Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for sent

Channel

sent

@senttart

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

172subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003490621146
TypeChannel
Username@senttart
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 30 April 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/senttart

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

165172168.518 August 2026 — 165 subscribers18 August 2026 — 165 subscribers26 August 2026 — 168 subscribers1 September 2026 — 169 subscribers10 September 2026 — 168 subscribers18 September 2026 — 170 subscribers3 October 2026 — 172 subscribers18 August 20263 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 46 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 164–173 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Oct 2026, 11:36172+2
18 Sept 2026, 17:22170+2
10 Sept 2026, 15:20168-1
1 Sept 2026, 19:05169+1
26 Aug 2026, 13:12168+3
18 Aug 2026, 12:12165no change
18 Aug 2026, 08:15165first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

452 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 544519502288863325014031.0%
custom 530985815096532681510222.6%
❤4710.4%
❤‍🔥367.96%
custom 5386378241793604411265.75%
💘265.75%
custom 5404680630745178813245.31%
custom 5404332162868584103153.32%
custom 5404829674700283277122.65%
🔥91.99%
custom 540461790274782154051.11%
custom 538891860328003817840.885%
custom 506902455999109720720.442%
🤯20.442%
custom 540248688170947212010.221%
custom 603529982113952896410.221%

Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 452 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @senttart. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC62 views33 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

попытка 2

custom 544519502288863325021custom 54043321628685841036custom 54048296747002832774custom 53098581509653268151custom 54046806307451788131

16 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC85 views38 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

😏

custom 530985815096532681527custom 54046806307451788136custom 53863782417936044115

15 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC84 views27 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

смарите я теперь 3д модельки буду делать вдобавок!! вот этапы работы над первым подопытным (было-стало) пока еще не готово но первые шаги показываю вам вот

custom 538637824179360441116custom 54451950228886332506custom 53098581509653268154custom 54024868817094721201

14 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTC103 views42 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

привета

custom 544519502288863325026custom 53098581509653268159custom 53889186032800381784custom 53863782417936044112custom 54046806307451788131

12 Aug 2026, 23:45 UTC113 views35 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 544519502288863325019custom 54046806307451788138custom 53098581509653268155custom 54043321628685841032custom 54046179027478215401

12 Aug 2026, 22:18 UTC105 views33 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

ни капли интеллекта в этих глазах

custom 530985815096532681518custom 544519502288863325011custom 54043321628685841032custom 53863782417936044111custom 54048296747002832771

28 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC223 views27 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 530985815096532681515custom 54451950228886332508custom 53863782417936044112custom 54043321628685841032

24 Jul 2026, 19:23 UTC267 views38 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

😄 #ribbitrabbit #jax #ribbit 🌟🤩

custom 530985815096532681523custom 544519502288863325010custom 54048296747002832774custom 54046806307451788131

24 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC227 views20 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

кот с шикарной гривой 😏 хчу котофицировать цирковых, как-то уже делала такое, но то было давно 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🎸✨✨ 🌟

custom 544519502288863325017custom 54048296747002832772custom 54043321628685841031

24 Jul 2026, 06:36 UTC184 views17 reactionsread 18 August 2026

если кто захочет проголосовать, оставлю ссылку, заранее спасибо! 🌟 https://t.me/boost/senttart

custom 54451950228886332509custom 54046179027478215404custom 50690245599910972072custom 54043321628685841031custom 60352998211395289641

24 Jul 2026, 06:07 UTC156 views14 reactionsread 18 August 2026

кидайте под этот пост своих персов, время от времени буду выбирать испытуемых для картинок 🕊️ апд. спасибо всем, кто скинул, хорошки ;3

🔥8custom 54451950228886332504❤2

24 Jul 2026, 04:42 UTC163 views14 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤9❤‍🔥4🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @senttart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTCAnonymous Poll18 voters

в анонке как-то был вопрос насчет этого, so.. кому были б интересны ючи/коммишены?

  1. +not shown

Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“sent” (@senttart), 172 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/senttart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.