Channel
Selenophile🌘✨
@selenophilewi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
64subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002199385055 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @selenophilewi |
| Description | «تو در منی؛ مثل عکس ماه در چشمانت، در منی، و دور از من.»🌘✨👀 . . . 𝗺𝗲 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸: https://t.me/selenophilewi |
| First recorded | 21 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/selenophilewi |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:11 | 64 | no change |
| 15 Oct 2026, 22:20 | 64 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:30 | 65 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ahangebass · 43,873
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 1 September 2026
@Ali_safari_76 · 19,602
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 24 September 2026
@Pinteresties · 39,763
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 4 September 2026
@bislull · 35,324
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Selenophile🌘✨” (@selenophilewi), 64 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/selenophilewi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.