7 measurements spanning 17 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,038–7,096 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 01:56
7,089
+7
20 Aug 2026, 07:16
7,082
+10
17 Aug 2026, 12:53
7,072
+14
14 Aug 2026, 05:46
7,058
+10
10 Aug 2026, 20:54
7,048
+3
7 Aug 2026, 02:00
7,045
no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:56
7,045
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 7,089 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,070
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held
19 (9 June 2026 – 2 August 2026)
Views total
4,288
Reactions total
78
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
52m 41s
Average length
26m 21s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
320 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
139
43.4%
❤🔥
47
14.7%
🏆
30
9.38%
🔥
23
7.19%
💯
22
6.88%
👌
17
5.31%
😁
16
5.00%
😍
10
3.13%
👏
5
1.56%
⚡
4
1.25%
💊
3
0.938%
🤔
2
0.625%
🍾
1
0.313%
🙏
1
0.313%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 320reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @scienti_f. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 June 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔳 راهبردهای واضحسازی
فهم واقعی زمانی آشکار میشود که بتوانیم ایدهای را به شکلی روشن و دقیق بیان کنیم. برای سنجش میزان درک خود، این چهار راهبرد را به کار بگیرید
۱. بیان روشن تز در یک جمله اگر نتوانیم ایدهی اصلی خود را با واژههای خودمان و در قالب یک جملهی دقیق بیان کنیم، هنوز بهدرستی نمیدانیم چه میخواهیم بگوییم.
۲. توضیح ایده با جزئیات بیشتر اگر نتوانیم حرف اصلی خود را بسط دهیم و آن را به دانستهها و مفاهیم پی…
📚 چیزی که خودم از این کتاب دوست داشتم؛ اینه که بیشتر از اینکه دربارهی نوشتن حرف بزنه، یاد میده چطور فکر کنیم. خیلی وقتها مشکلمون نوشتن نیست، شلخته فکر کردنه.
اگه دانشجو، پژوهشگر یا کلا اهل نوشتن هستید، فکر میکنم این کتاب ارزش خوندن داره. من که ازش نکتههای خوبی دارم میگیرم 📚✍
🟢دو روز پیش یه لایو وایرال شد. احتمالا خیلیهامون چند ثانیه اولش رو با این فکر دیدیم که الان یکی میاد جلوشو میگیره، یا لایو قطع میشه. ولی نشد.
مرد داشت یه زن رو تحقیر میکرد، کتکش می زد و وسط همه این صحنهها، هر از گاهی هم سرش رو میاورد سمت گوشی، کامنتها رو میخوند، جواب میداد و دوباره برمیگشت.
نمیدونم چرا، ولی از همون موقع ذهنم گیر همین تصویر مونده.
اون لحظهای که انگار لایو، خودش بخشی از خشونت شده بود.
دیشب هم خ…
✨ مثلث ارسطو در رواندرمانی
آیا درمان مؤثر فقط به دانش درمانگر وابسته است؟ یا کیفیت رابطه و اعتماد نیز به همان اندازه اهمیت دارد؟
در این اینفوگرافیک، مثلث ارسطو را به زبان رواندرمانی بازخوانی کردهام:
🔹اتوس Ethos: ایجاد اعتماد، اعتبار حرفهای و فضایی امن میان درمانگر و مراجع.
❤️ پاتوس Pathos: همدلی، همراهی با احساسات مراجع و ساختن یک رابطه درمانی عمیق و اصیل.
🧠 لوگوس Logos: تحلیل عقلانی، مفهومسازی بالینی و طر…
👃بنظرتون چرا بینی انسانها اینقدر با هم فرق داره؟
معمولا اولین چیزی که به ذهنمون میرسه، ژنتیکه. جواب اشتباهی هم نیست. اما یه سوال مهمتر باقی میمونه ژنتیک توضیح میده این ویژگی چطور از نسلی به نسل بعد منتقل شده، اما همیشه توضیح نمیده چرا بعضی ویژگیها اصلا به وجود اومدن یا چرا در بعضی جمعیتها بیشتر دیده میشن.
