Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دروس دانشگاه سمنان

Channel

دروس دانشگاه سمنان

@semnan_course

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,803subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002490230731
TypeChannel
Username@semnan_course
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/semnan_course

Growth

1,8031,8101,806.58 August 2026 — 1,810 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,807 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,803 subscribers8 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,802–1,811 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:581,803-4
9 Aug 2026, 17:511,807-3
8 Aug 2026, 18:171,810first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.9%
avg views ÷ 1,803 subscribers
Avg views / post
701
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (26 February 202631 July 2026)
Views total2,102
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥8162.8%
👍2519.4%
👏1310.1%
🔥64.65%
👎21.55%
🤮10.775%
🥰10.775%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 19:56 UTC508 viewsread 8 August 2026

💬 اگه گزینه پیشنهادی رو زدی، موضوع پیشنهادی‌تو حتماً بنویس؛

31 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

این مدل پست‌ها رو ادامه بدیم یا بریم سراغ چیزای جدید؟

  1. 🧠 همین «باور غلط علمی» رو ادامه بدید؛ حال می‌کنم!36%
  2. 🔥 ادامه بدید، ولی موضوعات عجیب‌تر و خفن‌تر47%
  3. 🎓 علمی باشه، ولی کاربردی‌تر برای زندگی و دانشگاه56%
  4. 🎲 کلاً یه موضوع جدید شروع کنید؛ (پیشنهادتون رو کامنت کنید.)13%

The shares total 152%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTC564 viewsread 8 August 2026

📊 یه سؤال مهم از خودتون داریم 👀 چند وقتیه رفتیم سراغ یه سری پست با موضوع 🧠 «باورهای غلط علمی» 🐂 گاو و رنگ قرمز 🐠 حافظه ماهی قرمز 🦋 اثر پروانه‌ای 🐈 گربه شرودینگر 🌌 سیاهچاله 🧪 «بدون مواد شیمیایی» و کلی چیز دیگه... حالا نوبت شماست 😎👇

8 Jul 2026, 17:48 UTC≈1,230 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🧪☕️ اعتراف: منم از چیزای «شیمیایی» یه ترس ته دلم دارم! ☕️🧪 راستشو بخوای، وقتی می‌بینم رو یه محصول نوشته «بدون مواد شیمیایی»، یه لحظه دلم غنج می‌ره که "به‌به، این بهتره". بعد یهو یادم میاد... صبر کن ببینم، خود این محصول از چی ساخته شده؟ از خلأ؟! 😂 نگران نباش، این ترس رو تو از خودت اختراع نکردی. پشت این حس، یه تاریخ واقعی خوابیده: فجایع صنعتی، آلودگی کارخانه‌ها، داروهایی که عوارض دادن. این یه احساسه، نه یه نادانی. 🤝 ا

❤‍🔥5👍2🔥1

7 Jul 2026, 17:29 UTC≈1,040 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

جاروبرقی کیهانی 🚀 بچهها، یه چیزی رو اعتراف کنین. هر وقت کلمه «سیاهچاله» رو می‌شنوین، تصویر یه غول فضایی تو ذهنتون میاد که مثل جاروبرقی خونه تکونی، ستاره‌ها رو میکشه تو شکمش. درسته؟ خب، بذارین یه ترقه بترکونم: دروغ محضه! 😱✨ 🎯 ببین قضیه چیه: سیاهچاله یه ماشین مکش جادویی نیست. در واقع یه توپ بیلیارد خیلی خیلی خفنه که فقط یه گوشه وایساده. گرانشش دقیقاً به اندازهٔ جرمشه. یعنی اگه یهو خورشید عزیزمونو بردارن و یه سیاهچاله

❤‍🔥7🔥2

6 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC965 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

گربه‌ای که از کوانتوم متنفر بود! 🐈☕️ بیا یه باور رایج رو بگم: «گربهٔ شرودینگر هم مرده‌س هم زنده! عجب دنیای عجیب و کوانتومی‌ای!» 😱✨ خب، بچه‌ها، دستگیرش کنید... این دقیقاً همون دروغ بزرگیه که خود شرودینگر اگر زنده بود، از خنده روده‌بر می‌شد! 😂❌ داستان از این قراره: دههٔ ۱۹۳۰، یه سری فیزیک‌دان (بور و هایزنبرگ) اومدن گفتن «واقعیت تا وقتی نگاهش نکنی، قطعی نیست! مثلاً یه الکترون می‌تونه هم‌زمان این‌جا و اون‌جا باشه. جداً

👏7❤‍🔥1👍1

5 Jul 2026, 17:43 UTC926 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🦋 پروانه بیگناهه!! تا حالا شده یکی بهت بگه: «مگه نمی‌دونی اثر پروانه‌ای چیه؟ یعنی یه پروانه تو برزیل بال بزنه، باعث طوفان تو تگزاس میشه!» بعدشم یه نگاه عاقل‌اندَر‌سفیه بهت بندازه؟ 😏 خب، بذار حقیقت رو بهت بگم: این غلطه! ریاضی و فیزیک اصلاً همچین حرفی نزدن. بیا داستان واقعی رو با هم بشنویم. ☕️ ماجرا از یه قهوه شروع شد سال ۱۹۶۱، یه هواشناس باحال به اسم ادوارد لورنتس داشت با کامپیوتر وضع هوا رو شبیه‌سازی می‌کرد. یه ب

