Channel
@scro71
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
292subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002102303407 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scro71 |
| Description | قناة أرشيفية ذات طابع اخباري انتقائي يُعلق عليه احيانا ... ملاحظة مهمة: (القناة قد تكون غير مناسبة لمن هم دون الـ ١٧ عامًا). @scro7 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scro71 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 292 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 292 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (6 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 689 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
22 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 40.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 27.3% | |
| 😡 | 5 | 22.7% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
حسنا ... حركة عسكرية ذكية لكن هلا ذكرت لنا الاضرار التي نتجت عن هذه الحركة الذكية كما ذكرت منافعها ؟ فالتيار الكهربائي الكافي لقتل الانسان كافي لنفوق مئات الالاف من الاسماك والمخلوقات الحية الاخرى . "هذا ما اقصده بعدم التعامل المنهجي مع الاحداث التاريخية وتصويرها على انها انتصار او خسارة او مجد مع أن الحرب كانت عبثية بإعتراف الطرفين بغض النظر عن المسبب".
❤1
Signed زيد بن إسحاق
التعامل مع الاحداث التاريخية بطريقة غير منهجية ينتج لك مجتمع جاهل خاوي من الفكر، يجعل من التاريخ ساحة نزاع وصراع ايدلوجي لا ساحة نتعلم منها الاخطاء .
❤1
Signed زيد بن إسحاق
ما الغاية من نشر صورة صدام ممزقة وصورة السيد روح الله الخميني مرفوعة؟ ما الغاية من نشر صورة جندي يضع حذائه على رسمة للسيد الخميني رافعا صورة صدام حسين ؟ حادثة تأريخية حاولوا أن تثقفوا الناس وتعلموهم اضرارها.. اسبابها ... احداثها ... نتائجها، من هو العدو الحقيقي في الحرب وماذا نتعلم منها بدلا من العبثية الجارية
❤🔥2
Signed زيد بن إسحاق
لازم اغسل عيوني بديتول بعد ما شفت النقاشات والكتابات الدائرة حول الحرب العراقية الإيرانية . كم إن الأمر فوضوي وعبثي حقا .
❤🔥4
Signed زيد بن إسحاق
Iranian Women Train for Combat Iranian women receiving intensive training in the handling of arms in a camp near Tehran. All of them are volunteers who are enlisted in the Basidj group which recruits other women from Iranian provinces. - - - - - - - - نساء إيرانيات يتدرّبن للقتال نساء إيرانيات يتلقَّين تدريبًا مكثفًا على استعمال الأسلحة في معسكر قرب طهران. جميعهن متطوعات ومنخرطات في حركة «البسيج» التي تجند نساءً من م…
❤2
Signed ياس
War between Iran and Iraq Iranian oil refinery on fire during the war between Iran and Iraq, 27th September 1980 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- مصفاةُ نفطٍ إيرانيةٌ تشتعل فيها النيران إبّان الحرب بين إيران والعراق، في السابع والعشرين من أيلول/سبتمبر . 1980 Iran
Signed ياس
Body of Iranian Soldier in Iraq The body of an Iranian soldier following combat that took place in Al Beida in Iraq in 1984. The war between Iran and Iraq broke out in 1980 and lasted until 1988 following disputes over border disagreements. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- جثمانُ جنديٍّ إيرانيّ بعد اشتباكاتٍ وقعت في منطقة البيضاء بالعراق عام 1984. وقد اندلعت الحرب بين إيران والعراق عام 1980 واستم…
Signed ياس
https://t.me/MUJTABAQRY قناة تكتب وتعلق على الاحداث التي تتعلق بالمقاومة - وصاحب القناة صديق لي - لهذا انضموا لها لأني اجد فيها منفعة لكم .
❤2
Signed ياس
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم القناة مخصصة للكتابات الآتية؛ العلوم الدينية العسكرية الاقتصادية السياسية . قد يرد لدى أذهان البعض أنهم اعتادوا على القنوات المتخصصة في الشؤون المذكورة إبعاد الدين وكل ذا صلةٍ به عن محاور المقالات، وهذا بحد ذاته خرط القتاد فيجبُ على المقاوم أن يعلم أن منطلق كل مجال إن لم يكن شرعياً فهو باطل، وهذا ما يجب عليَّ شخصياً أن أوضحه بتبيان الحق في المجالات المذكورة وارتباطها الوثيق بالدين ورجاله وال…
❤1
Signed ياس
Video, posted without a caption
Signed ياس
Photo, posted without a caption
😡5😁1
Signed ياس
-
❤1
Signed زيد بن إسحاق
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @scro71. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 506,697 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“لا أحد - من وإلى التاريخ” (@scro71), 292 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scro71.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.