🎁

Channel
scam.net
@scamatochkanet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
33subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003860692307 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scamatochkanet |
| Description | официальный информационный канал чата @scamDOTnet по поводу сотрудничества обращайтесь @EndlessKOCMOC @knod4 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 7 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scamatochkanet |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 33 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 33 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 7 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 49
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 50
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 40s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
📱 Опубликовали доходы Telegram за первую половину 2025 года 🔵$300 млн — сделка с TON Foundation 🔵$223 млн — подписка Telegram Premium 🔵$222 млн — Telegram Stars и цифровые товары 🔵$125 млн — реклама Telegram Ads 💰Итого за 6 месяцев набегает около $870 млн ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🎁Наш гарант-чат.
😎35000 звезд за сообщение 📱Лимит платных сообщений увеличен с 10000⭐️ до 35000⭐️ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🎁Наш гарант-чат.
🎁Новые подарки, которые должны были выйти на праздники 📱Одна из Креативных Дизайнеров поделилась подарками, которые должны были выйти на праздники, но в последний момент поменяли решение, и всё отменили. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🎁Наш гарант-чат.
⛔️Telegram точно ВСЁ? 🦅Зампред комитета по информационной политике Андрей Свинцов заявил, что Telegram не будет работать даже с VPN. 🤔Действительно ли это будет так и повлияет ли это на рынок Telegram подарков — большой вопрос ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🎁Наш гарант-чат.
😎Неужели улучшения на🎁 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🎁Наш гарант-чат.
🧸На фоне прогревов о скорых улучшениях люди побежали скупать не улучшенные подарки на QuantMarket ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🎁Наш гарант-чат
👮♀️В MAX начали штрафовать за оскорбления 🟥Жительница Оренбургской области получила штраф 5000₽ за публичные оскорбления в родительском чате ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🎁Наш гарант-чат.
⛔️Спам-блок за офферы 📱Telegram стал активно выдавать спам-блок при частой отправке офферов на подарки ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🎁Наш гарант-чат.
🕺 Майнкрафт - СКАМ?? 🍔Пользователь лишился коллекции подарков, скачав Minecraft с модами в которых был стиллер 🖥В сборку был вшит стиллер сессии, с помощью которого злоумышленники смогли получить доступ к активной ПК-сессии холдера ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🎁Наш гарант-чат.
🎁Сколько было подарено Telegram подарков на 8 марта? 🧸 +2 000 000шт. — 100 000 000 ⭐️ 💝 +1 200 000шт. — 17 000 000 ⭐️ 🌹 +280 000шт. — 6 950 000 ⭐️ 💐 +110 000шт. — 5 400 000 ⭐️ 👍Telegram заработал 19.5млн$ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🎁Наш гарант-чат.
На 5 из 7 подарков Андрей уже показывал скины 🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁 Без скина остаётся ручка 🎁 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🎁Наш гарант-чат.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @scamatochkanet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,211,613 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“scam.net” (@scamatochkanet), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scamatochkanet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.