Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for saylencer

Channel

saylencer

@saylencer0

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,228subscribers

+1,601 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001869681632
TypeChannel
Username@saylencer0
DescriptionПодписываясь на этот канал, вы подтверждаете, что вам есть 18 лет и вы сами ответственны за себя. Анонимка - https://t.me/anonaskbot?start=7ydf31r7znhm6 (дублируйте сообщения, пожалуйста)
Created12 December 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/saylencer0

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,27912,23911,25912,2286 August 202611 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 98 days, net +1,601. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,985–12,533 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 23:2112,228-5
8 Nov 2026, 16:1112,233-6
7 Nov 2026, 06:3512,239+2
6 Nov 2026, 04:0012,237+16
5 Nov 2026, 04:5912,221+38
4 Nov 2026, 04:3812,183+55
3 Nov 2026, 03:3712,128+96
2 Nov 2026, 04:2812,032+147
1 Nov 2026, 07:4411,885+204
31 Oct 2026, 07:1911,681+287
30 Oct 2026, 08:5611,394+413
29 Oct 2026, 12:2810,981+702
28 Oct 2026, 13:0410,279-1
27 Oct 2026, 14:3710,280-4
26 Oct 2026, 14:2910,284-5
25 Oct 2026, 13:1610,289-4
24 Oct 2026, 09:5910,293-7
23 Oct 2026, 10:4010,300-9
22 Oct 2026, 10:2810,309-7
21 Oct 2026, 01:3710,316first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.3%
avg views ÷ 12,228 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,640
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held46 (21 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total172,669
Reactions total23,790
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 21:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,180
Videos
≈94
Links
≈257

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

32,111 reactions across 46 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤19,85761.8%
❤‍🔥7,54723.5%
custom 52941863822379110324,61514.4%
💔920.287%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32,111 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
498
across the posts below
Posts paid on
26
of 46 we hold a reading for · 57%
Most on one post
267
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @saylencer0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 46 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 20:18 UTC899 views297 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

ШОК

❤219custom 529418638223791103242❤‍🔥36

12 Nov 2026, 19:30 UTC≈2,570 views194 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Риви вам дала ивент 📎 нужно скинуть в комментарии под этот пост мои наиболее вам понравившиеся работы Передаю: вот тебе🫵

❤152❤‍🔥25custom 529418638223791103217

12 Nov 2026, 12:49 UTC≈2,960 views832 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

мужчина кокетка🍷 томас позорище на игре жестка импровизировал перед служанками чтоб его не грохнули на балу у высшего вампира😌

❤599❤‍🔥152custom 529418638223791103275💔6

11 Nov 2026, 21:39 UTC≈3,290 views928 reactions2 Starsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#близнецы мне нечего выкладывать но расскажите как у вас дела 😀

❤681❤‍🔥159custom 529418638223791103288

11 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC≈3,550 views981 reactions4 Starsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#близнецы автор умер от количества работы🙄

❤702❤‍🔥186custom 529418638223791103290💔3

9 Nov 2026, 19:48 UTC≈4,200 views759 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#Orbzine споойлер

❤‍🔥526❤157custom 529418638223791103271💔5

9 Nov 2026, 19:45 UTC≈3,950 views433 reactions2 Starsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @kimrozzPhoto

🔯персонажики в днд с Дариной мой зелененький - Алекс(Леха). Он тифлинг смешной мальчик которого френдзонят🔯

❤329❤‍🔥66custom 529418638223791103238

6 Nov 2026, 21:58 UTC≈5,800 views1,340 reactions1 Starread 14 November 2026
Photo

кто не спит смотрите 😀 #близнецы

❤985custom 5294186382237911032205❤‍🔥147💔3

4 Nov 2026, 09:22 UTC≈6,700 views1,207 reactions1 Starread 14 November 2026
Photo

#близнецы КОТЯТААА

❤877❤‍🔥235custom 529418638223791103295

2 Nov 2026, 11:35 UTC≈7,850 views1,002 reactions1 Starread 14 November 2026
Photo

эх если бы не работа...

❤723❤‍🔥173custom 529418638223791103286💔20

1 Nov 2026, 20:26 UTC≈8,010 views1,104 reactions1 Starread 14 November 2026
Photo

они лучшие друзья они женаты 10 лет 😀 фанфакт Томас и Рэйвен живут вместе

❤827❤‍🔥187custom 529418638223791103290

31 Oct 2026, 20:33 UTC≈8,030 views1,489 reactions15 Starsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#близнецы вот это дроооопп 🤩🤩

❤1,010❤‍🔥308custom 5294186382237911032171

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @saylencer0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @saylencer0 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
22 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

kiokio🐯
@demonrumanga · 51,448
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 25 August 2026
идзая : бинго ; интерактивы ; опросы
@ord0favonius · 44,767
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 27 August 2026
Nu carnival | sofia_sun🦋
@nucarnivalroomeiden · 24,703
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“saylencer” (@saylencer0), 12,228 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saylencer0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.