👥 گروه اصلی
@selectptechat
📡 کانال اصلی
@selectptech
👩🏻💻🧑🏻💻کانال تمرین
@selectptepractice
📅 لینک تقویم تمرینها
https://calendar.google.com/calendar/b/2?cid=djZzNHU3bHQyY2k5YjZrZWc2aXRtdjhwc2dAZ3JvdXAuY2FsZW5kYXIuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbQ
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,992–5,007 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 16:53
4,994
-9
7 Aug 2026, 08:34
5,003
-2
6 Aug 2026, 15:02
5,005
first reading
Engagement
53 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.46%
avg views ÷ 4,994 subscribers
Avg views / post
223
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
53
of 53 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
53 (3 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
11,579
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,750
Videos
≈3
Links
≈401
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
سلام به همراهان گروه بزرگ سلکت PTE؛
امروز برای تمرین collocation در خدمتتون هستم.
تمرین امروز شامل ۵ سوال چهار گزینه ای خواهد بود که همگی از متن های ریدینگ امتحان انتخاب شده اند❌
راس ساعت ۱۵ به وقت ایران سوال هارو میفرستم 🕰
آرزومند درخشش شما 🏆
#collocation
@selectptech
@Parisa_Najivash
✅ SST Sample Answer:
Many people are afraid of going to the dentist, and it can lead to poor oral health. Firstly, although cognitive behavioral therapy works well for this problem, it is not widely available. Secondly, our team made an app that teaches the basics of this therapy, and if users are still scared, we offer them a private online session with a specialist. Finally, this makes the treatment easier to acce…
💬 #Transcription :
Having fear or anxiety about going to the dentist is extremely common. Dental fear can mean anything from worrying and ruminating prior to an appointment, being miserable and muscling one’s way through, to terror and avoidance of the dentist altogether.
When people avoid the dentist, they tend to only go for emergency care. These emergency appointments tend to be more intense and painful than rou…
🤝 سلام خدمت دوستان عزیز 💙
📝 راس ساعت 09:00 با یک تمرین Summarize Spoken Text در خدمتتون هستم
⌚️ زمان مجاز برای شرکت در تمرین 10 دقیقه
📝 تعداد کلمات نوشته شده رو مشخص کنید
🎯 نمره هدف رو مشخص کنید
🙏 پیشاپیش از کسانی که بعد از STOP پاسخشون رو ارسال میکنند و فیدبک نمیگیرن معذرت میخوام.
❌ به پیام های ادیت شده فیدبک داده نمیشود ❌
Keep your hopes up 🤞
#SST
@Kia_Sajad
@SelectPTEch
Rising temperatures are accelerating glacier retreat, and some glaciers are expected to disappear within 20 years. This rapid melting leads to increased rockslides, forcing the closure of mountain paths. Meltwater also carries fine sediment, which contains harmful substances like uranium and nickel, posing risks to water supplies. Thawing permafrost is destabilizing mountain slopes even more, making rockfalls more fr…
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @selectptepractice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 18 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
8. The company attempted to ________ the seriousness of the financial crisis.
A) obfiscate53%
B) obfuscate47%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 47,818 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Select PTE Practice Channel” (@selectptepractice), 4,994 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/selectptepractice.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.