❤‍🔥8👍2🔥2

4 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC859 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🐠 حافظه ماهی قرمز فقط ۳ ثانیه هست؟ ۳ثانیه کلیشه‌ای که همه شنیدیم، اما بیا با عینک علم نگاهش کنیم: 🧠 واقعیت: ماهی قرمز اصلاً فراموشکار نیست! تحقیقات دانشگاه بریستول و آزمایشگاههای رفتارشناسی نشون دادن این موجود ریزنقش حسابی حافظه داره: • 🍽️ شرطی میشه: یاد میگیره یه نور یا صدا یعنی غذا در راهه و ماهها بعد هم اینو یادشه. • 🎨 رنگ و شکل تشخیص میده: فرق قرمز و آبی، راهراه و خالخالی رو میفهمه و حفظ میکنه. • 🗺️ ماز حل میک

❤‍🔥9👍2

3 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC903 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🐂 تا حالا فکر میکردی گاوها از رنگ قرمز عصبانی میشن؟ بیا با هم واقعیت رو ورق بزنیم: 👁 گاوها دنیا رو مثل ما رنگی نمیبینن. چشمشون قرمز رو تشخیص نمیده و شنل ماتادور براشون یه تیکه پارچه زرد-خاکستری یا قهوهای کمرنگ دیده میشه. 🎯 چی گاو رو عصبانی میکنه؟ حرکت تند و تهدیدآمیز پارچه، نه رنگش! اگه یه پارچه سفید یا آبی رو هم همینجوری تکون بدی، همون واکنش رو میگیری. 🤫 پس چرا قرمز؟ داستانِ خونِ! رنگ قرمز فقط برای این انتخاب شد

❤‍🔥8👍3🤮1

2 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

حوصلم رسید،

  1. بخونم.29%
  2. نه نرسید.71%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,170 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🧠 دو پاراگراف؛ کل ماجرا پست قبلی درست می‌گفت: مغزت ۱۰۰٪ انرژی می‌سوزونه، هیچ نقطه‌ای خاموش نیست، و آسیب به هر بخشی فاجعه‌آوره. اما این یعنی چی؟ یعنی مغزت مثل یه کارخونه‌ست با همه‌ی چراغ‌ها روشن؛ ولی فقط چند تا دستگاه واقعاً دارن تولید می‌کنن. انرژی صرف «آماده‌به‌کاری» و «ارتباطات داخلی» میشه، نه «تفکر سطح بالا». پس وقتی می‌گی ۱۰٪ استفاده می‌کنم، عددش اشتباهه، اما پیامش درسته: از پتانسیل خلاقیت، حافظه و حل مسئله‌ات خ

❤‍🔥6👏2

1 Jul 2026, 17:09 UTC≈1,030 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🧠 تو فقط ۱۰٪ از مغزت رو استفاده می‌کنی! این جمله رو ول کن. دروغ محضه. بیا با هم این افسانه رو دفن کنیم. 👇 داستان از کجا شروع شد؟ حدود ۱۲۰ سال پیش، یه روان‌شناس گفت: «انسان فقط از بخش کوچکی از توانایی‌هاش استفاده می‌کنه.» نقل قول اشتباه شد، کتاب‌ها روش سوار شدن، هالیوود هم با فیلم «لوسی» میخ آخر رو زد. اما واقعیت علمیه: مغزت ۱۰۰٪ فعاله. همیشه. چرا؟ سه دلیل ساده: ⚡️ ۱. مغزت تشنه‌ترین عضو بدنه فقط ۲٪ وزن بدنه، اما

❤‍🔥8👍1👎1🔥1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @semnan_course. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTCAnonymous Poll85 voters

این مدل پست‌ها رو ادامه بدیم یا بریم سراغ چیزای جدید؟

  1. 🧠 همین «باور غلط علمی» رو ادامه بدید؛ حال می‌کنم!36%
  2. 🔥 ادامه بدید، ولی موضوعات عجیب‌تر و خفن‌تر47%
  3. 🎓 علمی باشه، ولی کاربردی‌تر برای زندگی و دانشگاه56%
  4. 🎲 کلاً یه موضوع جدید شروع کنید؛ (پیشنهادتون رو کامنت کنید.)13%

The shares total 152%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTCAnonymous Poll124 voters

حوصلم رسید،

  1. بخونم.29%
  2. نه نرسید.71%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Jun 2026, 12:42 UTCAnonymous Poll355 voters

امتحانا حضوری بشه یا مجازی بمونه؟

  1. مجازی👍79%
  2. حضوری🔥10%
  3. من دانشگاه میخوام🤤9%
  4. حرفم چیز دیگست، پایین مینویسم.😎2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,096,449 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دروس دانشگاه سمنان” (@semnan_course), 1,803 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/semnan_course.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.