Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for معلومات مهمة عن الفلسفة والدين والعلم الطبيعي

Channel

معلومات مهمة عن الفلسفة والدين والعلم الطبيعي

@scientificquotes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,105subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 30 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001595452888
TypeChannel
Username@scientificquotes
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 September 2026
Last confirmed live30 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/scientificquotes

Growth

1,10530 Sept 2026, 12:47 — 1,105 subscribers30 Sept 2026, 13:22 — 1,105 subscribers30 Sept 2026, 12:4730 Sept 2026, 13:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,104–1,106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Sept 2026, 13:221,105no change
30 Sept 2026, 12:471,105first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,540
Videos
≈13
Links
≈298

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤981.8%
🔥19.09%
😁19.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jul 2026, 21:04 UTC381 views0 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

2 Jul 2026, 21:04 UTC378 viewsread 30 September 2026

كلام عن ما يسمى بالمعارف القبلية ووالبعدية ومسالة الفطرة

23 Jun 2026, 08:44 UTC443 views6 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @Eqnaa3

الحمد لله وحده، أما بعد، فكثيرا ما يأتيني من يسأل عن كتب في فلسفة العلم أو كيف أبدأ في قراءة الفلسفة أو ما شاكل ذلك. وجوابي لهؤلاء جميعا واحد: يا إخوة أنا لست فيلسوفا ولا أستاذ فلسفة، أنا إنما أقرأ في تلك الحمأة حتى لا تضطروا أنتم للغرق فيها، بارك الله فيكم! لست أعقد السلاسل العلمية والدروس في هذه الأبواب التي تتعلق بالتجريبيات والطبيعيات والإنسانيات والتي تتناول النظريات الفلسفية بالنقد والغربلة من أجل أن أخرج طالبا…

❤4🔥1😁1

2 Jun 2026, 21:19 UTC467 views2 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @thamar4

- قَالَ شَيْخُ الْإِسْلَامِ ابْنُ تَيْمِيَّةَ رَحِمَـهُ اللَّه: قُلوبُ المُسلمِينَ الصَّادِقة، وأدعِيَتُهم الصَّالِحَة، هِي العَسكَرُ الذِّي لا يُغلَبْ، والجُندُ الَّذِي لا يُخذَل. مَجمُوع الفَتاوى (٦٤٤/٢٨) 📚┅━℘⇣💫📗💫⇣℘━┅📚

❤2

2 Jun 2026, 21:17 UTC433 viewsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @thamar4

- وَقَدْ حَكَمَ اللَّهُ حُكْمًا لَا يُبَدَّلُ أَبَدًا أَنَّ الْعَاقِبَةَ لِلتَّقْوَى، وَالْعَاقِبَةَ لِلْمُتَّقِينَ. ـ ابْنُ الْقَيِّمِ، الدَّاءِ وَالدَّوَاءِ | ٣٦١. 📚┅━℘⇣💫📗💫⇣℘━┅📚

2 Jun 2026, 21:10 UTC386 views2 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @Eqnaa3

الحمد لله وحده، أما بعد، فكثير من المسلمين يتأذون مما نقول في نظرية التطور، ويعترضون بقولهم: لماذا تصرون على "خلط الدين" بعلم الأحياء؟؟ هذه نظرية علمية، فاتركوها لأهل الشأن وقفوا عند حدود التجويز من جهة العقل والشرع، وأريحونا وأريحوا أنفسكم! فنحن نقول جوابا عن ذلك: لابد أن يفهم كل مسلم له صلة بعلوم الأحياء في عصرنا هذا أن قضية أصل الأنواع الحية قضية غيبية صرفة من مبدأ الطرح، لا مدخل للعلم التجريبي إليها من ابتداء الأ…

❤2

28 May 2026, 20:43 UTC317 views1 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @lnmcil1

قال ابن تيمية - رحمه الله -: «وليس من شرط المُتَّقين ونحوهم أن لا يقع منهم ذنْب، ولا أن يكونوا معصومين من الخطأ والذنوب فإنّ هذا لو كان كذلك لم يكن في الأُمة مُتَّقٍ؛ بل من تاب من ذنوبه دَخل في المُتّقين». منهاج السنة (٧ / ٨٢)

❤1

26 May 2026, 14:50 UTC319 viewsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @tr728

هل لابن تيمية كتاب عقدي شامل في بيان مقالاته وحججه في الاعتقاد ؟ ينفي بعض الناس ذلك وهذا عجيب فشرح الأصفهانية نموذج للكتاب العقدي الشامل والشمول لا يعني عدم فوات بعض المسائل فعامة الكتب التي توصف بالشمول ستجد فيها بعض الفوات وإنما الضابط شمول الأبواب وأكثر مهمات المسائل والأصفهانية يصدق عليه هذا الضابط مع اجتماع هذا الشمول بعمق البحث لا مجرد ذكر أصل المسألة.

26 May 2026, 13:36 UTC286 viewsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @alshehrichannel

من أعظم أسباب التشتت في عصرنا وأشدها فتكًا = غياب الهدف الهادي، أو تغييب النفس عنه، إما ذاتيًا أو بفعل الغير، وحلول الوسائل محله، أي الغرق في الوسائل لدرجة العمى عن الأهداف إن وجدت، فإن لم توجد أصلاً فهذا قعر سحيق لن يخرج الإنسان منه إلا برحمة إلهية يجلبها صدق المرء في مراجعة حياته مراجعة شاملة أمينة للغاية من وجوده .. والغرق في الوسائل اليوم شطر كبير منه إلا لم نقل أغلبه = متعمّد، لأنه وسيلة للتلهّي المستمر عن م…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @scientificquotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

لِـ طلبة العلم 📚.
@Mohamedyoussef2 · 19,741
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“معلومات مهمة عن الفلسفة والدين والعلم الطبيعي” (@scientificquotes), 1,105 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scientificquotes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.