14 Aug 2024, 20:06 UTC≈1,320 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo
https://usforces.army/ якщо шукаєш офіційний канал Сил безпілотних систем Збройних Сил України - тобі сюди: https://t.me/usf_army — цей канал - резервний
❤6👍1💩1
Channel
Сили Безпілотних Систем - СБС
@sbsarmy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
143subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002162070264 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sbsarmy |
| Created | 14 August 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sbsarmy |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 143 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 144 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 146 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 147 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 147 | first reading |
Engagement
2 posts held, back to 14 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 1 post, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 75.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 12.5% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2024 to 14 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
14 Aug 2024, 20:03 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @sbsarmy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
1-й Окремий центр безпілотних систем (Україна) (uk.wikipedia.org)
“…військових із зацікавленими в службі в ЗСУ містянами }}[https://t.me/sbsarmy/86 Масштабний рекрутинг-захід відбувся у Дніпрі] 8 серпня…”
read 23 August 2026
“…військових із зацікавленими в службі в ЗСУ містянами }}[https://t.me/sbsarmy/86 Масштабний рекрутинг-захід відбувся у Дніпрі] 8 серпня…”
read 23 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сили Безпілотних Систем - СБС” (@sbsarmy), 143 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sbsarmy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.