Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ADES✨️

Channel

ADES✨️

@seda_artist

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,753subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002262903830
TypeChannel
Username@seda_artist
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/seda_artist

Growth

1,7511,7551,7536 August 2026 — 1,751 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,754 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,755 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,753 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,750–1,756 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:131,753-2
10 Aug 2026, 10:061,755+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:471,754+3
6 Aug 2026, 12:011,751first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.0%
avg views ÷ 1,753 subscribers
Avg views / post
841
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held14 (24 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total11,777
Reactions total2,076
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,076 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
85941.4%
custom 525572989360958484532215.5%
custom 524898198459149735524011.6%
❤‍🔥23311.2%
custom 52539082777202712601356.50%
custom 5969722821650157544703.37%
😭683.28%
custom 5330489477343235287643.08%
🔥502.41%
💘281.35%
💔70.337%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,076reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 14 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @seda_artist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 04:13 UTC398 views67 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну что ж... я придумала аж две идеи, но теперь разрываюсь между тем, какой пейринг рисовать 🚬

53custom 525390827772027126014

5 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC513 views115 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

БЛИН я вспомнила гениальный диалог, который у меня однажды случился в тик-токе, и меня до сих пор разрывает с него ПОСМОТРИТЕ ПОЖАЛУЙСТА

custom 525572989360958484575🔥25custom 5330489477343235287105

3 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC506 views173 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @brumkarmiaPhoto

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🦢 кто-нибудь прикасался к Нилу, пока он был в Гнезде? тебе лучше не врать мне, — Жан смотрит в потемневшие глаза Эндрю, чувствуя себя напуганным до потеющих предплечий, словно разоблаченный. ✖️нет, он не боится Эндрю, не боится, что тот причинит ему боль, он боится лишь правды. боится сказать "да, касались", боится сказать "это был я", боится вспомнить, что это он испачкал Натаниэля прикосновениями. ✖️тяжелыми

custom 5248981984591497355101custom 525572989360958484531custom 52539082777202712602310💔7🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC737 views185 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как же я заорала с этого твитта, господи Эндрю, когда наконец-то решил написать рыжему недоразумению, на которого словил моментальный краш в первый же учебный день и который наглухо его не замечает (как и вообще кого-либо ещё, но это не суть!!)

128💘26😭14custom 533048947734323528711❤‍🔥3custom 52557298936095848452🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC665 views174 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ещё концептики зомби-ау, 2 часть ✋ #всерадиигры #art

98custom 525572989360958484537custom 596972282165015754426custom 525390827772027126010❤‍🔥2🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC702 views76 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как же меня убивают алгоритмы твиттера, господи, типа вришные картинки практически всегда получают хоть какой-то фидбэк, но у Гаррика буквально всего 40(!) просмотров, это как вообще 🙂

😭5417🔥5

31 Jul 2026, 20:05 UTC790 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Это было самое быстрое, что я смогла нарисовать за три часа 😇

❤‍🔥4315custom 52557298936095848453

31 Jul 2026, 20:03 UTC816 views178 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

С днём рождения, Потти ❤️ #art #гаррипоттер

121❤‍🔥34custom 596972282165015754415🔥5custom 52557298936095848452custom 52539082777202712601

30 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC≈1,050 views85 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Какую же хуйню я скорее всего нарисую 😀

71❤‍🔥6custom 53304894773432352876custom 52489819845914973552

30 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC≈1,010 views143 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Бляяя смотрю на метки, которые мне выпали в оранжевой потехе, примерно вот так 😂

custom 52557298936095848458831custom 525390827772027126015custom 53304894773432352878❤‍🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC≈1,070 views201 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Эндрилы для бусти 🦋 можно сказать, что это первая попытка Эндрю в нижней позиции 🥰 Доступно по подписке в закрытом тгк ❤️ #art #всерадиигры #эндрилы

141custom 525390827772027126027custom 524898198459149735525🔥5custom 52557298936095848452❤‍🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC≈1,140 views165 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У меня в доме появился хамелеон, кажется, но он какой-то странный и пушистый

custom 5248981984591497355112custom 596972282165015754428custom 5253908277720271260175❤‍🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @seda_artist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 57,529 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ADES✨️” (@seda_artist), 1,753 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seda_artist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.