Channel
@seomagic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
226subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001137797479 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @seomagic |
| Created | Between 1 March 2017 and 30 April 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/seomagic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 226 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:26 | 225 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 224 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:41 | 224 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 3 September 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
59 reactions across 8 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 20 | 33.9% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 30.5% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| ☃ | 3 | 5.08% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 September 2021 to 30 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Серпстат забанил мой личный аккаунт за политические взгляды. Не путайте с банами аккаунтов с почтовыми ящиками в доменной зоне RU. Там другое сообщение. Интересно было бы узнать, что это за взгляды у меня такие.
😁9😱3🤬1
7 лет назад, ещё в предыдущем агентстве (я не знаю, существует ли оно сегодня, простите), мы с коллегами запустили очень дешёвый продукт, желая срубить "нижний сегмент" рынка. https://www.facebook.com/share/1BNmqYANHZ/?mibextid=WC7FNe Пора поделиться результатами, т.к. никакого NDA за такой промежуток времени быть не может. Мы потратили порядка $200 на рекламу, в общей сложности на 3000 просмотров поста получили 3 …
❤2
Почти 8 лет этому видео https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpN4rWNbgS8 ! Мы всегда были уверены, что большинство воспримет крылатую фразу нашего гендира "Счёт и отчёт" как руководство к действию: выставляй счета, делай формальный отчёт и больше можно нифига не делать. Но оказалось, что некоторые наши читатели поняли сказанное правильно. Поняли, так сказать, ключевую боль клиентского SEO. А тем, кто не понял, мы сами …
😁2👍1💯1
Ах да, забыли вчера сказать! С проектами и разовыми задачами писать админу: @bitkey
🌚1
Здравствуйте. Освободилось время для 1-2 проектов. Ну, вы ведь знаете истинный смысл этой фразы. 😉
😁3🤡2😢1
Здравствуйте! Подскажите пожалуйста, на какой стадии оплата счёта и ознакомление с отчётом?
🔥5😁3
Доброго времени суток! В связи с очередными изменениями в алгоритмах Яндекса результата нужно ещё чуть-чуть подождать. Также мы можем купить ещё ссылок для улучшения.. отчёта!
По заявкам поклонников подключены реакции. Ставь лайк, подписывайся на канал, оплачивай счёт, скачивай отчёт.
🔥12☃3🤮2👍1😁1😱1
А я напомню, что данная парадигма была озвучена нашим гендиром ещё 5 лет назад https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpN4rWNbgS8 Сегодня в связи с закрытием сервиса Yandex XML и, соответственно, удорожанием стоимости получения поисковой выдачи через API в 48 раз, она стала ещё более актуальна.
Здравствуйте! Мы снова на связи. И по случаю нашего чудесного возвращения предлагаем вам чек-лист на наши услуги:
🔥3🤣2
Спи*$или и точка.
Я жесткий сеошник 😅😂😂
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @seomagic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бывшие сеошники” (@seomagic), 226 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seomagic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.