Channel
@scalpingxlearnchannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,179subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002224916768 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scalpingxlearnchannel |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 14 July 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scalpingxlearnchannel |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 1,179 | -12 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 1,191 | -6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 1,197 | +6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:47 | 1,191 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 1,195 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 1,191 | no change |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 1,191 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 14 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
59 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 44 | 74.6% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 25.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2024 to 14 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#advanced_trading [Lesson 15] Rudimentary SC02 First and foremost, this is not a recommendation, and it's not suitable for those new to trading. Theoretically, the purpose of SCO2 is to identify trend continuation reversal points based on indicators or principles of resistance and support. The current version of SC02 is the result of extensive analysis, statistics, and evaluation. In principle, many traders foll…
👍39❤11
Additional Reading: SC01 with RSI and BB (20;2.5) - an old document re-uploaded for the curious. This version has some differences compared to the regular version: - RSI signals are only taken after the candle closes, forming a peak or bottom. For example, an overbought RSI signal is only valid when the RSI value exceeds 70 and then returns below 70. The same applies to divergence; the RSI needs to close a new peak…
👍4❤3
#advanced_trading [Lesson 14] Rudimentary SC01 First and foremost, this is not a recommendation, and it's not suitable for those new to trading. Theoretically, the purpose of SC01 is to identify reversal points based on momentum shifts and exhaustion. The current version of SC01 is the result of extensive analysis, statistics, and evaluation. A bullish trend, according to momentum indicators, starts from oversol…
#advanced_trading [Lesson 13] Simplifying SCO2 When a Weak EMA Zone Appears (this is not mandatory) First, we need to understand what constitutes a weak EMA. Definition: In an uptrend (or downtrend) of an EMA, if the price movement triggers both the initial and the chase orders of the same SC02 signal, resulting in a 2R loss, then that EMA creates a weak EMA zone. If we apply basic simplification, the weak EMA zo…
👍1
#advanced_trading [Lesson 12] Simplifying SCO2 on Multiple EMAs by Merging Orders (this is not mandatory) For advanced SCO2 combinations using multiple EMAs, we can simplify signals and reduce pressure by merging orders. Principle: When nearby orders have similar EMAs and overlapping entry and stop-loss zones, we combine them into one order with the widest entry and stop-loss ranges that encompass all those orders…
#advanced_trading [Lesson 11] Simplifying SCO2 on a Single EMA (this is not mandatory) If you find managing multiple positions overwhelming, especially when encountering unfavorable DCA (Dollar-Cost Averaging) scenarios on a single EMA, you can opt to eliminate bad DCA signals and focus solely on good DCA signals relative to your existing positions. For instance, if Order 2 is a bad DCA compared to Order 1 (placed…
#advanced_trading [Lesson 10] Simplifying Consecutive SC01 Signals in the Same Direction Using Weak Zones (this is not mandatory) Some traders using SC01 may experience consecutive stop-losses due to going against the trend during an unpredictable, non-linear uptrend or downtrend. This can create significant psychological pressure, leading many to seek ways to simplify their approach. To address this, I'm providing…
#advanced_trading [Lesson 9] Simplifying SCO1 Using Great Patterns (this is not mandatory) If you've read Advanced Trading Lesson 3, you're likely familiar with assessing the strength of ideal patterns. Sometimes, when trading on smaller timeframes, SC01 can generate a lot of signals, making it feel overwhelming. You might want to simplify and reduce the pressure. You can try simplifying SC01 based on the strength…
#advanced_trading [Lesson 8] Simplifying SC01 by Adjusting Signal Criteria (this is not mandatory) The Relative Strength Index (RSI) measures the magnitude of recent price changes to evaluate overbought or oversold conditions in the market. The further away the RSI value is from 50, the stronger the buying or selling pressure. Typically, the basic SC01 strategy uses a threshold below 30 to identify oversold condit…
#advanced_trading [Lesson 7] Simplifying SCX Based on Amplitude (this is not mandatory) Many new traders learning SCX often find themselves overwhelmed by the number of signals generated by this strategy. A common suggestion to address this is to simplify the signals. In essence, simplification involves filtering out signals that don't meet certain criteria you set for your trades. This helps reduce position press…
#advanced_trading [Lesson 6] Things to Consider When Transferring SCO1 and SCO2 to Different Timeframes 1. Transferring SCO1 to a Different Timeframe (e.g., m1) You can simply transfer SCO1 to another timeframe without modifying any indicators. The RSI 14 remains the same. SCO1 can be used across multiple timeframes. The larger the timeframe, the less frequent the signals, and the profit efficiency (measured by R…
#advanced_trading [Lesson 5] Understanding Market Mechanics: Makers, Takers, and the Inevitability of Slippage At its core, a market is simply a place where buyers and sellers come together to trade. This exchange can happen in various ways, but the fundamental dynamic remains the same: someone wants to buy, and someone wants to sell. Who's Who in the Market? Within this ecosystem, we have two key players: - Mak…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @scalpingxlearnchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ScalpingX Learn” (@scalpingxlearnchannel), 1,179 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scalpingxlearnchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.