Channel
@seemantic
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
208subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001657183331 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @seemantic |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/seemantic |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 19:57 | 208 | +3 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 205 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 206 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 207 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 208 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 208 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 30 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
19 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 6 | 31.6% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 21.1% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 21.1% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2025 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Приветствуем! 👋 Помните ваших старых голосовых роботов? Они работали по скриптам, без нейросетей — и это было ок в 2021–2024 годах. Сейчас рынок ушёл вперёд. И мы вместе с ним. Что изменилось в 2025–2026: Голосовые боты нового поколения — теперь они работают на нейросетях. Говорят естественно, понимают контекст, адаптируются под клиента. Это уже не роботы, а AI-ассистенты. послушать кейс послушать кейс послушать ке…
🔥2
🚌 А все) теперь и функции диспетчера на искусственном интеллекте #голосовыероботы #leads #найм #искусственныйинтеллект #AI #холодныезвонки #холодныйобзвон #приемзвонков #менеджерпродаж #технологии #лидогенерация
🚀 Пристегнитесь! Технологии шагают вперед на всех скоростях! Компания Higgsfield AI выпустила уникальную технологию Draw-to-Video, которая способна изменять любые видеокадры с помощью простых текстовых (📌) команд!!! Этот инструмент представляет собой новый уровень взаимодействия с контентом, позволяющий буквально рисовать изменения прямо на экране, используя лишь короткие инструкции. 🎬 Тестировщики добавили кошку в…
🔥2🆒1
🎉 Мы благодарим всех, кто принял участие в опросе и продолжает отдавать свои голоса! В голосовании позиции разделили поровну Технологии и Области применения голосовых роботов. С этого и продолжим 😉 Свежая порция технологий - в студию
⁉️ Что вам интересно знать про роботов?
The shares total 199%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤬 Вы все еще собеседуете кандидатов сами? ✅ Скачать книгу Программные роботы в бизнесе ✅ Смотреть наши кейсы в Телеграм боте ✅ Записаться на консультацию #голосовыероботы #leads #найм #искусственныйинтеллект #AI #холодныезвонки
👍1🥰1
А ваш робот так умеет? 😉 #голосовыероботы #маркетинг #leads #partners #холодныйобзвон
👏1🔥1
📍 Сколько стоит пропущенный входящий? Вы когда-нибудь подсчитывали, сколько стоит вовремя не отвеченный звонок? А мы посчитали:) и, честно говоря, это цифры, на которые больно смотреть, но без них не понять - а куда уходят инвестицию в рекламу и маркетинг? 📉 По данным статистики около 30% обращений в бизнесе, где нет автоматизации, остаются без ответа. Одна треть клиентов, в которых вложился маркетинг и собственник…
🎉 А вот и первые отзывы про внедрение у себя новых AI-администраторов
👍2🔥1
File, posted without a caption
📞 Еще в одном салоне заработал AI-администратор. Собственник сняла с себя рутину по контролю записей и найму администраторов. Теперь ни один звонок клиента не пропущен! 📍 Хочешь так же? Записывайся на встречу, и узнай как применить AI-администратора в твоем бизнесе +7 (936) 548-16-77
👍1👏1
Что изменилось? 🚀 ТЕХНОЛОГИИ, точнее их доступность для бизнеса. Искусственный интеллект теперь можно применить в любой, даже начинающей компании. Мы выпустили умных голосовых роботов, которые сами знают как общаться с клиентами, ведя их к цели разговора. 🎯 Познакомься с новым AI-администратором, который запишет абсолютно всех клиентов, и не пропустит ни одного звонка. Да, кстати. он сам внесет запись в yclients, …
🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @seemantic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
⁉️ Что вам интересно знать про роботов?
The shares total 199%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2025 to 15 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SeeMantic, голосовые роботы, чат-боты, автоворонки продаж, эффективные продажи ИИ” (@seemantic), 208 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seemantic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.