Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Scopus | Elsevier WOS

Channel

Scopus | Elsevier WOS

@scopusservices

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,345subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001322226196
TypeChannel
Username@scopusservices
Created12 December 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/scopusservices

Growth

3,3423,3453,343.56 August 2026 — 3,344 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,344 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,342 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,345 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 11 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,342–3,345 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 11:083,345+3
13 Aug 2026, 11:153,342-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:463,344no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:073,344first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 4 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.5%
avg views ÷ 3,345 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,420
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held15 (4 November 20254 August 2026)
Views total5,688
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 51s
Average length
7m 51s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC528 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ostonovminbariPhoto

Mavzuga doir amaliy nimadir ham olib keldim. Masalan, Fransiya Ilmiy tadqiqotlar Milliy markazi (CNRS) 2024-yilda Scopus, 2026-yil 1-yanvardan esa Web of Sciences ba'zalaridan chiqib ketdi. Sabablari havolalardagi xabarda keltirilgan. Bunaqa sun'iy tizimlar olimni yoki tadqiqotni baholashga mezon bo'lmasligi kerak. Uni olimlar jamoasi hal qilishi kerak. Qandaydir kommersial tashkilotlar emas. @ostonovminbari

23 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC≈2,050 viewsread 7 August 2026

Q3 jurnal tibbiyot scopus 4 oyda chiqadi Poly(butyl cyanoacrylate) Nanoparticles for Cancer Drug Delivery and Targeting: Preparation Routes, Surface Engineering, and Translational Design Considerations Position 1-14 Plant Polysaccharides in Cancer Therapy: An Evidence-Aware, Structure-Guided, and Translation-Oriented Review Position 1-14 Мурожаат учун @scopusservice

19 Jul 2026, 14:06 UTC≈1,580 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сен илмда ёлғиз эмассан!!! Скопус журналларига чегирма эълон қилинади. Мақола талаблари Deadline 25.07.2026 нархи 950.000 сўм. Мурожаат учун @scopusservice Каналчамизга кўшилинг @scopusservices

19 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 7 August 2026

Хаммуалиф керак 3 дона Q3 jurnal Mavzu: Тимохинон, загруженный в экзосомы, полученные из коровьего молока, усиливает противоопухолевую активность в клетках рака легких A549 Мурожаат учун @scopusservice

8 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC≈3,120 viewsread 7 August 2026

Хаммуалиф керак 3 дона Q3 jurnal Mavzu: Oral Cancer Risk in Patients with Oral Lichen Planus: A Narrative Review Мурожаат учун @scopusservice

2 May 2026, 21:36 UTC≈3,520 viewsread 7 August 2026

Бизнинг тренингларда қатнашиб, ўзлари мустаққил мақола ёзишни ўрганиб, мақола элон қилган ҳурматли муаллифларни табриклаймиз! https://waocp.com/journal/index.php/apjcc/article/view/2347 Сиз ҳам бизнинг скопусга иккинчи қадам дарсларимизда қатнашинг @scopusservice

21 Mar 2026, 16:34 UTC≈17,400 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📢 PhD va DSc himoya talablari yangilanmoqda! Ilmiy daraja olish tizimida muhim o‘zgarishlar joriy etilmoqda. Endilikda Q1 va Q2 darajadagi jurnallarda maqola chop etish talablari bosqichma-bosqich kuchaytiriladi. 🎓 DSc (Fan doktori) 📅 2026-yil sentyabrdan boshlab: ✅ Kamida 2 ta maqola — Q1 yoki Q2 jurnallarda 🎓 PhD (Falsafa doktori) 📅 2027-yildan boshlab: ✅ Kamida 1 ta maqola — Q1 yoki Q2 jurnallarda 📌 Dissertats

26 Feb 2026, 08:40 UTC≈3,810 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @conferences2026

Бепул конференция да катнашинг хозир тўғридан тўғри https://meet.google.com/dqk-ymke-ajy

21 Jan 2026, 12:30 UTC≈4,570 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Rasmiy_axborot_officialVideo

✏️2025 yilda Fanlar akademiyasi tomonidan amalga oshirilgan ishlar, ilmiy-tadqiqot natijalari 2025 yil davomida jami 182 ta, jumladan 145 ta PhD va 37 ta DSc dissertatsiyalari muvofaqqiyatli himoya qilindi. Ilmiy jurnallarda 1552 ta, shundan 620 ta SCOPUS/WoSda maqolalar, 156 ta monografiyalar, darsliklar va o‘quv qo‘lanmallar nashr etildi, 37 ta patent olindi, shundan 8 tasi amaliyotga joriy etildi. 4 mln 929 ming

10 Jan 2026, 11:09 UTC≈4,320 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @jalilovqaydlarPhoto

Ilmiy ishonchsizlik bo'yicha O'zbekiston dunyoda top-10talikda 2025-yilda O'zbekiston ilmiy maqolalari ishonchsiz deb topilib, ilmiy bazalardan chiqarilgan ("qaytarib olingan") davlatlar orasida top 10talikka kirgan. (Retraction - ilmiy manbalarda chop etilgan maqolaning "qaytarib olinishi", ishonchsiz, ilm talablariga mos kelmaydi, deb e'tirof etilishi). Hindistonlik tadqiqotchi Achal Agrawal PostPub Retraction Das

5 Jan 2026, 13:58 UTC≈1,740 viewsread 7 August 2026

2026 mart scopus 2-muallif buling 250$ 4-muallif buling 220$ Мавзу: Exercise and Regulation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR and AMPK Pathways in Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications Murojaat uchun @scopusservice Journal name: Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care (APJCC) Journal link: http://waocp.com/journal/index.php/apjcc Scopus linkQ3 : https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/21101272732 SJRQ4 : https://www

31 Dec 2025, 14:33 UTC≈4,350 viewsread 7 August 2026

2026 mart scopus 2-muallif buling 250$ 4-muallif buling 220$ Мавзу: Exercise and Regulation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR and AMPK Pathways in Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications Murojaat uchun @scopusservice Journal name: Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care (APJCC) Journal link: http://waocp.com/journal/index.php/apjcc Scopus linkQ3 : https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/21101272732 SJRQ4 : https://www

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @scopusservices. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 325,552 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Scopus | Elsevier WOS” (@scopusservices), 3,345 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scopusservices.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.