Posted without readable text
❤11🔥6🥰3🙏1

Channel
@sekretskris
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
6,348subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001860233287 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sekretskris |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sekretskris |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 02:47 | 6,348 | -24 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:38 | 6,372 | -9 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 19:38 | 6,381 | -15 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:01 | 6,396 | +3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:28 | 6,393 | -8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:10 | 6,401 | -8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 05:51 | 6,409 | -10 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 20:51 | 6,419 | -3 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 6,422 | -29 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 02:15 | 6,451 | -42 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 6,493 | -40 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 6,533 | -15 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 6,548 | -10 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 6,558 | +62 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 6,496 | +11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:47 | 6,485 | +24 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 6,461 | -23 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 6,484 | +24 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 6,460 | +87 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 6,373 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (6 June 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,614 |
| Reactions total | 164 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 12:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
760 reactions across 28 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 278 | 36.6% | |
| 🔥 | 240 | 31.6% | |
| 💯 | 67 | 8.82% | |
| 🙏 | 31 | 4.08% | |
| 😍 | 25 | 3.29% | |
| ❤🔥 | 22 | 2.89% | |
| 🤣 | 16 | 2.11% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 1.84% | |
| 💋 | 14 | 1.84% | |
| 💔 | 12 | 1.58% | |
| 🍓 | 8 | 1.05% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 1.05% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 0.921% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 0.789% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 0.789% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.395% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.395% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 760 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sekretskris. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 June 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (28.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Posted without readable text
❤11🔥6🥰3🙏1
💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔 Кошки сбор закрыт! Ссылку удаляю , мы собрали!!!!!!!! Я счастлива, что вы у меня есть Рассказала о ситуации с болезнью , в конце послание для тех, кому сейчас плохо 🙏
❤13🙏9
Кошки, нужна помощь 💔💔💔 Мне очень трудно у вас просить, но ситуация экстренная и я должна использовать все ресурсы, чтобы помочь . Этот год - просто год рака, сначала моя тетя , которой уже удалили, потом отец с неопрерабельной опухолью, которую мы сейчас лечим, а сегодня пришла еще одна страшная новость. Моя подруга, многие из вас видели ее со мной на мероприятиях, молодая девушка, моя ровесница мать троих детей - о…
❤14🙏10💯5
Напоминаю❗️ Представь, что напротив тебя сидит самая жёсткая и честная подруга, наливает тебе вина, смотрит прямо в глаза и говорит: Дорогая, ты у себя одна. Пиздец, как одна! Нет, это не значит, что вокруг никого нет и все тебя бросят. Это значит, что единственный человек, с которым тебе придётся прожить абсолютно всю жизнь -ты сама. Муж может влюбиться в другую, уйти. Может заболеть или не дай бог, умереть. Даже …
❤17🔥7👏3🙏3
Соскучилась по нашим Шлюшим марафонам 😈 Кто тоже? Ставьте 😍 А пока делюсь одной из техник уже не помню какого потока)))) Фишка здесь в звуке - посмотрите видео, не смотря на музыку - слышно. Все звуки секса: хлюпающие, шлепающие , чавкающие - офигеть какой возбудитель. Особенно если мужчина аудиал и восприимчив именно к звукам. Он обращает внимание на голос, любит музыку, остро реагирует на шум, ему нравятся слышать…
😍17🔥11❤5
Самый неожиданный контент от меня или что бывает с больной психикой при отсутствии реализации сексуальных фантазий? Кошки, сегодня у нас сексология, от которой мурашки по коже. Что общего у мужчины, который делал костюмы из женской кожи, убийцы с проблемами эрекции и примерного семьянина, которого возбуждали страдания других людей? Сейчас расскажу. 🔴 Эд Гейн после смерти матери вскрывал женские могилы и создавал оде…
🔥10❤2💯2
Та самая практика из эфира, кто еще не попробовал - вот вам вдохновение и план на выходные 🫦 Сегодня, обычный день, но для тебя - особенный. Тот день, когда ты выбираешь никуда не спешить, чтобы посвятить время только своей сексуальности. Ты и твое тело. Не антицеллюлитный массаж, не крем от морщин, не очередная жесткая диета, только ты и удовольствие ❤️🔥 Набери себе ванну, включи на фоне мантры или медитацию, доб…
🔥9❤3🥰2🙏1
Posted without readable text
🔥12❤9🍓5🤣1
Фишки в сексе + лингам
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤2🔥1🤣1😍1
Не знаю как вы, а я до сих пор в шоке, что наконец в доступе появились действительно классные секс-игрушки для мужчин, например, вот) Тут и вакуум и скорость и молниеносный оргазм. А еще такие штуки очень полезны для контроля эакуляции, у кого высокая чувствительность и быстро наступает оргазм - для вас это тренировка. Но, считаю - этот девайс создан для игр в паре 🔥 как симуляция секса втроем или банально когда у…
🔥6❤2💯2🤣1
Это сделает твою женщину мартовской кошкой. Мужчинам пост ❤️ Собрала для вас самые частые жалобы от участниц Шлюших марафонов и вот, что скажу:женщины не ждут и не требуют от вас невозможного. Никто из участниц не писал про яхты, бриллианты каждый день или сделать тату с ее именем. Все гораздо проще, чтобы женщина была раскрепощена в сексе - вы должны быть рядом с ней в жизни, в быту, в усталости. Не +1 , не сосед…
❤21💯15🔥5🤣1
Фут-фетиш 🔥 Этот фильм вышел, когда мне было всего 2 года, посмотрела его лет в 10 и до сих пор считаю этот момент самый сексуальным в истории 😍 Просто вау! Посмотрите на движения в танце, на ее невербалику, подачу. Не откровенность - нет. Откровенных женщин показывали в фильмах тысячами. Цепляет то, что героиня не просит на неё смотреть. Она ведёт себя так, будто внимание зала уже принадлежит ей. Она не бегает гла…
🔥13❤5🍓3🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @sekretskris. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Фишки в сексе + лингам
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“68 и 1 секрет Крис” (@sekretskris), 6,348 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sekretskris.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.