Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ✧science stream students˚₊‧₊

Channel

✧science stream students˚₊‧₊

@sciencestreamm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,486subscribers

+50 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002168974773
TypeChannel
Username@sciencestreamm
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 September 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sciencestreamm

Growth

3,4363,4863,4611 September 2026 — 3,436 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,447 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,467 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,483 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,486 subscribers1 September 202615 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 14 days, net +50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,429–3,494 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 03:413,486+3
11 Sept 2026, 15:163,483+16
7 Sept 2026, 03:373,467+20
2 Sept 2026, 03:043,447+11
1 Sept 2026, 06:303,436first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.29%
avg views ÷ 3,486 subscribers
Avg views / post
150
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held11 (8 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total748
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 06:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3984.8%
😭510.9%
😨24.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 04:20 UTC142 viewsread 1 September 2026
Poll

👀

  1. yess25%
  2. yes plzzz58%
  3. possibly15%
  4. no.. I don't want🙄2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 04:19 UTC147 viewsread 1 September 2026

If I buat a Bio/Fizik/Chem objective questions discussion class anytime soon, ada yang nak join tak? 👀👉🏻👈🏻📚.. kita tengok majority voting!!

23 Jul 2026, 03:05 UTC≈1,560 views23 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Hello everyone Please stop sharing fake TNG eWallet QR codes claiming to give pocket money. Also, to everyone here, please don't scan random QR codes without checking carefully first. Always verify that they're from a trusted source before scanning - Group Owner N

23

19 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC≈1,810 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @rihalols

ini dari ustaz saya share harap bermanfaat ye

2

Signed kyraa୨୧

19 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @rihalolsPhoto

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSX9WSwr9/

Signed kyraa୨୧

19 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC≈1,470 views9 reactionsread 1 September 2026

goodluck yee utqh spm esok buat yg tebaikk bykkan berdoa insyaallah Allah lancarkan segala urusan waktu ujian✨

9

Signed kyraa୨୧

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @sciencestreamm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Sept 2026, 04:20 UTCAnonymous Poll60 voters

👀

  1. yess25%
  2. yes plzzz58%
  3. possibly15%
  4. no.. I don't want🙄2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Bahan Fizik SPM 📚
@bahanfizikspm · 32,420
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026
Mathematics Spmnetic!™ 🔢
@mathematicspmnotes · 37,721
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✧science stream students˚₊‧₊” (@sciencestreamm), 3,486 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sciencestreamm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.