Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 57 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68–101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Oct 2026, 21:37
97
+1
18 Sept 2026, 03:18
96
+4
9 Sept 2026, 10:36
92
+4
31 Aug 2026, 03:13
88
+7
24 Aug 2026, 21:08
81
+4
16 Aug 2026, 08:17
77
+5
9 Aug 2026, 23:01
72
no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:01
72
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
55 reactions across 16 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
49
89.1%
custom 5285400932144652795
6
10.9%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
خیانت رو نبخش، آدمی که از قصد بهت آسیب زده رو حذف کن و به کسی که ترکت کرده فرصت ورود دوباره به زندگیت رو نده، نه به خاطر اینکه کارشون اشتباه بوده، بلکه به خاطر اینکه تو با این افراد آینده ای نداری.
آدمی که یک بار بهت خیانت کرده فردا توی شغلت، توی خونه و زندگیت، توی کارت هم بهت خیانت می‌کنه. آدمی که تا تقی به توقی می‌خوره بجای وایسادن و حل کردن مشکل می‌گه خداحافظ و می‌ره فردا توی شرایط سخت و موقعی که بیشتر از همیشه نی…
من گفتم عیبی نداره، ولی بعدش دیگه از ته دل نخندیدم، دیگه نتونستم اعتماد کنم، یه قسمتی از من برای همیشه از دست رفت، ذوقم کور شد، برق چشم‌هام خاموش شد، من گفتم عیبی نداره ولی تا دلت بخواد عیب داشت.
🌸کافه آرامش صبا☕🍃
هیچ عامل بیولوژیکی‌ای وجود نداره که یه زن یا مرد رو مجبور به خیانت توی رابطه کنه.
خیانت، یه انتخاب کاملا آگاهانه‌ست.
حقیقت همینه؛ قبولش کنید
🌸کافه آرامش صبا☕🍃
به نظرم
خيليا فقط به خاطر يه نفر زنده‌ن.
يعنی وقتی غم دنيا ميريزه تو دلشون و
دنبال دليل واسه
زندگى مى گردن، ته دلشون ميگن:
«هنوز فلانى هستا»
محمود درويش اين موضوع رو قشنگ
گفته:
«هربار كه نگاهت مى‌كنم جمله اى آشنا
به ذهنم مى رسد؛
در اين سرزمين هنوز چيزى هست
كه ارزش زندگى كردن دارد.»
🌸کافه آرامش صبا☕🍃
فکرمون رو درگیر آدم‌هایی نکنیم که نمیدونیم کی و کجا ارث باباشون رو خوردیم که باهامون بد شدن، ما به هیچ وجه مسئول، حس حسادت و دورویی بقیه نیستیم!
🌸کافه آرامش صبا☕🍃
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @sedasabaho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎙️کافه آرامش صبا🌸🍃” (@sedasabaho), 97 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sedasabaho.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
