Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ✧science stream students˚₊‧₊

Channel

✧science stream students˚₊‧₊

@sciencestreamm

Not marked by Telegram, checked 4 October 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,497subscribers

+61 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002168974773
TypeChannel
Username@sciencestreamm
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 September 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sciencestreamm

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

3,4363,4973,466.51 September 2026 — 3,436 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,447 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,467 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,483 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,486 subscribers26 September 2026 — 3,447 subscribers4 October 2026 — 3,449 subscribers11 October 2026 — 3,459 subscribers14 October 2026 — 3,458 subscribers17 October 2026 — 3,459 subscribers20 October 2026 — 3,455 subscribers24 October 2026 — 3,465 subscribers27 October 2026 — 3,479 subscribers30 October 2026 — 3,486 subscribers3 November 2026 — 3,497 subscribers1 September 20263 November 2026
15 measurements spanning 63 days, net +61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,427–3,506 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 00:153,497+11
30 Oct 2026, 14:103,486+7
27 Oct 2026, 04:273,479+14
24 Oct 2026, 02:463,465+10
20 Oct 2026, 22:313,455-4
17 Oct 2026, 12:063,459+1
14 Oct 2026, 21:403,458-1
11 Oct 2026, 18:383,459+10
4 Oct 2026, 23:393,449+2
26 Sept 2026, 04:403,447-39
15 Sept 2026, 03:413,486+3
11 Sept 2026, 15:163,483+16
7 Sept 2026, 03:373,467+20
2 Sept 2026, 03:043,447+11
1 Sept 2026, 06:303,436first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3984.8%
😭510.9%
😨24.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 04:20 UTC142 viewsread 1 September 2026
Poll

👀

  1. yess25%
  2. yes plzzz58%
  3. possibly15%
  4. no.. I don't want🙄2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 04:19 UTC147 viewsread 1 September 2026

If I buat a Bio/Fizik/Chem objective questions discussion class anytime soon, ada yang nak join tak? 👀👉🏻👈🏻📚.. kita tengok majority voting!!

23 Jul 2026, 03:05 UTC≈1,560 views23 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Hello everyone Please stop sharing fake TNG eWallet QR codes claiming to give pocket money. Also, to everyone here, please don't scan random QR codes without checking carefully first. Always verify that they're from a trusted source before scanning - Group Owner N

❤23

19 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC≈1,810 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @rihalols

ini dari ustaz saya share harap bermanfaat ye

❤2

Signed kyraa୨୧

19 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @rihalolsPhoto

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSX9WSwr9/

Signed kyraa୨୧

19 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC≈1,470 views9 reactionsread 1 September 2026

goodluck yee utqh spm esok buat yg tebaikk bykkan berdoa insyaallah Allah lancarkan segala urusan waktu ujian✨

❤9

Signed kyraa୨୧

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @sciencestreamm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Sept 2026, 04:20 UTCAnonymous Poll60 voters

👀

  1. yess25%
  2. yes plzzz58%
  3. possibly15%
  4. no.. I don't want🙄2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Bahan Fizik SPM 📚
@bahanfizikspm · 35,053
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026
Mathematics Spmnetic!™ 🔢
@mathematicspmnotes · 39,484
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✧science stream students˚₊‧₊” (@sciencestreamm), 3,497 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sciencestreamm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.