Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SEO-специалист

Channel

SEO-специалист

@seospecialist

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,072subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001141454495
TypeChannel
Username@seospecialist
Created17 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/seospecialist

Growth

5,0725,0985,0856 August 2026 — 5,098 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,089 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,083 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,075 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,072 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,068–5,102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 13:465,072-3
13 Aug 2026, 01:175,075-8
9 Aug 2026, 22:155,083-6
6 Aug 2026, 20:205,089-9
6 Aug 2026, 03:515,098first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 22 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.4%
avg views ÷ 5,072 subscribers
Avg views / post
931
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held22 (22 May 202611 August 2026)
Views total5,588
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 22 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @seospecialist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 May 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC294 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Mira Links — Гибкая система цен и скидок Чем больше объём заказа — тем выгоднее стоимость размещения. 💰 Наши цены: ⭐️ Magic Links — ссылки в новых статьях — от $0,06 до $0,3 ⭐️ Ссылки с главной — от $3 до $5 ⭐️ Сквозные ссылки — от $18 до $25 ⭐️ Guest Posts с возможностью выбора — от $4,5 до $10 ⭐️ Ссылки с главной с возможностью выбора донора — цена рассчитывается индивидуально 🚀 Всегда даём больше, чем вы заказыв

31 Jul 2026, 03:27 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Интересная статистика от Similarweb. Пользователей AI Overviews больше, чем в ChatGPT и других больших языковых моделях (LLM). Но трафика на сайты почти нет. Среди LLM лидирует ChatGPT, трафик которого можно сравнить с трафиком Bing. Он даже обогнал своих партнеров. Его стремительно догоняют Gemini и Claude. Но Claude сильно отстает, он "выстрелил" благодаря хайпу. Если что, шкала логарифмическая. Perplexity зани

29 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @amirhanovlenarPhoto

🔥Шикарная новость! В Гугл Консоль теперь можно добавлять аккаунты социальных сетей!

29 Jul 2026, 05:07 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Что делать с региональными дублями если яндекс, в отличии от гугла не учитывает каноникл, ведущий на поддомен или любой другой домен, отличный от текущего. Нужно закрыть дубли инструментом, который Яндекс понимает. Яндекс рекомендует использовать их собственный тег <meta name="yandex" content="noindex, follow"> Google этот тег игнорирует, поэтому конфликта нет, для гугла ставим каноникл, для яши noindex, follow и

28 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC862 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Mira Links — 🆕 новые форматы размещения Ознакомиться с полным перечнем услуг и актуальными ценами можно здесь. Для быстрого доступа ко всей важной информации используйте навигацию по каналу. Доступные форматы: ⭐️ Magic Links — DR 10+, Traffic 20+ или нужное GEO ⭐️ Ссылки с главной — DR 10+ или Traffic 50+ или GEO ⭐️ Сквозные ссылки — DR 10+ или Traffic 50+ или GEO Стоимость размещений с указанными требованиями по

16 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 12 August 2026

Помните популярный совет по региональному продвижению: Папка для Google, скрыта от Яндекса / поддомен для Яндекса, скрыт от Google Логика этого понятна, но на практике прием не просто не работает, а вредит сайту и вот почему: Robots.txt не прячет от индексации — он только запрещает обход, то есть Disallow в robots.txt запрещает сканирование, но не запрещает индексацию самого URL. Это задокументировано в справке G

15 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Устраняем ваших конкурентов в SEO 1️⃣ Удаляем сайты по DMCA за 1 день 2️⃣ Выключаем домены ваших конкурентов 3️⃣ Убиваем сетки доменов через бан регулятора 4️⃣ Удаляем приложения Google Play навсегда А также предлагаем анти-абуз: 👉 Апелляции DMCA - возвращаем страницы в индекс за 24 часа 👉 Включаем домены после HOLD от регистраторов 👉 Работаем с регуляторами доменных зон 👉 Удаляем фишинг-предупреждения Если вам н

15 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC889 viewsread 12 August 2026

Педро Диас в LinkedIn поднял тему уязвимости Google к поддельным жалобам DMCA. Сейчас любой может вытеснить конкурента из поисковой выдачи, отправляя фиктивные запросы на удаление контента. Google не проводит должной проверки личности заявителя, а процесс рассмотрения таких жалоб вынуждает владельцев сайтов ждать восстановления позиций неделями или даже месяцами. В комментариях отмечается, что даже если Google восст

14 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC846 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Нужны ссылки, которые действительно работают? 🚀 Мы специализируемся на естественном линкбилдинге, который нравится поисковым системам и приносит реальные результаты! 💪 📌 ЧТО МЫ ПРЕДЛАГАЕМ: ✅ Аутрич — максимально естественные белые ссылки, которые подходят для проектов практически любой тематики. ✅ Крауд-маркетинг — живые упоминания на форумах, сайтах с отзывами и тематических площадках. ✅ Reddit-маркетинг — есте

13 Jul 2026, 19:23 UTC878 viewsread 12 August 2026

Попался интересный топик на reddit. Вопрос: "Есть ли смысл заходить в SEO в 2026-м?" Человек хочет начать, но отовсюду слышит, что SEO умерло, что ИИ всех заменит и это карьера без будущего – и теперь сомневается. Самый популярный ответ, если коротко: никто не знает, заменит для ИИ сеошников, поэтому развивайте параллельные навыки ради диверсификации. Там ещё несколько ответов в том же духе. Теперь что думаю я. Ди

8 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Mira Links - Региональные ссылки под любое GEO — от 0.3$ Делаем региональные ссылки любого типа: от дешёвых Magic Links до жирных морд — под любую страну 🌍 Доступные форматы: ⭐️ Magic Links (ссылки в новых статьях) — 0.3$ ⭐️ Региональные ссылки с главной — 5$ ⭐️ Сквозные ссылки — 25$ ⭐️ GP для выбора — 10$ ⭐️ Жирные с МОРД для выбора — $ индивидуально 📌 Также: 🔸 WEB 2.0 статейные — 4 $ 🔸 Крауд — 4 $ 🔸 Профили — 2

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @seospecialist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 327,494 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SEO-специалист” (@seospecialist), 5,072 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seospecialist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.