همین سوال، سالهاست ذهن انسانشناسهای زیستی و زیستشناس های تکاملی رو هم درگیر کرده.
قبل از اینکه بینی ع…
🟣 فکر کنم وقتشه با Nova آشنا بشید.
چند ماهی بود یه ایده توی ذهنم میچرخید؛ اینکه کاش کنار متنها و مقاله های این کانال، یه شخصیت هم حضور داشته باشه.
برای اینکه سوال بپرسه، ایدهها رو دنبال کنه و گاهی کمک کنه مفاهیم پیچیده، سادهتر روایت بشن.
نتیجهی اون ایده شد Nova.
از این به بعد، هر جا Nova رو دیدید، احتمالا قراره با هم یه مقاله رو مرور کنیم، یه مفهوم رو باز کنیم یا از یه زاویهی متفاوت به یه سوال فکر کنیم.
امیدوار…
📊یکی از محدودیتهای جالب ذهن انسان اینه که هر جا قدرت تصورش تموم میشه، شهودش هم کم کم دقت خودش رو از دست میده. ما معمولا فکر میکنیم اگر چیزی رو نتونیم در ذهنمون مجسم کنیم، پس احتمال وقوعش هم خیلی کمه یا اصلا اهمیتی نداره. در حالی که واقعیت لزوما اینطور نیست. ذهن انسان برای درک فضاهای احتمالاتی عظیم یا اعداد بسیار بزرگ تکامل پیدا نکرده؛ ذهن ما برای تصمیمگیری در موقعیتهای روزمره ساخته شده، نه برای فهم اعدادی که از …
دیگه فهمیدم مد چجوری کار میکنه؛اگه ما بپوشیم داداش این چه تیپیه
اگه دیور همونو معرفی کنه وااای چه استایل خاص و مینیمالی 🤩
خلاصه هرچی مال خودمونه، یه لوگوی خارجی که بخوره، ارزشش صد برابر میشه
بعد هنوز میگن اینا از ما ایده نمیگیرن... از نقش قالیمون گرفته تا لباسمون 😗😎
انگار کل دپارتمان طراحیشون رو فرستادن ایران کارآموزی 😅
🟠نمیدانم فقط من این حس را دارم یا نه ولی بعد از هر برد، بیشتر از خود نتیجه، منتظر تیترها میشوم. انگار مسابقه که تمام میشود، تازه نوبت ماست. نوبت اینکه از یک اتفاق، چیزی بزرگتر از خودش بسازیم. کافی است بعد از مدتها یک بازی را ببریم ناگهان همهچیز تاریخی میشود، حماسی میشود، بعضی وقتها فکر میکنم ما خیلی زود به واژههای بزرگ میرسیم خیلی زودتر از اینکه به دستاوردهای بزرگ برسیم.
امروز ژاپن دهمین برد متوالیاش را…
امروز تولد مرداده. اگه پروفایلم رو دیده باشید یا یکبار باهام همکلام شده باشید، مرداد رو میشناسید؛ شیرینترین همراه که امروز چهارساله شد. شاید فقط ۲.۳۰۰ گرم و ۶۴ سانتیمتر باشه، اما ردپایی که از خودش بجا میذاره، اصلا با این عددها همخوان نیست.
اسم مجموعه، «آموردات»، از همون کلمهای الهام گرفت که به مرداد دادم؛ کلمه «مرداد» در فارسی امروز، شکل تحولیافته «آمرداد» هست؛ و آمرداد از «اَمِرِتاته» در زبان اوستایی میاد؛…
❤🔥8🍾1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @scienti_f. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🌿Green book🌿 @greenbook_channel · 55,359 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“علوم اعصاب و روانشناسی | NeuroVerse” (@scienti_f), 7,089 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scienti_f.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
