Channel
@scofield_crypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,300subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001344585232 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scofield_crypto |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scofield_crypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 3,300 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 3,301 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 3,303 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 3,303 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
$IMO is setting up for a massive move - most aren't ready for it. The @swissborg listing is just the beginning. Once @IMO__Invest expands from 7 to 10+ revenue-generating properties this year, the profits alone could send the chart flying. This RWA play is soo back 🔙🔙 https://x.com/swissborg/status/1986820713718882607?s=46&t=QZBB4h0lH_uKxzQlmrlY8g
$100 giveaway Like this tweet👇 https://x.com/crypto_scofield/status/1906942662445502500?s=46&t=74syr2jjzlMzbKsFulkz2w I will contact the winner on twitter
🔥 Hot take: $CLAIRY could send hard! @ClairvoyAI isn't just a tool - it's a research beast - BUILT FOR CRYPTO. Custom workflows, live data, and answers that don't suck. Alpha: Their roadmap includes adding real-time blockchain data usage capabilities. Go play with it 👇 https://www.clairvoyai.com/ https://dexscreener.com/solana/bnnrh61catxpadzxas7hepaefp3i5seyuw4fwrsbqvse
$1.07 > $2.97 on $ZKJ This token has been maintaining a strong uptrend so far. @PolyhedraZK = Solution to achieve Widespread adoption of AI Systems
👀 @OneAnalog Interoperability tech so solid that Binance and other big names are in for $ANLOG For example, their tools let devs build dApps where users can interact with any asset/app on ANY blockchain. Looks like a solid play to me. https://x.com/OneAnalog/status/1877672285307613431
With $COAI: ✅ Launch AI agents instantly ✅ Train & trade agents via Telegram bots ✅ Co-own agents to earn $$ from their success All on the #COTI network. Plus, @COTIagents is backed by @COTInetwork 🔥 https://x.com/COTIagents/status/1875183536636096729?t=8869FzshTCPTkoqlKTxVQw&s=19
After gaining in $SUI, I need a new low-cap L1 - $ZKJ is just that. Three Rising Valleys on the charts show a potential leg up that will send till $3 🚀 @PolyhedraZK is a goddamn good project and its L1 is for AI apps to operate while not doing what they shouldn't.
I've seen my fair share of RUNES improvements, but this just tops them Their approach to Runes trading is refreshingly practical and open the BTC Eco to massive liquidity on EVMs. @BefiLabs is the Uni of Bitcoin. Check it - https://befilabs.com/
$AEG is showing strength and looks ready for a good move. Available on #KuCoin, it's from the Top G studio @AetherGamesInc , who built the official Wheel of Time card game, live on major game stores now.
Seems like #LAY3R is going to speedrun to $10M soon!! Incredible delivery from @AutoLayer team so far. And now this LIP with 1600%+ APR!!
😈 @Poolz__ delivered a 30x on an earlier AI Agent launch, and this looks even better. Stake at least 250 $POOLX to reserve a allocation on @COTIagents 🔥 Launch set at an IMC of $445K 👉 https://www.poolz.finance/project-details/about/274
Just tested some transactions on the EXPchain testnet - smooth AF! 🚀 No hiccups so far, but can't wait for dApps to go live. This is a big moment for $ZKJ and @PolyhedraZK https://x.com/PolyhedraZK/status/1867208082599583830
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @scofield_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,041,579 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@scofield_crypto named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Scofield trading group” (@scofield_crypto), 3,300 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scofield_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.