Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SEO-aspirant

Channel

SEO-aspirant

@seoaspirant

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,852subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001140433505
TypeChannel
Username@seoaspirant
CreatedBetween 1 May 2017 and 31 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/seoaspirant

Growth

1,8441,8531,848.56 August 2026 — 1,844 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,844 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,845 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,853 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,852 subscribers1,8526 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,843–1,854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 22:271,852-1
13 Aug 2026, 15:581,853+8
10 Aug 2026, 06:061,845+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:301,844no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:191,844first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 1,852 subscribers
Avg views / post
279
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (25 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,016
Reactions total91
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
28s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

91 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4953.8%
😁1516.5%
1011.0%
🔥77.69%
👀33.30%
🙏33.30%
🤣33.30%
🤡11.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @seoaspirant. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC76 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Небольшая хитрость на Reddit, которую сегодня может применить любой, чтобы быстро получить рекомендации от ИИ — ChatGPT и Google: 1. Создайте пост на Reddit с просьбой порекомендовать какой-либо продукт в соответствующем сабреддите. 2. Подождите, пока на пост поступят настоящие ответы от других пользователей. 3. Когда накопится достаточно комментариев, отредактируйте исходный пост и добавьте обновление, например:

👍3

6 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC164 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Google обновил документ о бюджете сканирования (краулинговый бюджет): каждый сайт начинает с консервативного режима сканирования Google обновил страницу «Оптимизация бюджета сканирования», заявив, что это сделано для «повышения ясности, согласованности терминологии и логичности изложения». Одним из нововведений в документе стало заявление Google о том, что «каждый сайт изначально имеет одинаковый по умолчанию, консе

👍3

5 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC207 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Пример эффективного использования LLM в интернет-маркетинге Система ежедневно автоматически отслеживает тысячи новостных публикаций на предмет их актуальности для PR-возможностей. Как это работает: 📄 У команды есть таблица Google Sheets, в которой они указывают своих клиентов и описывают, какие новости их интересуют. Например: «Candour | Поисковая оптимизация (SEO) и всё, что связано с крупными поисковыми системам

👍4

4 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC236 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаю с интересом наблюдать за судьбой небезызвестного крупного бурж-сайта в органическом поиске, полностью сгенерированного ИИ. 26 июля началось новое резкое падение трафика. Но им не в первой! 🙂

🔥52

4 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC235 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Это не джетлаг: получи 65% RevShare со старта в JetTon Partners 😁 Прямой рекламодатель с лицензированным продуктом JetTon запускает акцию для новых партнеров, и это полный JET: Регистрируйся в августе → приводи от 50 FTD новых игроков → получай 65% RevShare на трафик налитый во время акции Подробнее узнавай у менеджера и подключайся уже сейчас Акция проходит с 17 августа до 20 сентября 😁😁😁😁 Зарегистрироваться На

👍3

3 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC270 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ИИ сделал производство контента почти бесплатным. Сегодня любой может штамповать статьи в промышленных масштабах, рассылать сотни «персонализированных» электронных писем и автоматически откликаться на вакансии. В итоге объём перестаёт быть преимуществом. Когда у всех одни и те же инструменты, массовость превращается просто в шум. Причём побеждают сейчас как раз те, кто действует наоборот: 🔹 решают одну конкретную

😁4🙏3👍1

2 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC306 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Печально наблюдать за тем, как бизнес, особо не разбираясь, винит во всех своих неудачах в органическом поиске Google AI Overviews. Особенно когда эти неудачи чётко следуют за обновлением ядра или спам-апдейтом. Естественно, так делать намного проще, чем признать, что сами накосячили в своей SEO-стратегии. Reddit сейчас именно так и поступает… На скринах — примеры ИИ-переводов контента сайта на немецкий и итальянск

👍32

1 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC285 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В рамках масштабного исследования факторов видимости в больших языковых моделях, проведённого Беном Уиллсом, было проанализировано 403 000 запросов для 10 различных моделей ИИ с целью выявления факторов, влияющих на вероятность получения рекомендации от ИИ. Он проанализировал запросы из 100 различных отраслей, включая различные сферы локального поиска. К наиболее значимым факторам для категории «юридические услуги

👍3🤣1

31 Jul 2026, 19:08 UTC291 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💡 Интересный факт: владелец сайта сделал редирект со старого URL на новый две недели назад, но ChatGPT до сих пор цитирует старый URL. При этом в органическом поиске Google URL обновился на новый в течение 24 часов. В некоторых случаях ИИ может давать устаревшие ссылки 1-2-летней давности, несмотря на переезд. Особенно если ничего специально не делать для исправления ситуации, полагая, что нужно просто «делать сайт

👍3

31 Jul 2026, 08:24 UTC316 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

10% годовых в долларах и 13% — в золоте У OKX появилось предложение для новых пользователей: 🔹 10% годовых на USDC — бонус действует 180 дней; 🔹 13% годовых на XAUT — бонус действует 90 дней. Оба продукта с гибким сроком: средства не нужно блокировать на полгода. Если вы и так собирались держать часть капитала в USDC или цифровом золоте, предложение выглядит любопытно. Почему OKX 💵 10% годовых в валюте 💵 Руководс

👍3🤡1

30 Jul 2026, 17:18 UTC304 views3 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

👀 На что ссылается ИИ: на бренды или на авторитетные источники? В некоторых категориях ИИ-помощники ссылаются на сами бренды, в других — на независимые «авторитетные источники» (паблишеров и сайты с обзорами), но никогда — на бренды. Согласно последнему исследованию Semrush Enterprise AI Visibility Index: 🔹 Из 22 категорий ИИ ссылается на источники, принадлежащие брендам, в 13, на независимые авторитетные источник

👍3

29 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTC332 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Google проиндексировал сотни «приватных» чатов Claude Хотя приватными их можно назвать с натяжкой. Пользователи сами создавали публичные ссылки на отдельные диалоги. Но явно не рассчитывали, что переписки о здоровье, политике, финансах и других чувствительных темах появятся в Google и Bing. В итоге компания, создающая одну из самых продвинутых ИИ-моделей в мире, и журналисты, освещающие тему, споткнулись о базовую

👍7🤣2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @seoaspirant. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 885,411 of 1,481,277entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SEO-aspirant” (@seoaspirant), 1,852 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seoaspirant.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.