества в этом видео✨
Приятного просмотра🌿
Все кто желает тестировать приложение добавляйтесь в группу:https://t.me/+oirdVfw1qWRjZmFi
Сильный месяц Махашиваратри:https://t.me/yagya_online/4713
@sergey_dharma
Ребята, как вы просили, выкладываю шикарный трек из моего последнего видео✨
Эта песня о пути силы, пробуждении и духе волка,💪 Но прежде чем вы его прослушаете позвольте поделиться небольшой историей о моей давней связи с волками
С Рождеством, храни вас Бог❤️🕊🙏
Ретрит есть 1 место:https://sergey-dharma.ru/
Ягья-церемонии сильнейший Январь - Время Богов:https://t.me/yagya_online/4589
P.S. Трек можно скачать в перво…
🤲 Новая рубрика: «Мудрость на пальцах»
Иногда самые глубокие идеи — самые простые. Их можно понять на ощупь, разложить по полочкам и применить здесь и сейчас.
Здесь будем говорить об осознанности, о новых углах зрения, о древней мудрости — без сложностей, но с сердцем.
Первый выпуск — о том, почему жизнь в наше время сама по себе уже аскеза и величайшая возможность для роста.
Превращаем знание в силу. Слушаем 🎧 О…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @sergey_dharma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 401,042 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sergey Dharma” (@sergey_dharma), 5,434 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sergey_dharma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.