Channel name was changed to «Цитатник SciTopus - Научпоп мемы и цитаты ученых»

Channel
Цитатник SciTopus - Научпоп мемы и цитаты ученых
@scitopusquotes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
894subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001451482279 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scitopusquotes |
| Created | 10 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scitopusquotes |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 894 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 895 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 895 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 March 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
190 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 53 | 27.9% | |
| 😁 | 45 | 23.7% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 15.8% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 10.0% | |
| 🤣 | 18 | 9.47% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 3.16% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 2.63% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 1.58% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 1.05% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.526% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.526% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.526% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.526% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.526% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.526% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.526% | |
| 🤷 | 1 | 0.526% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.526% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2021 to 11 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Posted without readable text
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣11🔥5😁2👍1
Сайтопус в вашей ленте каждый раз, когда сели смотреть НЕнаучпоп
👍4🔥2😭2❤1
600 научпоп-каналов! Спустя 6 лет выходит новая версия списка научпоп-каналов @SciTopus. Публикуем обновлённый список научно-популярных YouTube-каналов: почти 600, вдвое больше, чем в прошлый раз. Теперь список будет на нашем сайте. Там же вас ждёт и интерактивная статистика (дашборд) от наших друзей. В общей сложности над перезапуском работали 30 человек, а в очереди на анализ было свыше 1,5 тыс. каналов. Почти ве…
❤7👍4🔥4
Photo, posted without a caption
😁7🔥2🤨1🤯1
Channel photo updated
Photo, posted without a caption
😁18🤣7🤔1🤷1😐1
Хотите одним кликом подписаться на всех научно-популярных блогеров из SciTopus? Теперь в Telegram есть такая возможность! Мы подготовили папку, которая добавится в ваш Telegram. Зайдя в неё, вы сможете следить за публикациями всех популяризаторов науки, являющихся нашими партнёрами, у которых есть Telegram-каналы: https://t.me/addlist/J9zysqZsgN0wNGYy Кроме того, не забудьте про список научно-популярных Телеграм-ка…
🔥5👍4❤1❤🔥1💩1🥴1😢1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁14❤9👀3👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍15🔥7❤1🤡1😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍15
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @scitopusquotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Цитатник SciTopus - Научпоп мемы и цитаты ученых” (@scitopusquotes), 894 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scitopusquotes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.