Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for صدای خوی

Channel

صدای خوی

@sedaykhoy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,191subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001275812064
TypeChannel
Username@sedaykhoy
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sedaykhoy

Growth

3,1913,1983,194.56 August 2026 — 3,198 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,198 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,196 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,193 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,191 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,190–3,199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 07:123,191-2
12 Aug 2026, 08:123,193-3
9 Aug 2026, 04:113,196-2
6 Aug 2026, 09:313,198no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:283,198first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.94%
avg views ÷ 3,191 subscribers
Avg views / post
94.0
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 51 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held51 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,792
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 37s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
830.8%
🖕519.2%
👎415.4%
👏311.5%
😁311.5%
👍27.69%
🤬13.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC74 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

عکسی کمتر دیده شده از مراسم محرم در روز عاشورا در دوره قاجار مکان میدان توپخانه شهر خوی صدای خوی در روبیکا 👇 https://rubika.ir/sedayekhoy خط ارتباط با ما @Matbuatifarhang

1

7 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC81 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🌸✨شبتون قشنگ✨ الهی 🙏 در انتـــــهای شب به فرشتــگانت بسپـــــار در لحظه لحظه نیایش دوستـــــان مرااز یـــــاد نبرند شبتـــــون_زیبا🌸🌙 💖 صدای خوی در روبیکا 👇 https://rubika.ir/sedayekhoy خط ارتباط با ما @Matbuatifarhang

1

7 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC87 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔹ذوالقدر همچنان دبیر شعام است 🔹️اطلاعات رسیده به "سازندگی" حاکی از آن است که رئیس‌جمهور با استعفای "محمدباقر ذوالقدر" از دبیری شورای ‌عالی امنیت ملی موافقت نکرده است و به او گفته که کماکان به مأموریت محول‌شده با قوت و قدرت ادامه دهد. صدای خوی در روبیکا 👇 https://rubika.ir/sedayekhoy خط ارتباط با ما @Matbuatifarhang

🤬1

7 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC110 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

آکسیوس: مذاکره‌کنندگان ایرانی منتظر تایید نهایی شعام در مورد توافق با عمان و آمریکا هستند. «انتظار داریم این تایید به زودی انجام شود.» صدای خوی در روبیکا 👇 https://rubika.ir/sedayekhoy خط ارتباط با ما @Matbuatifarhang

7 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC119 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔹سنای ایالات متحده، طرح «تحریم روسیه و ایران» به نام «لیندسی او. گراهام» را با رای 86 به 11 تصویب کرد ▫️این طرح اکنون به مجلس نمایندگان ارسال می‌شود که پس از تعطیلات ماه آگوست، فعالیت خود را از سر خواهد گرفت. ▫️مهم‌ترین بخش این طرح، اختیارات لازم را به رئیس‌جمهور می‌دهد تا تعرفه‌هایی تا سقف 100 درصد را بر واردات از پنج کشور بزرگ خریدار نفت خام یا گاز طبیعی روسیه اعمال کند. ▫️این طرح همچنین تحریم‌های علیه ایران را ت

7 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC151 viewsread 7 August 2026

بقائے در واکنش به سخنان ترامپ:پیش از آنکه کسے بتواند ادعاے «غنائم جنگی» کند،ابتدا باید در جنگ پیروز شده باشد 🔹رئیس‌جمهور آمریکا گفته است:«غنائم از آنِ فاتحان است.»او همچنین ادعا کرده که «ما مقدار زیادے نفت از ونزوئلا می‌گیریم؛ میلیاردها و میلیاردها بشکه نفت… و همین کار را درباره جمهورے اسلامے ایران نیز انجام می‌دهیم.» 🔹این حرف‌ها انسان را به یاد رمان «تبصره ۲۲» (Catch-22)اثر جوزف هلر می‌اندازد؛ همان رمانے که در آن

7 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC136 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

پیشنهاد سخنگوی دولت اصلاحات: ایران به توافق مکه ملحق شود صدای خوی در روبیکا 👇 https://rubika.ir/sedayekhoy خط ارتباط با ما @Matbuatifarhang

🖕1

7 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC134 viewsread 7 August 2026

مقاومت اسلامی عراق: تعویق پاسخ، به معنای معامله بر سر خون شهدا نیست بیانیه مقاومت اسلامی عراق: 🔹بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم (وَلَا تَهِنُوا وَلَا تَحْزَنُوا وَأَنتُمُ الْأَعْلَوْنَ إِن كُنتُم مُّؤْمِنِينَ) (و ناامید نشوید و غمگین نباشید، در حالی که شما برتر هستید، اگر ایمانتان را حفظ کنید.) 🔹در پاسخ به درخواست مجاهد (آبو حسن العامری) و در همراهی با مواضع شرافتمندانه برخی از رهبران سیاسی، تصمیم گرفته شد پاسخ نظامی که قر

7 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC126 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

پزشکیان: من اگر بخواهم استعفا بدهم رسما اعلام می‌کنم! / آنهایی که به تفاهم‌نامه می‌گویند شکست، حرف اسرائیل را می‌زنند 🔹برای جهالت انسان همین قدر کافی است که نداند قدرتش چقدر است. 🔹یا رهبری را نشاختند یا منطق و عقل سرشان نمی شود. ما به آمریکا چه دادیم؟! کلی دستاورد داشتیم. 🔹آنچه به اسم تفاهم نامه نوشتیم با قدرت از آن دفاع می کنیم، آنهایی که می خواهند آن را شکست لقب بدهند من می گویم که بی انصاف هستند و این چیزی است

7 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC120 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

همتی: اظهارات وزیر خزانه‌داری آمریکا با برخی مواضع قبلی در تعارض است 🔹در پی اظهارات وزیر خزانه‌داری آمریکا درباره احتمال دستیابی ایران و آمریکا به توافق در روزهای آینده، فارغ از اینکه این توافق انجام شود یا نه، همین اظهارات با برخی مواضع قبلی درباره قریب‌الوقوع بودن فروپاشی اقتصاد ایران در تعارض است 🔹 تردیدی نیست که اقتصاد ایران با مشکلاتی روبه‌روست؛ اما این واقعیت با تصویری که پیش‌تر از فروپاشی قریب‌الوقوع اقتصاد

7 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC114 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

یمن به ترکیه و پاکستان هشدار داد: هر کشوری که در کنار عربستان قرار بگیرد، متجاوز است 🔹مهدی المشاط، رئیس شورای عالی سیاسی یمن در روزی که توافق مکه میان عربستان و پاکستان و ترکیه امضا شد، هشدار داد: «هر طرفی که بخواهد در تجاوز و محاصره ۱۲ ساله عربستان علیه یمن مشارکت کند، متجاوز محسوب می‌شود؛ حتی اگر این مشارکت را با عناوین و شعارهای فریبنده توجیه کند.»/ جماران صدای خوی در روبیکا 👇 https://rubika.ir/sedayekhoy خط

👏1

7 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC134 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔻ظرفیت نیروگاه‌های تجدیدپذیر ۴.۶ برابر شد وزارت نیرو: 🔹ظرفیت نیروگاه‌های تجدیدپذیر کشور به ۵۸۰۰ مگاوات رسید. 🔹این میزان که در ابتدای دولت چهاردهم ۱۲۵۰ مگاوات بود، اکنون با رشدی ۴.۶ برابری همراه شده است./فارس صدای خوی در روبیکا 👇 https://rubika.ir/sedayekhoy خط ارتباط با ما @Matbuatifarhang

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @sedaykhoy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 135,267 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“صدای خوی” (@sedaykhoy), 3,191 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sedaykhoy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.