بعدش فیش خودتون به پشتیبانی ارسال کنین💎 @poshtibanikiana

Channel
ثروت با عزت نفس💸🗣💪🏻
@sefroyekammm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
111subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 3 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003950404119 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sefroyekammm |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sefroyekammm |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:10 | 111 | -1 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 14:19 | 112 | +15 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 20:22 | 97 | no change |
| 3 Oct 2026, 19:47 | 97 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 41.6%
- avg views ÷ 111 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 46.1
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.69%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 September 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 923 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Oct 2026, 20:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤩 | 8 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ظرفیت دوره کلا 20 نفره 💎بهای اصلی دوره 4/900 هست 💰امروز میتونید فقط با 890 تومن ثبت نام کنین✅
✅✅✅چرا دوره مدیتیشن عشق باید ثبت نام کنم؟
یه دوره ی جدید داریم به اسممدیتیشن عشق💎🗣😍 یک مدیتیشن عمیق برای کار روی ♦️عزتنفس، ♦️ترس از رها شدن ♦️ و وابستگی عاطفی + یک تمرین قدرتمند برای اینکه در رابطه وابسته نباشی و جذابیت و ارتباط سالمتری بسازی.
🤩2
سلامییی به بهترینای اینده بریم برای معرفی دوره مدیتیشن عشق هستیدد؟؟؟😍😍😍✅💪🏻
فردا راجب سرفصل دوره مدیتیشن عشق برات میگم🌟❤️🔺✅
«مدیتیشن عشق» برای همین مرحله طراحی شده ؛ برای اینکه فقط درباره ارزشمندی و وابستگی حرف نزنیم، بلکه زمانی رو به خودمون اختصاص بدیم و به شکل عمیقتری با این الگوها کار کنیم. 🧠🤍 این چند روز دیدی بعضی از باورهای فایل واقعاً درباره تو بودن، این دوره میتونه شروعی باشه که تو خیلی وقت پیش باید شروعش میکردی..!
پس مسئله فقط این نیست که: 🌎🔥« دوره مدیتیشن عشق رو داشته باشم یا نه؟» سؤال مهمتر اینه: «آیا میخوام روی باورهایی که سالها با خودم حمل کردم، آگاهانه کار کنم؟» چون تغییر، از جایی شروع میشه که تصمیم میگیری دیگه فقط نتیجهی الگوهای قدیمی نباشی.
و نکته اینجاست: این اتفاقها لزوماً به این معنی نیست که تو ضعیفی یا نمیتونی خودت رو دوست داشته باشی. گاهی فقط یک الگوی قدیمی هنوز فعال شده. اما وقتی این الگو رو نمیشناسیم، ممکنه بارها همون احساس و همون واکنش رو تکرار کنیم. 🧠
ممکنه دوباره وارد رابطهای بشی که توش بیشتر از چیزی که دریافت میکنی، انرژی بذاری. ممکنه باز هم برای گرفتن توجه، خودت رو فراموش کنی. 🗣🧠🌔ممکنه با کوچکترین فاصله یا بیتوجهی، ذهنت دوباره بره سمت همون فکر قدیمی: «نکنه من کافی نیستم؟»
یه سؤال مهم برای امروز…🤦♀🔺👇 اگر باورهایی مثل «من کافی نیستم»، «باید تأیید بشم تا ارزشمند باشم» یا «ممکنه ترکم کنن» رو تغییر ندیم، فکر میکنی این باورها قراره کجا خودشون رو نشون بدن؟ توی انتخابهامون، توی رابطههامون، و حتی توی برخوردی که با خودمون داریم…
🗣🌖«دوره مدیتیشن عشق» دقیقاً برای همین ساخته شده. ♦️توی این مسیر روی باورهای مربوط به ارزشمندی، ♦️ترس از رها شدن، ♦️وابستگی عاطفی ♦️و رابطهمون با خودمون کار میکنیم. هدف این نیست که فقط به خودت بگی «من ارزشمندم»؛ میخوایم با تمرینهای عمیقتر، فرصت بدیم این مفهوم از یک جمله، به یک تجربه درونی تبدیل بشه. 🧠✨ اگر احساس میکنی بعضی از باورهایی که توی فایل پیدا کردی هنوز روی احساسات و رابطههات اثر میذارن، این دوره م…
🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sefroyekammm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ثروت با عزت نفس💸🗣💪🏻” (@sefroyekammm), 111 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sefroyekammm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.