Channel
@seogamb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,455subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001186380079 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @seogamb |
| Created | 23 February 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/seogamb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 1,455 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 1,458 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 1,457 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 1,454 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 1,452 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 23 February 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
68 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 26 | 38.2% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 35.3% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 19.1% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2021 to 28 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Бренд-бренд или кросс? Февраль довольно продуктивный по брендовым зацепам (на скринах). FD них тоже бодро идут. Хорошо, мы сеошники, умеем топы занимать. Но дальше нужно экономику считать, куда выгоднее лить. И тут можно сливать на тот же бренд (если принимают свой брендовый трафик) или кроссить (лить на других). Долгосрочно бренд-бренд часто заметно прибыльнее. Хоть тут и ревшара обычно. На кросс-бренде обычно…
👍5🔥3
Ну что, расчехляем боты, сервисы-ускорители индексации и индекснау. И go сообщать Гуглу и Яндексу, что страницы наших конкурентов срочно требуют переобхода... Пока они лежат. 😈 Не финансовая рекомендация. Карма всех догонит 😎 UPD: Ожило.
😁7👍4🔥1
Чанг Май SEO конфа открыла продажи следующего года. В прошлые годы они закрывались в тот же день. Потом было несколько коротких допродаж. Доступны по ссылке.
👍2
Это с доклада Тобиаса. По его мнению топ факторы ранжирования почти все про скорость: • “Freshness” • Time to First Byte • First Contentful Paint • SSL • Cumulative Layout Shift • Critical Rendering Path Optimization • JS Execution Time • Lazy Loading Efficiency И уникальность говорит почти не важна.
😁6👍5🤔3
Я на Chiang Mai SEO Conference. Буду закидывать по ходу дела полезности оттуда. Сегодня был на нескольких докладах о чёрных/серых методах продвижения. Это первая преза, от китайского дорвейщика. Рассказал про: 1. Drop catch system 2. Expired domain revive 3. Spider pool update 4. Click manipulation 5. Serp studying 6. Doorway site on money keyword 7. Cloaking source code and overlay code 8. Pbn sidebar footer back…
🔥11👍5👏2
Посопротивлялся и зашел в топы Google по названию бренда ещё один сайт 🥳 Страна одна из африканских. Особенность кейса в том, что этот сайт – часть сетки из десятка EMD-доменов, перелинкованных друг с другом хрефленгами и ссылками из блока переключения языка под десяток разных стран. Страниц по 15 на каждом. По другим сайтам сети тоже есть неплохие позиции, но трафика пока мало. Например ещё один сайт этой сети …
🔥5
Антикейс: бонусы Зашли у нас в топы пара сайтов, пошел трафик. Оба на дропах. Один обзорник, второй под бренд. Смотрю куда идет траф. На обоих сайтах – на страницы вида "...sign-up-bonus/" Захожу в партнерку, а там сотни регистраций и 0 первых депозитов. Разговариваю с менеджером партнерки, а у них там оказывается платежки отвалились. Предупреждать об этом не обязательно конечно 🤬 Благо у нас клиенты есть в этой…
🔥6👍3
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @seogamb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,161,000 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“iGaming SEO без воды” (@seogamb), 1,455 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seogamb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.