Channel
@scandalistasquad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
35subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004486290447 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scandalistasquad |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scandalistasquad |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 35 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 33 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 33 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,063 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 40.0% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
—☺️удильник звенит, а значит можно отложить все важные дела (которых и так нет) и изучить последние новости комьюнити! 🌟🌟 🌟🌟 ☺️дминистрация: 💙 Serenity Flood объявили новый админ состав. Вот кто всех админов себе прибрал! 💙 Salvatore в поиске монтажёра, каков шанс, что он уволится на следующий день, как объявится? 💙 Kagero Days открыли набор в адм…
🐈⬛🐈⬛🐈⬛🐈⬛🤩🤩🗝🗝🗝🤩🤩 🐈⬛🐈⬛🐈⬛🐈⬛🤩🤩🗝🗝🗝🤩🤩 🪄 🍷ротестую! Небольшая мини-зарисовка о буднях нашей администрации в жанре Ace Attorney. #мем@scandalistasquad
🍓1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🪄 Турниры, интриги... Очередной разбор. С головой окунёмся недавний скандал, который произошёл между организатором и капитаном команды. Узнаем, кто прав, а кто — не очень. Вдруг есть ещё подводные камни?
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌑🥂🐬🐬🐬🐬🐬🐬🐬🐬🐬🔤🔤pt. 2 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑с Бейном ⚔ 🦷 🤩🤩 Сегодняшний гость: 🤩🤩 🐈⬛🐈⬛🐈⬛ Кисс 💫 ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ ⚔: Насчёт Домика, Ремы и Киры — да, я уверен, эти славные моряки обрадуются твоим словам. Но позволь мне, старому волку, внести поправку в лоцию: по поводу Киры я с тобой не соглашусь. На моей памяти, когда поднимался шторм и летели искры, Кира почти всегда оставалась на баке с биноклем, …
❤1🔥1🥰1
🌑🥂🐬🐬🐬🐬🐬🐬🐬🐬🐬🔤🔤pt. 1 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑с Бейном ⚔ 🦷 🤩🤩 Сегодняшний гость: 🤩🤩 🐈⬛🐈⬛🐈⬛ Кисс 💫 ⚔: Йо-хо-хо! И снова здравствуй, моя сухопутная братия! Ха! Бейн приветствует вас! Я оторвал свой зад от капитанского кресла и вылез из трюма «Жемчужины», чтобы поговорить с тем самым гостем, которого сильно желала видеть предыдущая героиня нашей беседы... Держитесь за свои кошельки и уши — интервью с Кисс начинается…
❤1🔥1🥰1
— ☺️егодня мы решили порадовать вас утренними новостями за чашечкой кофе 🌟🌟 🌟🌟 ☺️дминистрация: 💙 Sayonara где-то прошляпили совладельца 💙 В Землях Рассвета сменился новостник, теперь пахать как проклятая будет Ло Йи 🤩🤩🤩 ☺️бзоры: 💙 ReMa выпустила обзор на moonton flood 🤩🤩🤩 ☺️нтервью 💙 Земли Рассвета обьявили победителей в голосовании на интервью 🤩🤩🤩…
🪄 Интерес к проекту возрос до 30 подписчиков. Должны признаться: нас это очень радует. Последние новости и интервью будут завтра, а сейчас — спите спокойно. Если, конечно, вас не утащат под кровать щупальцы Бейна.
—☺️так, сегодня достаточно интересно и много, садимся и слушаем! 🌟🌟 🌟🌟 ☺️дминистрация: 💙 В Ⲣⲟⲓⲋⲟⲛⲟυⲋ ⲁⲙⲣⲏⲓⲋⲃⲉⲛⲁ новый следящий за репостами, желаем ей крепких нервов уследить за всеми проектами 💙 Luminous Flood в поисках монтажёра, платят за работу натурой 💙 Нана из Salvatore в поисках помощника по нью 💙 Born to Comeback в поиске админов, которые …
🪄 Пока я смотрю на нелепые посты в подслушке, параллельно успеваю анонсировать интервью с Кисс. Посмотрим, насколько она интересная личность. ⭐
—☺️адеюсь вы провели сегодня отличный день, чтобы узнать последние новости дня) 🌟🌟 🌟🌟 ☺️озыгрыши: 💙 Eden озвучили результаты розыгрыша (клянусь насосали) 🤩🤩🤩 ☺️роекты: 💙 Pikmuh Flood обновляют лайф, исправляет пару ошибок, добавят +10 новых 🤩🤩🤩 ☺️урниры: 💙 В Forbidden Love прошла первая сетка турниров. Ребята сражались за последние нервные клетки 🤩…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @scandalistasquad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,289,783 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@scandalistasquad named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙎𝘾𝘼𝙉𝘿𝘼𝙇𝙄𝙎𝙏𝘼 𝙎𝙌𝙐𝘼𝘿” (@scandalistasquad), 35 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scandalistasquad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.