5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,336–2,349 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 12:28
2,347
+10
11 Aug 2026, 11:44
2,337
-1
8 Aug 2026, 03:11
2,338
-5
7 Aug 2026, 14:33
2,343
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:22
2,343
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.0%
avg views ÷ 2,347 subscribers
Avg views / post
517
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (26 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
6,722
Reactions total
147
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
261 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🆒
261
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @secret_terminal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Разбираем Secret Terminal в прямом эфире
Сегодня в 18:00 разберём базовую настройку терминала, пройдёмся по основным функциям и ответим на ваши вопросы.
Если только начинаете знакомство с Secret Terminal или хотите лучше разобраться в его возможностях — присоединяйтесь.
Начинаем в 18:00.
Secret Terminal — выбирай скорость!
🔗Скачать Secret Terminal
🔗Чат в TG
🔗Тех.поддержка
🔗Экосистема Secret
🔗Подписаться на Х
Почему одной свечи недостаточно
На графике цена уже движется. Свеча растёт, объём увеличивается — кажется, что рынок всё показал.
Но свеча отображает только результат.
Она не показывает:
– где в стакане находится ликвидность;
– проходят ли реальные покупки или движение держится на отсутствии продавцов;
– появляются ли крупные заявки впереди цены;
– удерживается ли импульс или постепенно теряет силу.
Именно поэто…
Стрим Secret Terminal — в эту пятницу
В пятницу, 7 августа, в 18:00, проведём прямой эфир.
На стриме разберём настройку Secret Terminal, познакомимся с базовыми функциями терминала и ответим на вопросы участников.
Такие эфиры планируем проводить на постоянной основе, чтобы помогать пользователям лучше разбираться в возможностях терминала и применять их в работе.
Secret Terminal — выбирай скорость!
🔗Скачать Secre…
Новая обучающая неделя в Экосистеме
Продолжаем Блок 1:
Чтение графика через наторговки и консолидации
Тема недели:
1.4. Зеркальные наторговки
На этой неделе разберём:
- когда зона продавца становится поддержкой для покупателя;
- почему бывшая поддержка может превратиться в сопротивление;
- как рынок подтверждает новую роль зоны;
- как использовать зеркальную реакцию в скальпинге.
Первая часть уже опубликована:
…
Новая торговая неделя начинается не с прогноза
Перед открытием рынка полезнее не пытаться угадать движение, а подготовить рабочее пространство:
– проверить монеты с повышенным объёмом и активностью;
– отметить важные уровни и зоны ликвидности;
– убрать с графика устаревшие отметки;
– определить ситуации, в которых действительно стоит действовать;
– заранее понять, какие сценарии лучше пропустить.
Хорошая подготовк…
В Экосистеме завершили тему:
1.3. Сила импульса после наторговки
На этой неделе разобрали:
- как понять, что цена действительно выходит из диапазона;
- почему один пробой ещё ничего не подтверждает;
- чем удержание отличается от быстрого возврата;
- какую роль играют ускорение, стакан и ретест;
- как отличить настоящий импульс от шума внутри боковика;
- почему большая свеча без продолжения может стать ловушкой.
Г…
Где следить за Secret Terminal
Мы развиваем проект сразу на нескольких площадках.
▶️ YouTube
Обзоры функций, инструкции, разборы и записи стримов.
📸 Instagram и Threads
Короткие видео, новости, наблюдения о рынке и идеи команды.
𝕏 X
Короткие новости проекта, мысли о рынке, наблюдения и важные обновления.
✈️ Telegram
В основном канале — новости, обновления, статьи и анонсы.
В чате — общение и обратная связь.
В Э…
Рынок не обязан давать сделку каждый день
Одна из дорогих ошибок трейдера — воспринимать отсутствие входа как упущенную возможность.
Когда понятного сценария нет, появляется желание найти сделку любой ценой:
– увидеть импульс там, где его ещё нет;
– войти после уже прошедшего движения;
– торговать внутри шума;
– снизить требования к точке входа.
Но отсутствие сделки — тоже результат анализа.
Иногда лучшее решени…
В этом видео коротко разобрали, что такое Secret Terminal, какие задачи он помогает решать и кому подойдёт в первую очередь.
Показали, почему терминал будет полезен скальперам и активным трейдерам, которым важны скорость, стабильность и возможность видеть больше рыночных данных в одном рабочем пространстве.
▶️ Смотреть видео на YouTube
Secret Terminal — выбирай скорость!
🔗Скачать Secret Terminal
🔗Чат в TG
🔗Тех.по…
Приветствую!
Сегодня хочу сказать, что мы снова открываем двери в нашу команду тестирования версий и хотим видеть там именно наших пользователей, заинтересованных в развитии продукта. Вы сможете первыми использовать новые функции, торговать на новых биржах, а также получать за это бонусы как в USDT, так и в виде мерча от наших партнёров и нашей линейки мерча.
Для того чтобы попасть в команду, напишите на аккаунт по…
На чем сосредоточиться в ближайшее время команде разработчиков?
Добавление новых бирж48%
Добавление новых функций38%
Добавления интерфейса торговли с графика25%
Добавление индикаторов31%
The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Приветствую!
Сегодня поговорим о развитии проекта в плане разработки. Так как Secret Terminal ориентируется на мнение пользователя, я хочу спросить, что вы хотели бы видеть в плане разработки в ближайшее время. Ниже я прикреплю опрос с вариантами ответов.
Также вы можете написать свои варианты в комментариях, и мы их рассмотрим.
Для меня важно знать, чего именно хочет аудитория, поэтому прошу о максимальном вовлеч…
🆒9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @secret_terminal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
На чем сосредоточиться в ближайшее время команде разработчиков?
Добавление новых бирж48%
Добавление новых функций38%
Добавления интерфейса торговли с графика25%
Добавление индикаторов31%
The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 835,628 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Secret Terminal” (@secret_terminal), 2,347 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/secret_terminal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.