Снять маску, кто ты без нее?
custom 52264275178873334717🤣5custom 53055928575984031592

Channel
@sdytiymyach
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,016subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002069943723 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sdytiymyach |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sdytiymyach |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 1,016 | +29 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 987 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 997 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 1,001 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 1,002 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 1,003 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 1,001 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 1,002 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 1,004 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 1,004 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
296 reactions across 18 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 105 | 35.5% | |
| custom 5462881650968895018 | 28 | 9.46% | |
| custom 5305592857598403159 | 17 | 5.74% | |
| custom 5226427517887333471 | 15 | 5.07% | |
| custom 5461041038439228367 | 15 | 5.07% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 4.39% | |
| custom 5429408780397859078 | 11 | 3.72% | |
| custom 5350496332656173057 | 10 | 3.38% | |
| 🗿 | 10 | 3.38% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 3.38% | |
| 🙏 | 10 | 3.38% | |
| 🤡 | 10 | 3.38% | |
| custom 5222172313398560747 | 6 | 2.03% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 2.03% | |
| custom 5305408307148661798 | 5 | 1.69% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 1.69% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 1.35% | |
| 💅 | 3 | 1.01% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 0.676% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.676% | |
| 7 further kinds | 9 | 3.04% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 296 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sdytiymyach. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Снять маску, кто ты без нее?
custom 52264275178873334717🤣5custom 53055928575984031592
Подарок за 6,40?
❤6✍2custom 52221723133985607472👍1👎1
😢 Известные полузащитники, которые завершили карьеру и не смогли достичь уровня Якушина: Тони Кроос, Андреа Пирло, Хаби Алонсо, Хави, Зидан, Платини, Бест, Зико, Кройф, Гуллит, Бекхэм, Джеррард, Кака
🗿9🤣3custom 53055928575984031593👍2
Павел Земсков — автор лучшего спасения первого раунда Пути регионов 🧤 Вратарь «Орла» набрал 34% ваших голосов, опередив Данияла Гамзатова из «Анжи» и ростовского армейца Богдана Кузьменко 💚💛❤️ Справедливый результат?
🤣12custom 52264275178873334714custom 53055928575984031593custom 52221723133985607472👍1
Наш слоняла, Тимур Зовут Сергей Чигур так сказал
🤣15custom 53055928575984031593😨2custom 52221723133985607472
Орёл 🦅 в массы! https://youtu.be/TGn19PFMVvg?si=Cw-_-lBFtjDMS6C5
custom 54294087803978590788❤2🔥2custom 52264275178873334712🎉1👏1🗿1custom 53055928575984031591
Розыгрыш автографов нужен?
🙏10custom 53054083071486617985custom 53055928575984031595💩2
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤣8🤡2
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣10🤝2😁2
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤡8💅3💩2💊1
🔥 Мия Халифа сняла "проклятие Дрейка" в матче группы 3 Пока Дрейк в очередной раз подтвердил свою репутацию главного неудачника со ставками, Мия Халифа забрала $4,5 млн на победе «Сатурна» над «Орлом» Кстати, это уже вторая подряд победная ставка Мии на Сатурн. После матча с Квантом ее заметили с новой бриллиантовой цепью — поговаривают, это подарок после вступления в закрытый клуб для VIP-игроков.
🤣10❤1custom 52264275178873334711
Господа, познакомьтесь, рядовой Дезмонд Досс. Оказалось, что рядовой Досс не верит в насилие и отвергает его. Он отказался даже дотронуться до винтовки.Наш рядовой Досс - религиозный фанатик и пацифист.Так что я вас умоляю, не ждите от него помощи на поле боя. Поскольку, как выяснилось, он заботится только о своей совести, а не о вас.
🤣11custom 52264275178873334711
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @sdytiymyach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сдутый мяч | ФК Орёл” (@sdytiymyach), 1,016 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sdytiymyach.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.